Intercultural Gospeling and a Literal Translation of Scripture

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Aug 25, 2018
147
100
28
#21
What was the method of evangelism in the hundreds of years prior to the completed text? Personally, I questioned the Bible’s legitimacy as a non-Christian. It was the kind acts, fellowship and explanation of salvation from a pastor that inspired my commitment to Christ. Since then I have been grappling with the Bible’s teachings, daily discovering new wisdom for twenty years....and counting.
The method seemed to be oral instruction, and this method is still quite popular.
I can understand your apprehension. I think though, that kindness is not enough to convert skeptics. I have to prove things to be likely in order to believe.
 
Aug 25, 2018
147
100
28
#22
As surprising as this may sound to some, the bible itself is a very cultural book. Meaning, that at the time the various books were written, they were composed in a manner and language that the people for whom the books were written understood readily by simply by hearing (not reading) the text. This also includes the use of metaphors and idioms that they understood instantly but when literally translated into English today makes little sense without taking these things into consideration. But, that is simply the text.

Your OP questioned whether "a literal word-for-word translation of Scripture will cause people to misunderstand the gospel." One thing I find amazing is that the Gospel (literally: "good news") can transcend any culture. I don't have to do anything (sacrifice an animal, offer up fruits of the field, do good works, etc) to be accepted by God or show myself worthy - all of that has already been accomplished by the work of Christ who made peace between myself and the Father (Eph 2:13-18)
I agree. The more I study it, the more clear it becomes that I will never be able to fully immerse myself in the original audience and how the text was meant to be taken. The Message is more than a word for word translation.
 
Aug 25, 2018
147
100
28
#23
Faith, something you cannot see, tells all who have it that understanding only comes from our Father.

No man has the mind of God, His way are not man's ways. To even entertain that anyone may seize understanding of truth and truth itself from a human mind is spiritually unsound and impossible.

All may attmpt to approach our Father as intellectuals, scientists, philosophers or whatever other great minds one may dream up, but no man is going to be able to discuss the etrnal trut of our Fagther with anything other than the approach of a child who honestly is aware he does not have any preconceived notions. He must hear by the Holy Spirit. If answers do not come , wait.
Yes, but God gave us culture on top of that. No human alive is a blank slate that anything can be written on him or her.
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,526
2,608
113
#24
No, it is something I have been studying and reading about from others who have been on such trips. Also, I have had close friends from different cultures that I have worked with in similar matters.
Why have you been studying these things?
Do you plan on devoting your life to the mission field, or are these purely academic questions?

...
 

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,429
6,707
113
#25
Yes, but God gave us culture on top of that. No human alive is a blank slate that anything can be written on him or her.
Culture!? OK, I live in Spain. I am not RCC so most Spanish who believe such think I am a pagan...……….this is culture.

Furthermore, all the cultures of the earth, all the amassed scientific knowledge of this age , everything will be gone in the fire next time, and according to our faith nothing will reamin except the eternal.

I wonder what culture, our Father would be to you? I look forward to His perfecting us all and we all live in etrnal perfection. That is not a product of culture, that is a product of faith.
 

GraceAndTruth

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2015
2,031
637
113
#26
If they don't understand the bible words, God said He would make the rocks cry out with His message.
We ARE taught by the Holy Spirit, WITH scripture...........the Spirit does not teach on His own but always in harmony with the Father and the Son.

If anyone is hearing "voices" they need to get HELP.
 

Hevosmies

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2018
3,612
2,633
113
#27
This also includes the use of metaphors and idioms that they understood instantly but when literally translated into English today makes little sense without taking these things into consideration.
Can you give me some example of this? Im interested to know
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,774
113
#28
With somewhat of an understanding of cultural differences, I am of the belief that a literal word-for-word translation of Scripture will cause people to misunderstand the gospel.
This is what the delusional dynamic equivalence proponents believe. But it is totally false.

1. All human beings are sinners.

2. All need to be saved.

3. Christ is the Savior of the world.

4. Therefore God commands all men everywhere to obey the Gospel -- repent and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ.
 

Hevosmies

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2018
3,612
2,633
113
#29
I agree. The more I study it, the more clear it becomes that I will never be able to fully immerse myself in the original audience and how the text was meant to be taken. The Message is more than a word for word translation.
I know there are SOME idioms that cannot be translated word for word.

