M
Where does Ezekiel say that its under the new covenant?Why are you so keen to contradict the prophecy of Ezekiel?
What he describes is under the New Covenant, but for whatever reason, there is also a temple in Jerusalem and animal sacrifices under Christ, as well as David as prince under Christ. This is no way would nullify the finished work of Christ, since the New Covenant is in His blood.
Let's not try to use human reasoning against divine revelation.
No paper bag. Disgusting.
exactly which covenant requiring the blood of bulls and goats will they need to enter into to maintain their faith...?
btw interesting that all the years Daniel was in Babylon he didn't make any sacrifices, yet he kept his faith.
exactly which covenant requiring the blood of bulls and goats will they need to enter into to maintain their faith...?
btw interesting that all the years Daniel was in Babylon he didn't make any sacrifices, yet he kept his faith.
weird; i find plastic bags kinda disgusting
Was there a temple in Babylon that I do not know about? I mean, there could have been . . . seeing as how all the gold and furniture from the temple was there.
no temple the Law Daniel was under would have allowed him to sacrifice at.
which is what i mean, he was required to make sacrifices, but he was restrained, and he didn't lose faith for it. so i don't understand how someone not required to sacrifice animals needs to in order to have faith?
i am working under the assumption that because of what Christ did no sacrifice is anymore required of anyone with faith in Him. maybe you are about to show me i am incorrect in my thoughts tho![]()
They are NOT for "memorial" purposes as some have suggeested. Nor are they for looking back to the work on the Cross.
It mentions they are for sin offerings.
We should let the N.T. interpret the O.T. not vice versa. Hebrews makes it clear, the animal sacrifices are done with. The old covenant vanished away.
Heb 9:9 Which was a figure for the time then present, in which were offered both gifts and sacrifices, that could not make him that did the service perfect, as pertaining to the conscience;
Heb 9:10 Which stood only in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, imposed on them until the time of reformation.
The entire chapter and the following and preceding chapters are loaded on this subject.
And I admit that my poll was not neutral, because of the fact that I recognize this is a very recent teaching, and anything recent should be taken with a mountain of salt.
I wonder what Barnabas or Peter or even the reformers would of said if they had heard this idea.
Eph 2:11-22 Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands;
That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:
But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.
For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us;
Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace;
And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby:
And came and preached peace to you which were afar off, and to them that were nigh.
For through him we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father.
Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;
And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;
In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord:
In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.
Israel and the Church same there
In the book of Revelation there is a distinction made though. It speaks for these verses meaning in CHRIST we are one. But in the future the 144 000 are specifically said to be israelites.
Your problem is that you see no distinction between Israel and the church
There will still be unbelievers during the 1,000 year Millennium who will need to be redeemed and follow the rules of the Kingdom which Jesus provides in the first three Gospels.
The crucifixion and the sealing of the Holy Spirit are not available to them under this return to the Law.
when did i say that?
Israel has to exist to be made jealous by Yah taking to Himself a people who were not a people, with a strange tongue and stammering lips, who did not look for Him.Israel must be on the earth to fulfill the prophecy above, which has nothing to do with the church.
Well, if you see the distinction why are you fighting against that view? Do you believe in a literal millennial kingdom lasting 1,000 years?