I don't see how physical laws permit it.
As I keep saying, this is where the real problem exists when it comes to people trying to understand the Flat Earth model.
Before you can truly understand the Flat Earth model, you absolutely MUST be able to "suspend" or "put aside" your
preconceived notions that are based on the Ball Earth model -- because, some of it
does not exist or
does not work in the Flat Earth model as/like it does in the Ball Earth model.
In the Flat Earth model, there is no such thing as 'gravity' (as defined by
modern science according to the Ball Earth model).
If there were such a thing - the sun, moon, and stars would have fallen to earth before the end of the creation week.
In the Flat Earth model, what keeps the sun, moon, and stars where they are?
We do not know. Our only valid answer is:
"God."
How He does it is not critical for us to know. (in order for us to believe it)
What we
do know is that it is
not 'gravity'.
~
How many times do I have to say it?
You CANNOT "prove" or "disprove" the Flat Earth model with Ball Earth model physics.
Why?
Because --- ALL of the modern science definition and description of the 'universe' is not REAL. Some of it is
made up. (The best example of such is no-doubt 'gravity'.)
Being able to discern what is and is not real is key.
This is where "real science" comes in - with clear demonstrable repeatable results.