But MOST of the Bible can definately be easily translated to every language on the planet. I speak multiple languages and 99% of the texts I got no problem translating off the top of my head. Very simple, really.

Dog is a dog in spanish and in english.

I definately favor the formal equivelance translations (Notice i didnt say word for word, such a thing does NOT exist) over the dynamic equivelance ones.
Problem with the latter is, they have the ability to just make it up as they go along to make it "easier to understand".

As one Pastor said: I find it amazing that Americans who speak english as their native language cant figure out simple thees and thous. People with university and college education. Unbelievable.
 

Deade

Called of God
Dec 17, 2017
16,724
10,531
113
78
Vinita, Oklahoma, USA
yeshuaofisrael.org
#30
Faith, something you cannot see, tells all who have it that understanding only comes from our Father.

No man has the mind of God, His way are not man's ways. To even entertain that anyone may seize understanding of truth and truth itself from a human mind is spiritually unsound and impossible.

All may attmpt to approach our Father as intellectuals, scientists, philosophers or whatever other great minds one may dream up, but no man is going to be able to discuss the etrnal trut of our Fagther with anything other than the approach of a child who honestly is aware he does not have any preconceived notions. He must hear by the Holy Spirit. If answers do not come , wait.
I agree. The Holy Spirit will interpret scripture for us. Sometime what is said in scripture may be for another time or another people. It is dangerous for us to read a certain passage then force ourselves to draw a conclusion. We can't help but go wrong doing that.

Scripture has to fit together into a picture of what God is doing with His creation. It's like a big puzzle. When something finally fits, then we can define it. There is nothing wrong to confess we don't have all knowledge. Never will, this side of glory. :cool:
 

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,429
6,707
113
#31
As far as my own meager studies have takenme, I have seen how the Hebrew is translated quite well, including idiomatic terms and phrases.

For instance one idiomatic reference is when a person's nostrils flare…….it means becoming angryi, but it is translated as becoming angry.
 
Aug 25, 2018
147
100
28
#32
Why have you been studying these things?
Do you plan on devoting your life to the mission field, or are these purely academic questions?

...
I study these things because I am a theology major in university. I began attending in hopes of being able to light the world on fire for God.
 
Aug 25, 2018
147
100
28
#33
Culture!? OK, I live in Spain. I am not RCC so most Spanish who believe such think I am a pagan...……….this is culture.

Furthermore, all the cultures of the earth, all the amassed scientific knowledge of this age , everything will be gone in the fire next time, and according to our faith nothing will reamin except the eternal.

I wonder what culture, our Father would be to you? I look forward to His perfecting us all and we all live in etrnal perfection. That is not a product of culture, that is a product of faith.
It makes little difference in this topic where you live. I have friends in Iran, Romania, England, Canada, the United States, and so forth.
I am uncertain on this topic, as who we are is strongly based in our culture. I cannot agree nor disagree with you until I have evidence for both.
I think that God will be according to each culture, as the apostles demonstrated in their ministry.
 

Hevosmies

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2018
3,612
2,633
113
#34
The main thing about culture is: Mine is right, yours is wrong. Mine is perfectly normal, yours is weird.

Thats the bottom line.

The Apostles were all jews, but their hebrew culture was largely impacted by greek/hellenistic vibes by the 1st century. There is even a thing called "hellenistic judaism" at the time. Which the Apostles obviously werent part of, but just saying, it was a common thing among jews at large during that time.
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,526
2,608
113
#35
I study these things because I am a theology major in university. I began attending in hopes of being able to light the world on fire for God.

Perhaps, just perhaps, there are scholars at your university who have a lack of experience in practical ministry.

In your opening post, you describe the dilemma of giving the gospel to people who are not well educated enough to comprehend scholarly works.
This is not a genuine dilemma.

Scholarly works have a very important place, but those who are trained in practical ministry have had no trouble, for millennia, in explaining doctrinal truths to less educated people. There is no dilemma here.

I am far from the best example of an evangelist, and even I have led people to Christ, in 3rd world countries, with no more appeal to "scholarly works" than my ability to draw in the dirt with a stick.

God Bless
Max

...
 

Hevosmies

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2018
3,612
2,633
113
#36
Perhaps, just perhaps, there are scholars at your university who have a lack of experience in practical ministry.

In your opening post, you describe the dilemma of giving the gospel to people who are not well educated enough to comprehend scholarly works.
This is not a genuine dilemma.

