The Bible tells us to love our neighbor as we love ourselves.
I stated, not every Christian loves themselves. There is nothing in that statement that contradicts the Bible.
In point of fact, that not every Christian loves themselves goes a long way to explain why those who claim Christ treat people like crap. How does someone know how to love others when they don't first know what love is by loving themselves?
You just won't stop with the antichristian, racist lies. Sammy Davis Jr. was Jew, the same as any other. You lie about what a Jew is.
You need to stop it with your ignorant, disgusting lies. Your new quotes don't add anything more to the website you already linked to which refuted your lies, lies you refuse to give up. Under 8% of German-ish Jews have a particular genetic marker. And, Jews from the rest of the world don't have that market, but many German non-Jews do. That doesn't make Jews a race. What's wrong with you?
Here is an article about Jews on Wikipedia. It discusses what a Jew is. There is the biological and conversion discussed. You need to stop calling people liars in this Christian site. The following proves my point and makes your assertions in error. You made assertions in ignorance. Should I then call you a liar?
The following is an excerpt from the following site about Jews
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews
Who is a Jew? and Jewish identity
Judaism shares some of the characteristics of a nation, an ethnicity, a religion, and a culture, making the definition of who is a Jew vary slightly depending on whether a religious or national approach to identity is used. Generally, in modern secular usage Jews include three groups: people who were born to a Jewish family regardless of whether or not they follow the religion, those who have some Jewish ancestral background or lineage (sometimes including those who do not have strictly matrilineal descent), and people without any Jewish ancestral background or lineage who have formally converted to Judaism and therefore are followers of the religion.
Historical definitions of Jewish identity have traditionally been based on halakhic definitions of matrilineal descent, and halakhic conversions. These definitions of who is a Jew date back to the codification of the Oral Torah into the Babylonian Talmud, around 200 CE. Interpretations of sections of the Tanakh, such as Deuteronomy 7:1–5, by Jewish sages, are used as a warning against intermarriage between Jews and Canaanites because "[the non-Jewish husband] will cause your child to turn away from Me and they will worship the gods (i.e., idols) of others." Leviticus 24:10 says that the son in a marriage between a Hebrew woman and an Egyptian man is "of the community of Israel." This is complemented by Ezra 10:2–3, where Israelites returning from Babylon vow to put aside their gentile wives and their children. A popular theory is that the rape of Jewish women in captivity brought about the law of Jewish identity being inherited through the maternal line, although scholars challenge this theory citing the Talmudic establishment of the law from the pre-exile period. Another argument is that the rabbis changed the law of patrilineal descent to matrilineal descent due to the widespread rape of Jewish women by Roman soldiers. Since the anti-religious Haskalah movement of the late 18th and 19th centuries, halakhic interpretations of Jewish identity have been challenged.
According to historian Shaye J. D. Cohen, the status of the offspring of mixed marriages was determined patrilineally in the Bible. He brings two likely explanations for the change in Mishnaic times: first, the Mishnah may have been applying the same logic to mixed marriages as it had applied to other mixtures (Kil'ayim). Thus, a mixed marriage is forbidden as is the union of a horse and a donkey, and in both unions the offspring are judged matrilineally. Second, the Tannaim may have been influenced by Roman law, which dictated that when a parent could not contract a legal marriage, offspring would follow the mother. Rabbi Rivon Krygier follows a similar reasoning, arguing that Jewish descent had formerly passed through the patrineal descent and the law of matrilineal descent had its roots in the Roman legal system.
