Nukes for the Wahhabis.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
U

UnderGrace

Guest
#21
Tell yer what I think, Canadians for a long time have had it quite good, they've fallen asleep and allowed the greedy capitalists to do their own bidding and successive governments for the sake of relative peace and quiet have acquiesced to the GD's.

And then the idiot buys a pipeline.
Its called crony capitalism which is not really capitalism at all.

Greedy capitalists is really a meaningless term.
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
#22
I remember all the antics and lies of the BCTF when I was teaching.
The idea that teachers should form trade unions is somewhat bogus in my opinion as they aren't a part of the market economy.

Same with nurses.
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
#23
Rex makes some good points - but it looks like he's championing bizness as usual. Nothing wrong with "windmills" and solar as part of an energy policy - yeah Ontario hydro with it's overpaying for power from Independent Power Producers wasn't the best move.
 

NayborBear

Banned Serpent Seed Heresy
#24
Well this is pure speculation, but it would seem that the Globalists are using the biblical narrative as their playbook and I fear Christians will fall for it.

Having said that, sometimes I am really not sure......One World Government talk has been a concept in political science for a long time.

I think the elite are trying to make it happen.....time will tell, meanwhile I stay a way from the fake news media and try to know what is really happening, now that article form the BBC is very enlightening and worrisome.

I think yer right!
Rapture people already have fallen for it, as they're "gonna be gone!" (no threat)
WOF preachers, and their poor lamby-kins, are gonna "name it n claim it!" (not much threat)
Most denominations, turn their "loving blind eyes" to it! (no threat)
The radical left? Haven't a frigging clue. They just hate Christianity! (no threat)

Me? I just gonna keep "judging angels", fight the "good fight?" In discerning:
Revelation 17
17 For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled.

Til then? Doin' me best to remain?
 

Angela53510

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2011
11,786
2,957
113
#28
The idea that teachers should form trade unions is somewhat bogus in my opinion as they aren't a part of the market economy.

Same with nurses.
In 1987, when I started teaching in Surrey, after an absence of a few years, we were a professional Association. The BCTF, which had everyone's address, reps to drop "vote yes to a union" fliers in our mail boxes every few days, campaigned like mad to get a strong yes vote. I argued like mad, said we would soon be on strike, and no one listened. There was no "no" side.

The next year, my kids' school district was on strike. The year after, Surrey was on strike in May and June. What happened to all the grade 12 students preparing for exams at this time, against other districts that weren't in strike? I guess the ones with money hired tutors, and the others got nothing.

I became full on anti-union. Although, certainly in a big business, I can see the point, because it is all about the market place.

Hubby was also in a union, doing important work in ground instrumentation in airports to keep the planes and jets going. He had to sign an essential services/no strike close when he got the job. Can't stop politicians from flying, can you?
 

NayborBear

Banned Serpent Seed Heresy
#29
In 1987, when I started teaching in Surrey, after an absence of a few years, we were a professional Association. The BCTF, which had everyone's address, reps to drop "vote yes to a union" fliers in our mail boxes every few days, campaigned like mad to get a strong yes vote. I argued like mad, said we would soon be on strike, and no one listened. There was no "no" side.

The next year, my kids' school district was on strike. The year after, Surrey was on strike in May and June. What happened to all the grade 12 students preparing for exams at this time, against other districts that weren't in strike? I guess the ones with money hired tutors, and the others got nothing.

I became full on anti-union. Although, certainly in a big business, I can see the point, because it is all about the market place.

Hubby was also in a union, doing important work in ground instrumentation in airports to keep the planes and jets going. He had to sign an essential services/no strike close when he got the job. Can't stop politicians from flying, can you?
I gotta agree with ya Angela. The theory, or idea, of unions is a grand idea! As it keeps business owners somewhat honest. Not that some aren't anyway. But, there's enough greedy ones, where collective bargaining certainly has its advantages.
That is until "men" get a hold of it! Seems everything a man gets a hold of, he corrupts!
And, this is especially true for "public funded" occupations, that derive their income directly from taxes! Teachers, Police, Firemen, and especially government workers!
Least that's how it works in the "states."
Get better, eh? ;)
 

Jackson123

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2014
11,769
1,371
113
#30
House launches probe of US nuclear plan in Saudi Arabia:

The US is rushing to transfer sensitive nuclear power technology to Saudi Arabia, according to a new congressional report.

A Democrat-led House panel has launched an inquiry over concerns about the White House plan to build nuclear reactors across the kingdom.

Whistleblowers told the panel it could destabilise the Middle East by boosting nuclear weapon proliferation.

