global warming will destroy the Earth
- Thread starter memyselfi
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I think you read a fascinating book alright! Let's review. Some science speculated that Venus may have had water at one time. It's plausible, they supposed, but it's not a provable fact which you're making it out to be. Also, Venus atmosphere is 100 times more dense than Earth's. Plus it's incredibly dense cloud base is made up of sulfuric acid. Once more, it's atmosphere is so dense that sunlight and heat doesn't even reach its surface. Plus Venus is about 27 million miles closer to the sun. And where did anyone come up with the ideal that Venus' surface is hotter than the sun? No. It is not.
Also - what methane and other hydrocarbons did Venus have? Methane is largely biological - there's some geological but very little. Hydrocarbons? What hydrogen? What water?
Look - the book you read may be very factual in some areas and interesting in theory or a good speculative study and I, too, feel as though we are stewards of the earth and therefore responsible for its well being as much as we can. But this is exactly this kind of "basing an entire premise off a "fact" that is only speculation" that has permeated the global warming community and degraded its credibility. There was a IPCC chief (can't remember his name) with a quote something like " there has got to be a balance and degree of importance between what language is effective and that which is fact"
You indicated that global predictions were largely accurate. Here's an article - one of about a thousand I've read, that might help contradict that.
https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech...ts-have-been-wrong-about-virtually-everything
I can't reasonably say global change is not happening. No one can. I can, however, agree that man is playing a big role in a negative way. I personally believe it's mostly due to farming techniques - something like what we experienced in the great plains in the 30's except on a global scale. Here's a video briefly explaining the desertification of the earth largely due to poor farming. I believe this deserves study because it could literally create jobs, feed the poor, and create a more stable environment globally.
I believe in God of Israel and Jesus Christ is my savior by His Grace and I believe God created our planet as all planets and created it in such a way as to balance all life giving principals by the spinning of His mind. He made our earth a virtual garden of Eden. I believe a holistic, God led approach to life and farming and human production could be encouraged, learned and taught in the same way scripture very neatly outlines in our Holy Bible.
Please remember that our wisdom is God's folly and I believe some of these green deal ideas for "fixing" our global change problems would have catastrophic effects on most and deadly effects on the poor.
Also - what methane and other hydrocarbons did Venus have? Methane is largely biological - there's some geological but very little. Hydrocarbons? What hydrogen? What water?
Look - the book you read may be very factual in some areas and interesting in theory or a good speculative study and I, too, feel as though we are stewards of the earth and therefore responsible for its well being as much as we can. But this is exactly this kind of "basing an entire premise off a "fact" that is only speculation" that has permeated the global warming community and degraded its credibility. There was a IPCC chief (can't remember his name) with a quote something like " there has got to be a balance and degree of importance between what language is effective and that which is fact"
You indicated that global predictions were largely accurate. Here's an article - one of about a thousand I've read, that might help contradict that.
https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech...ts-have-been-wrong-about-virtually-everything
I can't reasonably say global change is not happening. No one can. I can, however, agree that man is playing a big role in a negative way. I personally believe it's mostly due to farming techniques - something like what we experienced in the great plains in the 30's except on a global scale. Here's a video briefly explaining the desertification of the earth largely due to poor farming. I believe this deserves study because it could literally create jobs, feed the poor, and create a more stable environment globally.
I believe in God of Israel and Jesus Christ is my savior by His Grace and I believe God created our planet as all planets and created it in such a way as to balance all life giving principals by the spinning of His mind. He made our earth a virtual garden of Eden. I believe a holistic, God led approach to life and farming and human production could be encouraged, learned and taught in the same way scripture very neatly outlines in our Holy Bible.
Please remember that our wisdom is God's folly and I believe some of these green deal ideas for "fixing" our global change problems would have catastrophic effects on most and deadly effects on the poor.
I choose to believe PhD scientists and professors instead of your arguments (which are frankly completely narrow. Venus was not always as it was; elements behave differently at difference temperatures etc: what I see from you is poor understanding). Feel free to post your scientific qualifications if you have an argument. But saying "no" to each argument, is not an argument.
All the info I provided was pretty elementary stuff. I mean, here's a link from NASA about Venus saying the same thing if that will help you. Try to remember that any speculative thinking on how things might have been millions of years ago is very subjective and not fact. It's fun, but just opinion.
https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/5-8/features/F_The_Planet_Venus_5-8.html
oh, and also, the temperature of the sun is just shy of 10,000 degrees F. Venus is about 860F
https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/5-8/features/F_The_Planet_Venus_5-8.html
oh, and also, the temperature of the sun is just shy of 10,000 degrees F. Venus is about 860F
Yes 17Bees, you have hit the nail on the head. We should thinks about how everything we do affects our environment. There are far worse things than global warming or cooling threatening our lives. Dumping chemicals onto our crops and improper storage of chemical waste is very harmful to our environment. It is all driven by money making.
They say the developed world waste about a third of the food they process while the third world goes hungry. We could do a lot better for the poor. Instead the drive for money and power precludes mankind from getting any better. If we don't do more about preventing nuclear war, that is what will most likely threaten our lively-hood.
They say the developed world waste about a third of the food they process while the third world goes hungry. We could do a lot better for the poor. Instead the drive for money and power precludes mankind from getting any better. If we don't do more about preventing nuclear war, that is what will most likely threaten our lively-hood.