E
I, too, have heard some say this. But when you trace through all they present, on this, it seems to me it is because they want to say that those who died (without Christ / apart from faith) in the past (prior to when this "mark" is implemented) have opportunity to be ultimately redeemed (after being dead for whatever length of time pays for their [supposedly lesser] wrong-doings), and it is only the beast and the false prophet (and anyone taking the "mark") who will have "altered" their DNA (by doing so) so as to be no longer human (as we know it) and thus (according to this view) not (or no longer) be redeemable.
I agree this view is (as you put it) "out there" (I think it's along the lines of the "serpent seed doctrine," if I recall... what do you think?)
I agree this view is (as you put it) "out there" (I think it's along the lines of the "serpent seed doctrine," if I recall... what do you think?)