Don't vote red, don't vote blue

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,719
113
#41
"A lesser evil is still evil"

"Silence in the face of evil is itself evil"

There I've done my part and broken the silence.

No go vote for the lesser evil, like you were going to anyway.
Are you one of those leftists that stays home on Halloween, takes candy from the kids who knock on your door, and gives it to the fat lazy kids who won't trick or treat for themselves?
 

RickyZ

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2012
9,635
787
113
#42
Good luck....when one bases his stance on make believe, imaginary "realisms" you will never change their mind........he has been on this socialist anti-money rant for some time now.....even though a man far wiser than HE stated clearly that it is of God's hand that we enjoy the fruits of our labor.......but hey....religionists know way more than the men actually inspired by God....
Again, you are not listening, and right back atcha.

Good luck with that!
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,719
113
#43
Good luck....when one bases his stance on make believe, imaginary "realisms" you will never change their mind........he has been on this socialist anti-money rant for some time now.....even though a man far wiser than HE stated clearly that it is of God's hand that we enjoy the fruits of our labor.......but hey....religionists know way more than the men actually inspired by God....
He's a theological train wreck as well. He started some absurd thread full of out of context Scripture and hypotheses of how people can lose salvation because they got saved in time and therefore Jesus could really say "I never knew you."

Talk about being irrational man. And he actually believed himself.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
#44
Again, you are not listening, and right back atcha.

Good luck with that!
MAN...you don't know what you are talking about.....I can hear you loud and clear, I just choose to ignore what you have gone to seed on and I choose to ignore the fact that YOU, by DEFAULT, will vote for the murder of babies, the rights of gays, the rights of a boy to take a wizz right next to your granddaughter, the right to silence Christians, their witness and choice to not bake a cake for a gay wedding.....because you will either NOT vote or by voting some other party will GIVE a vote to the Democrats.......so....whatever man......!!
 

RickyZ

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2012
9,635
787
113
#45
Are you one of those leftists that stays home on Halloween, takes candy from the kids who knock on your door, and gives it to the fat lazy kids who won't trick or treat for themselves?
OK, I'm saying adios now, because you guys are obviously immersed SO DEEP in the red cool aid IT IS SERIOUSLY AFFECTING YOUR HEARING AND VISION.

For the record. NO color of cool-aid is safe to drink. (Conservative translation: THEN YOU'RE DRINKING THE BLUE!)

Shakes head and walks away...
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
#47
He's a theological train wreck as well. He started some absurd thread full of out of context Scripture and hypotheses of how people can lose salvation because they got saved in time and therefore Jesus could really say "I never knew you."

Talk about being irrational man. And he actually believed himself.
A prime example of a religionist that has gone to seed on some whimsical ideal....by default if you vote for a third party or do not vote you give a vote to those whose whole platform is anti-God, anti-Biblical....

end of story...
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,526
2,608
113
#49
No, I'm listening which is why I know that your ideology is that of cultural marxism. You're already infected and don't even know it.

I would disagree that Ricky's ideology is cultural Marxism.

I think his ideology is just straight up, old fashioned Marxism.



Oh well, at least he's a traditionalist.


...
 

Lillywolf

Well-known member
Aug 29, 2018
1,562
543
113
#50
Do you even hear yourself? "I'd like to see the old guard tossed out but I'm voting for them anyway".
I see a false teacher giving you a high five as you misrepresent what I said Do you even read yourself when you sound that foolish? Or is it your priority is to just slam a Republican because that's what you do.
 

Lillywolf

Well-known member
Aug 29, 2018
1,562
543
113
#51
OK, I'm saying adios now, because you guys are obviously immersed SO DEEP in the red cool aid IT IS SERIOUSLY AFFECTING YOUR HEARING AND VISION.

For the record. NO color of cool-aid is safe to drink. (Conservative translation: THEN YOU'RE DRINKING THE BLUE!)

Shakes head and walks away...
YEP! That's how Democrats roll.
That's why they have to be thrown out November 6th when they occupy a seat that can do even more damage to America than they've done in the past. And promise to in future if we don't stop them at the polls.
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,526
2,608
113
#52
"A lesser evil is still evil"

Lesser is still lesser:
Yes, a lesser evil is still EVIL.
But likewise, a lesser evil is also still LESSER.


I always prefer less evil to more evil:
There are many evils that befall us.
I would ALWAYS prefer less.


You do the same:
A. To say you prefer a greater evil would be silly and disingenuous.
B. In our own lives, on a daily basis, we ALL prioritize a great variety of things, and we regularly choose things by determining "which is less bad."



THE FOG OF POLITICS:
A. A great many people have perfectly good common sense when confronted with the ordinary problems of daily life.
B. But mysteriously, when those ordinary problems are "telescoped out" to a macro level, as they are in politics... those same people are suddenly unable to understand common sense.




