The flesh is not a natureYou will find your answer in Gal 5v16-26...
It is called the flesh!
The flesh is not a natureYou will find your answer in Gal 5v16-26...
It is called the flesh!
There indeed is truth in it, but Christ views us as perfect....the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak (Matthew 26:41).
The new creation continues to live with corruption (the sin nature) (1 Corinthians 15:53) until death or the rapture of the Church. However, the younger (the new creation) is greater than the elder (the sin nature) (Genesis 25:23). Why? Because greater is He that is in you, than he that is in the world (1 John 4:4, Romans 6). We are still dying which shows that the sin nature lives in us. If the sin nature did not live in the Christian we would not age or die.
How can he be hyper grace? He does not believe in eternal security.Wow is this guy ever going to lead some people astray. He teaches some of the same stuff hyper grace teachers do. Whenever you hear someone teaching about identity, run, do not walk, away. FWIW, this guy was one of Todd White's mentors.
And that is what every Christian should strive for. But at the same time it is FALSE DOCTRINE to teach that the sin nature of the believer has been eradicated, or that Christians do not need to deal with their present sins (Hyper Grace).
AmenThis is more of the misinformation that I was talking about. None of the prominent teachers, that I know of, teach that "Christians do not need to deal with their present sins." In fact, they teach the exact opposite, however the method may differ. Sure they teach that sin does not condemn the believer to Hell, and how could it? Did not Christ die to pay for all our sins? If He didn't, as God's word clearly reveals, He as the sacrificial lamb, would have to suffer since the foundation of the world (in Hebrews). It also says, "where remission of these is, there is no more offering for sin." Our sins have experienced remission, by the shed blood of Christ. This doesn't excuse sin though.
They emphasize Romans 6, just as much as the Apostle Paul taught that we ought to reckon ourselves dead to sin and alive unto God.
How one comes away with such a view (of not dealing with sin) from such teachers is not through firsthand experience but hearsay.
Romans 7:18 - For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not. (KJV)
How can he be hyper grace? He does not believe in eternal security.
I didn't say he was hyper grace, but just that some his teaching has some of its elements. For example stressing identity as the way to overcome sin. I think there were some other things that struck me as being the same, but I can't remember what they were.
Oh yeah... no sin nature was another.
Well, he does not follow popular interpretations.His interpretation of 1 John 1:8 was another.
Do we not all want to be sinless?I didn't say he was hyper grace, but just that some his teaching has some of its elements. For example stressing identity as the way to overcome sin. I think there were some other things that struck me as being the same, but I can't remember what they were.
That verse means we don't make a practice of sinning. We still have a sinful nature but we don't live by its dictates:How does one answer the claim that only those whose father is the devil has a sin nature in consideration of 1 John 3:8?
He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning.
Seeing it is written that children of the devil will do the lusts of their heavenly father the devil, then if he who is the devil was a liar from the beginning who abode not in the truth, then would a sinner lie? (Luke 11:13)
Then is it little wonder the children of the devil are at enmity against Spirit of truth, because they are not subject to the law of truth, neither can the be because there is no truth in them. (See Luke 10:21) Yet, whosoever is born of the Spirit of truth cannot sin, for there is no lie in them, for the LORD is a God of truth. (see Ps 31:5)
I have my doubts, I mean we are a new creature (2 Corinthians 5:17).[/MEDIA]
God bless you all
amen.Who really was converted to Jesus is a new creature. Unfortunately, the most people don't. They only convinced themselves that are born again.
Who isn't new creature remains condemned in their trespasses and sins (Eph 2.1) and doesn't belong to Christ:
- "For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit. For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace. Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God. But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his." (Rom 8.5-9).
Nothing in the context of 2 Cor 5:17 suggests we don't have a sinful nature anymore.amen.
If we backslide like King David the Holy Spirit convicts us
That is not biblical. Here, this is the truth:He's right. The temptation to sin does not come from ourselves, it comes to us. We sin when and if we give in to that temptation. Had we not been tempted would we sin? No, not if we are true christians, we do not go around looking to sin. I want to do what's right, but sometimes I fail to- which makes me guilty of sin. Did I want to overeat delicious food and become overweight? No. I tried to resist, but my flesh got hungrier and hungrier. It's power became stronger than my self control. So i have to make my self control stronger and stronger until it overpowers my flesh.
If it was my root want to sin there would not exist a struggle not to sin. A caterpillar is a worm who does what they do- it's their nature. But once it becomes a butterfly it is no longer their nature to do what caterpillars do. It is now their nature to fly. I am not saying that when we sin we are not guilty of that sin, I'm saying that we do not desire to sin. We don't sit there and say "You know what, no temptation has come to me, but i think I'll go out and sin anyways."
We are talking about the source. Yes I want to taste delicious food, yes I want to indulge in overstuffing myself- but not if it means sinning against God by becoming a glutton. If not tempted to do so, and someone came to me and asked "Do you want to sin against God and become a glutton?" I would say no- it is not in my nature as a Christian to want to sin. But if you add the pull of physical hunger, the stress relief of comfort food, and the pleasure of taste- it is now hard for me not to, I still try to resist, but am not successful all the time (sometimes I am). So i need to get stronger at self control, to resist the devil- not to resist myself- if I wanted to sin i would not struggle so hard not to sin- I would just go about sinning freely without any resistance.