Scholarly works have a very important place, but those who are trained in practical ministry have had no trouble, for millennia, in explaining doctrinal truths to less educated people. There is no dilemma here.

I am far from the best example of an evangelist, and even I have led people to Christ, in 3rd world countries, with no more appeal to "scholarly works" than my ability to draw in the dirt with a stick.

God Bless
Max

...
You took the words right outta my mouth Max . I wanted to type this but refrained since I didnt want to discourage anyone from pursuing a theology degree.

But from my experience, the regular joe has the best tools for evangelizing already at his disposal. And that is, KEEP IT SIMPLE.

This is one of my pet peeves of the "what is the gospel" videos on youtube, if some unsaved person looks them up and listens to someone like John Piper, guaranteed they will be confused, he uses much "theology slang" that the average joe wont get.

One thing I would also say: Peter was a fisherman, he wasnt a highly educated man. God used him greatly.
BUT: Lets not forget, degrees and education has their place, PAUL on the other hand was a very educated man and knowledgeable in judaism, which helped him greatly, and the Lord used him greatly!
 
Aug 25, 2018
147
100
28
#37
This is what the delusional dynamic equivalence proponents believe. But it is totally false.

1. All human beings are sinners.

2. All need to be saved.

3. Christ is the Savior of the world.

4. Therefore God commands all men everywhere to obey the Gospel -- repent and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ.
What is this supposed to be?
 
Aug 25, 2018
147
100
28
#38
Perhaps, just perhaps, there are scholars at your university who have a lack of experience in practical ministry.

In your opening post, you describe the dilemma of giving the gospel to people who are not well educated enough to comprehend scholarly works.
This is not a genuine dilemma.

Scholarly works have a very important place, but those who are trained in practical ministry have had no trouble, for millennia, in explaining doctrinal truths to less educated people. There is no dilemma here.

I am far from the best example of an evangelist, and even I have led people to Christ, in 3rd world countries, with no more appeal to "scholarly works" than my ability to draw in the dirt with a stick.

God Bless
Max

...
Mmm, yes. Such as those illiterate. I'm not saying they couldn't become literate and then learn to study, but everything is tainted from culture. One of the lecturers has spent considerable time in South Asia. Some of the required reading was books by Scott McKnight and David Liverpool.
I don't believe that scholarly works are necessary to lead others to Christ.
 

Lanolin

Well-known member
Dec 15, 2018
23,460
7,188
113
#39
I think translating scripture on one hand and explaining the gospel to people so they understand are two different things.
Not everyone is going to get it its even hidden to those who are lost.
For example Paul was at a greek forum and pointed to an inscription that said 'to an unknown God' he then used this as a starting point to explain the gospel to this audience of greeks and philosophers.

This is not to say when he was quoting scripture that he changed what it meant. But he would explain it, that is why we have expository preaching. The greeks at the time did have a translation the septugint and many people would read that translation, but it didnt mean the original hebrew was changed or the story changed to make it set in a greek world. Moses did not suddenly become like this emporor and prophets philosophers consulting the oracles of Delphi.

Most times when we read the Bible in translation we can know what it means and thank God there are word for word translations so we get the direct words, and even idioms literally translated for us because the Bible has many word pictures...not someone putting their own cultural ideas on top of it.
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,526
2,608
113
#40
Mmm, yes. Such as those illiterate. I'm not saying they couldn't become literate and then learn to study, but everything is tainted from culture. One of the lecturers has spent considerable time in South Asia. Some of the required reading was books by Scott McKnight and David Liverpool.
I don't believe that scholarly works are necessary to lead others to Christ.
Emergent Church, Postmodernism & Deconstruction

Maybe you're reading too many proponents of the emergent church movement, and you should consider reading some of it's detractors.

There are other views on how things should be done.
I think the deconstructionist views of postmodernism have crept too insidiously into the church.

I would recommend giving equal consideration to those with views opposing the emergent church.

If you don't consider some other views, I'm afraid you're going to be neutralized in the mire of deconstructionism.
Think about your own opening post.
Your teachers have you convinced it's virtually impossible to teach people in other cultures, or teach them with current translations... and yet people have been doing those very things perfectly well for a long, long time.
It's a bit nonsensical.

I recommend you devote some serious time, thought, and study, to other views.

...

...



...