...
---
 

Lillywolf

Well-known member
Aug 29, 2018
1,562
543
113
#53
Vote third party. No you will not elect a third party candidate, nor will the major parties get the message, but you'l be refusing to take part in the march to destruction.
YES! Waste your vote! Insure all the old guard Dem's get in, just like Ricky wants because Ricky knows nothing about the electoral process.

"A lesser evil is still evil"

"Silence in the face of evil is itself evil"

There I've done my part and broken the silence.

No go vote for the lesser evil, like you were going to anyway.
Irony!
You advocate for evil and then say that.
 

Lillywolf

Well-known member
Aug 29, 2018
1,562
543
113
#54
Lesser is still lesser:
Yes, a lesser evil is still EVIL.
But likewise, a lesser evil is also still LESSER.
And it is still EVIL! Who wants to live with evil at all?

I always prefer less evil to more evil:
There are many evils that befall us.
I would ALWAYS prefer less.
Are you willing to defend that you voted for evil ?

You do the same:
A. To say you prefer a greater evil would be silly and disingenuous.
B. In our own lives, on a daily basis, we ALL prioritize a great variety of things, and we regularly choose things by determining "which is less bad."


THE FOG OF POLITICS:
A.
A great many people have perfectly good common sense when confronted with the ordinary problems of daily life.
B. But mysteriously, when those ordinary problems are "telescoped out" to a macro level, as they are in politics... those same people are suddenly unable to understand common sense.
At this point in their rhetoric are we to take them seriously? Or believe they're old enough to vote or if they are, are actually registered? When someone doesn't sound like they're an intelligent citizen concerning the election, believe them.






...
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
13,590
9,107
113
#55
Lesser is still lesser:
Yes, a lesser evil is still EVIL.
But likewise, a lesser evil is also still LESSER.


I always prefer less evil to more evil:
There are many evils that befall us.
I would ALWAYS prefer less.


You do the same:
A. To say you prefer a greater evil would be silly and disingenuous.
B. In our own lives, on a daily basis, we ALL prioritize a great variety of things, and we regularly choose things by determining "which is less bad."



THE FOG OF POLITICS:
A. A great many people have perfectly good common sense when confronted with the ordinary problems of daily life.
B. But mysteriously, when those ordinary problems are "telescoped out" to a macro level, as they are in politics... those same people are suddenly unable to understand common sense.




...
---
This is the problem with so many like Ricky. He has good intentions, but we all know where that leads.

The PERFECT is not going to govern on a throne or an oval office til The King of Kings returns!



The gigantic chasm between the evil platform of Democrats, and that of the waaaay lesser evil of the Republicans, DEMANDS that decent people vote RED!!!
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,526
2,608
113
#56
At this point in their rhetoric are we to take them seriously? Or believe they're old enough to vote or if they are, are actually registered? When someone doesn't sound like they're an intelligent citizen concerning the election, believe them.
...


Rhetoric


A. Technically, my argument wasn't rhetoric... it wasn't a rhetorical argument but rather a simple logic argument based on logical analysis of semantics within a proposition.

B. Technically, your argument was rhetoric, as it simply used the rhetorical techniques of moral superiority, ridicule, and contradiction, not logical argument, to rebut me.



Granted, my closing statement could have been considered rhetoric... you can fault me for that.
But I did put it in a different color to set it apart from the rest of my argument.


God Bless.
Max



...

...
 

Lillywolf

Well-known member
Aug 29, 2018
1,562
543
113
#57
Rhetoric


A. Technically, my argument wasn't rhetoric... it wasn't a rhetorical argument but rather a simple logic argument based on logical analysis of semantics within a proposition.

B. Technically, your argument was rhetoric, as it simply used the rhetorical techniques of moral superiority, ridicule, and contradiction, not logical argument, to rebut me.



Granted, my closing statement could have been considered rhetoric... you can fault me for that.
But I did put it in a different color to set it apart from the rest of my argument.


God Bless.
Max



...

...
:rolleyes: Yeah, technically, I wasn't calling your argument Rhetoric. I was asking you the question about the member your post was referring to.
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,526
2,608
113
#58
:rolleyes: Yeah, technically, I wasn't calling your argument Rhetoric. I was asking you the question about the member your post was referring to.

Technically, if you were referring to Ricky then I'd say the format seemed confusing but I would be in agreement with you.



...
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,526
2,608
113
#59
And this thread has just become really weirdly confusing.

I'm opting out for a while... till the Bolsheviks are under control and democracy is safe.


...
 

Lillywolf

Well-known member
Aug 29, 2018
1,562
543
113
#60
Technically, if you were referring to Ricky then I'd say the format seemed confusing but I would be in agreement with you.



...
I don't know how it could be confusing to you. I quoted your reply to them. You should remember your remarks as intended and to Ricky. So when I asked about "their" rhetoric to you, as I was quoting you and that meant my reply was concerning your remarks to them, you should have known "their", was a reference to Ricky. Maybe it's that myopic vision that gets you confuzeled? ;) :p Two eyes are better than one.

Moving on.