Firms linked to the president have reportedly pushed for these transfers.

The House of Representatives' Oversight Committee report notes that an inquiry into the matter is "particularly critical because the Administration's efforts to transfer sensitive US nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia appear to be ongoing".

President Donald Trump met nuclear power developers at the White House on 12 February to discuss building plants in Middle Eastern nations, including Saudi Arabia.

And Mr Trump's son-in-law, White House adviser Jared Kushner, will be touring the Middle East this month to discuss the economics of the Trump administration's peace plan.

Saudi Arabia has said it wants nuclear power in order to diversify its energy sources and help address growing energy needs.

But concerns around rival Iran developing nuclear technology are also at play, according to US media.

Previous negotiations for US nuclear technology ended after Saudi Arabia refused to agree to safeguards against using the tech for weaponry, but the Trump administration may not see these safeguards as mandatory, ProPublica reported.

Critics say giving Saudi Arabia access to US nuclear technology would spark a dangerous arms race in the volatile region.

The House report is based on whistleblower accounts and documents showing communications between Trump administration officials and nuclear power companies.

It states that "within the US, strong private commercial interests have been pressing aggressively for the transfer of highly sensitive nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia".

These commercial entities could "reap billions of dollars through contracts associated with constructing and operating nuclear facilities in Saudi Arabia".

Mr Trump is reportedly "directly engaged in the effort".

The White House has yet to comment on the report.

The report includes a timeline of events and names other administration officials who have been involved with the matter, including Energy Secretary Rick Perry, Mr Kushner, Mr Trump's inaugural committee chairman Tom Barrack and former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.

Flynn was found guilty of lying about Russian contacts by special counsel Robert Mueller as a part of the inquiry into alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

The commercial entities implicated in the report are:

IP3 International, a private company led by ex-military officers and security officials that organised a group of US companies to build "dozens of nuclear power plants" in Saudi Arabia

ACU Strategic Partners, a nuclear power consultancy led by British-American Alex Copson

Colony NorthStar, Mr Barrack's real estate investment firm

Flynn Intel Group, a consultancy and lobby set up by Michael Flynn

The report states that Flynn had decided to develop IP3's nuclear initiative, the Middle East Marshall Plan, during his transition, and while he was still serving as an advisor for the company.

In January 2017, National Security Council staff began to raise concerns that these plans were inappropriate and possibly illegal, and that Flynn had a potentially criminal conflict of interest.

Following Flynn's dismissal, however, IP3 continued to push for the Middle East Plans to be presented to Mr Trump.

According to the report, one senior official said the proposal was "a scheme for these generals to make some money".

Full article:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47296641

Looks like there is mushroom for war in the Middle East.
This is an indikator of end time, No matter what one of the end time of indikator is war and rumor of war. Everything go to that direction. More weapon mean preparation for war.

Bible say, the antichrist government Will win for 7 years.

We can not stop what bible prophecy. All we can do is pray do we not fall in to temtation and take the mark of the beast.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
#31
Rex makes some good points - but it looks like he's championing bizness as usual. Nothing wrong with "windmills" and solar as part of an energy policy - yeah Ontario hydro with it's overpaying for power from Independent Power Producers wasn't the best move.
Yes we know you are against business.

Solar power and wind energy provide minimal output compared to need, I have an idea lets turn the clock back a five hundred years and we can burn coal if we can find some.:cautious:
 

TabinRivCA

Well-known member
Oct 23, 2018
13,093
10,655
113
#32
Yes we know you are against business.

Solar power and wind energy provide minimal output compared to need, I have an idea lets turn the clock back a five hundred years and we can burn coal if we can find some.:cautious:
Who is 'we' … lol. Burn 'clean coal'? People are trying to help w/windmills, elec cars, solar etc not hurt us.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
#33
Who is 'we' … lol. Burn 'clean coal'? People are trying to help w/windmills, elec cars, solar etc not hurt us.
The we is the royal "we" :)

And the point was....... windmills and solar power cannot at this point in time provide sufficient or a reliable energy source.
 

TabinRivCA

Well-known member
Oct 23, 2018
13,093
10,655
113
#34
The we is the royal "we" :)

And the point was....... windmills and solar power cannot at this point in time provide sufficient or a reliable energy source.
They certainly can help esp in some areas as there are 'pros and cons' to most energy sources. Too bad someone stole Tesla's orig writings on energy. That 'coral castle' in Fla is still a mystery as to how that man moved those huge stones into place. I think 'someone' got their hands on that secret too.
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
#36
I'm surprised that this nuke deal is not getting more press - must be some dark money hushing this one.