Bible on Moon:50 Years Ago Today America's Apollo 11 Landed the First Humans on the Moon By the Science of Devout Christians
- Thread starter ronpal
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
S
I’m not interested in conspiracy theories. I’m just curious as to why you are interested.
Are you connected with NASA in any way?
How can you be so sure that the moon landing is a hoax?
From where are you getting your information about the hoax?
How can your sources be verified?
Even our former/current arch enemy, the Soviet Union/Russia was never in doubt.
But you are.
Tell me why.
Are you connected with NASA in any way?
How can you be so sure that the moon landing is a hoax?
From where are you getting your information about the hoax?
How can your sources be verified?
Even our former/current arch enemy, the Soviet Union/Russia was never in doubt.
But you are.
Tell me why.
Yeah... We saw this movie before. I'll just post a few paragraphs from this 15+year article from the New York Times:
Bush Calls for a Return to Space Exploration
By David Stout
Bush Calls for a Return to Space Exploration
By David Stout
- Jan. 14, 2004
Mr. Bush outlined a set of proposals "to carry astronauts beyond our orbit to other worlds" and to put human footsteps into the lunar dust for the first time in more than three decades.
- Mr. Bush also called for development of a new space-exploration vehicle, capable of ferrying astronauts and scientists to the space station but dedicated mainly to carry people deeper into space than ever before, by 2014. A Moon landing could come as early as THE FOLLOWING YEAR, Mr. Bush said, and very soon after that the Moon should become "a launching point to missions beyond."
- Mr. Bush's speech was inevitably reminiscent of President John F. Kennedy's speech to Congress on May 25, 1961. "I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth," he said.
BEAR IN MIND IT TOOK A SCANT 7 YEARS FROM WHEN KENNEDY ANNOUNCED PUTTING A MAN ON THE MOON UNTIL WE SUPPOSEDLY ACTUALLY DID.
- There is actual footage of a NASA official saying that we can't go there yet because we forgot how we did it before.
-
1
- Show all
Here's the thing PennEd. I've always liked you. Considered you a kind of spiritual mentor in many ways. I thought your advice and opinions were always sound, logical - you met all the criteria for a person that was a good father, family man, spiritually solid, and carried himself in a thoughtful and humble way.
With this kind of conceptual paradigm, where in the heck did you come up with this moon conspiracy? I'm really interested. I mean, do you have any idea how many people would have to be a part of this moon landing lie coupled with the huge percentage of blabbermouths in government work? Especially after they retire - if this was a gov't lie, there'd have to be a thousand books written about it by now. Fifty years? False conspiracies are the only thing with that kind of life.
They landed 6 times PennEd. Six. I don't want to start seeing PennHead instead of your actual handle.
With this kind of conceptual paradigm, where in the heck did you come up with this moon conspiracy? I'm really interested. I mean, do you have any idea how many people would have to be a part of this moon landing lie coupled with the huge percentage of blabbermouths in government work? Especially after they retire - if this was a gov't lie, there'd have to be a thousand books written about it by now. Fifty years? False conspiracies are the only thing with that kind of life.
They landed 6 times PennEd. Six. I don't want to start seeing PennHead instead of your actual handle.
-
1
- Show all
Thank you for your kind words. I can absolutely assure you I would have thought the idea beyond preposterous a little more than a year ago.
However I have always been one to never have condemnation without investigation. There are a multitude of evidences of varying degree of importance. Any one of which, by itself, would not lead one to the hoax conclusion. However in conjunction, and with the one piece of evidence I deem the smoking gun, I maintain that I am convinced no human has stepped foot on the moon.
But if you do have even a slightly open mind, why not watch the video above, with the absurd notion from the NASA official that we can't get back to the moon yet because we "lost" the the 1960s tech that enabled us to go 50 years ago. Then give me your comment onit.
But I have ZERO interest in conversing with anyone who simply want to ridicule and scorn.
However I have always been one to never have condemnation without investigation. There are a multitude of evidences of varying degree of importance. Any one of which, by itself, would not lead one to the hoax conclusion. However in conjunction, and with the one piece of evidence I deem the smoking gun, I maintain that I am convinced no human has stepped foot on the moon.
But if you do have even a slightly open mind, why not watch the video above, with the absurd notion from the NASA official that we can't get back to the moon yet because we "lost" the the 1960s tech that enabled us to go 50 years ago. Then give me your comment onit.
But I have ZERO interest in conversing with anyone who simply want to ridicule and scorn.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
I did watch the video. I thought his answer that they "lost" the technology was understated and misleading. The technology and the parts and the commodities are just no longer available. Maybe that would be a better answer. You think of all the molds for all the weird parts they had? Nobody keeps that stuff. It's difficult to even get parts for some cars of that era - think of a Apollo LEM! It had millions of parts. All the special tooling that won't work on anything else were discarded over time. You don't really see a lot of even medical equipment from the 60's. It's not really that technology was lost - it's more like it was outdated and just not used anymore. Even the guys that were the experts of that era are all dead or retired now and wouldn't even know how to go about rebuilding a SaturnV with today's metals and propellants, et al.
I work some with technology from the 90's that seems sooo obsolete. There's some modules and such that aren't designed to do what they can do now. Imagine trying to work with a buidling automated system from the 60's. It just won't work. The tooling, the limitations - it's not lost, it's just outdated.
I work some with technology from the 90's that seems sooo obsolete. There's some modules and such that aren't designed to do what they can do now. Imagine trying to work with a buidling automated system from the 60's. It just won't work. The tooling, the limitations - it's not lost, it's just outdated.
-
1
- Show all
I mean ok, but it seems patently silly.
My point is they built that thing with 1960s knowledge, using 1960s computers. EVEN if the plans magically disappeared and we couldn't simply manufacture the whole kit and caboodle from scratch, EVEN though those guys did it in LESS than 7 yrs, why wouldn't we simply build a MUCH better system and rocket than the Saturn? I have more computing power in my pocket with my phone, than all of NASA had at that time. We now have quantum computers that are faster than anything we can imagine. You are telling me we are too stupid NOW vs then to figure this out?
And I don't want to hear about the cost. That NEVER stopped us from doing ANYTHING. NASA has a $22 Billion budget for just this year.
But again, if this one blurb from this guy was all there was I would pooh pooh it as well. I might as well tell you the final piece that tipped the scales for me, and then fill in the other pieces if you are still interested. Some of the other stuff is certainly conspiratorial, but just because it is, shouldn't negate it as corroborating evidence. I'm talking about things like the fact that satan is the god of this world, a liar and deceiver. NASA's founding. That a LARGE contingency of the vital members of NASA, including many astronauts were/are Freemasons. But enough of that for now.
The thing that sealed the deal for me is the Van Allen radiation belts. These are rings of intense radiation surrounding the planet. It is why not only do I not believe we went to the moon, but also never left Earth's lower orbit. You realize that the International Space Station IS IN LOWER EARTH ORBIT? In fact, there are many accounts of space shuttle crew and ISS crew having serious eye problems due to the close exposure to the Belts.
But most astonishing is the admission from NASA itself that we have to solve the problem of the radiation belts, and outer space radiation, BEFORE we can go to Mars, or EVEN the moon!
Just focus on the info, not what the YouTube commentator inputs: