Question...
- Thread starter CharliRenee
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
My friend, I never said the bibles I read are any better or from a different source. However, I am not the one who is rejecting the ability to take doctrine from Acts.
14-17 But don’t let it faze you. Stick with what you learned and believed, sure of the integrity of your teachers—why, you took in the sacred Scriptures with your mother’s milk! There’s nothing like the written Word of God for showing you the way to salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. Every part of Scripture is God-breathed and useful one way or another—showing us truth, exposing our rebellion, correcting our mistakes, training us to live God’s way. Through the Word we are put together and shaped up for the tasks God has for us.(2 Timothy 3)
All scripture(The Message says 'Every part of scripture') is God-breathed and is for showing us truth. That even includes the book of Acts of the Apostles my friend.
I am leaving this here and I will not bother you anymore, as you seem to be allergic to being taught.
14-17 But don’t let it faze you. Stick with what you learned and believed, sure of the integrity of your teachers—why, you took in the sacred Scriptures with your mother’s milk! There’s nothing like the written Word of God for showing you the way to salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. Every part of Scripture is God-breathed and useful one way or another—showing us truth, exposing our rebellion, correcting our mistakes, training us to live God’s way. Through the Word we are put together and shaped up for the tasks God has for us.(2 Timothy 3)
All scripture(The Message says 'Every part of scripture') is God-breathed and is for showing us truth. That even includes the book of Acts of the Apostles my friend.
I am leaving this here and I will not bother you anymore, as you seem to be allergic to being taught.
Prayer is the answer.
Yes. Athanasius said there are other books not part of the canon. As they shouldn't be.
Canon of Carthage is not the canon of the Jews Old Testament. The Jews Old Testament rejects the apocryphal books. Carthage would be influenced by the Alexandrian Jews, who also blended philosophy in with their interpretations of Scripture. The Jews Old Testament comes from the Jews in Palestine. They reject the apocrypha.
Quantrill
Canon of Carthage is not the canon of the Jews Old Testament. The Jews Old Testament rejects the apocryphal books. Carthage would be influenced by the Alexandrian Jews, who also blended philosophy in with their interpretations of Scripture. The Jews Old Testament comes from the Jews in Palestine. They reject the apocrypha.
Quantrill
Sorry, I do not have time to teach you basics. Study in your own time. If you do not undertand the photo, you cannot answer my questions in some kind of a quality I need.
I need Christians who studied it, who know about it for years and are able to give me proper answers, if they do not agree with me.
I need Christians who studied it, who know about it for years and are able to give me proper answers, if they do not agree with me.
That is right because Paul dismissed it. He had the Masoretic in mind when he paraphrased Deut 30:11-14.
Like I said There are quotes from both the LXX and Masoretic in the New Testament. Are you denying that?
In your example, Paul does not quote LXX or consider it when he paraphrases Deut. 30:11-14 in verse 10:6-8.
Now why would I purport that he does not even consider it in His paraphrase? Something is missing from the LXX in verse 14 that is why.
I know. Thanks for bringing it up anyway some might not
Like I said There are quotes from both the LXX and Masoretic in the New Testament. Are you denying that?
In your example, Paul does not quote LXX or consider it when he paraphrases Deut. 30:11-14 in verse 10:6-8.
Now why would I purport that he does not even consider it in His paraphrase? Something is missing from the LXX in verse 14 that is why.
I know. Thanks for bringing it up anyway some might not
It proves that the apostles did not use the masoretic text. What else should it prove?
But I like how you say you are not wrong even before you understand what is going on.
But I like how you say you are not wrong even before you understand what is going on.
Quantrill
The "LXX" sign says that it can be found ONLY in the LXX.
If there is no LXX sign, it can mean:
a) MT and LXX do not differ
b) its in the MT only
c) its neither in the MT nor in the LXX
Yes, not all quotations are from the LXX, only about 80% are.
If we would like to have the exact textual version apostles used, we would have to compile it, it does not exist as a whole. The LXX is the most close version we can have.
If there is no LXX sign, it can mean:
a) MT and LXX do not differ
b) its in the MT only
c) its neither in the MT nor in the LXX
Yes, not all quotations are from the LXX, only about 80% are.
If we would like to have the exact textual version apostles used, we would have to compile it, it does not exist as a whole. The LXX is the most close version we can have.
