There have been many extinctions, including two during the Devonian period, one during the Permian, one during the Triassic period, and one around 65 million years ago which cause the extinction of the dinosaurs. The rapid reemergence of new life forms caused evolutionary scientists to once again revise their theory to say that the rapid growth of new species was the result of the vacuum created by the mass extinctions. This, of course denies uniformitarianism, which has been a backbone of geology since it became a science. This, along with the Cambrian explosion denies the "long time periods" you are still preaching in your earlier post. There is no way that evolution can be applied to the "Cambrian explosion". If you deny "uniformitarianism", and declare that these "long time periods" must be repeated over and over, there is not enough time for your evolution to occur.
The new model, which resembles a cactus, more than a tree, has the same problems with the fossil record as before. Using the evolutionary model, the simpler, less complex lifeforms should be found in the trunk, not in the branches, where the more complex lifeforms should be. Yet you have the trilobite, which is extremely complex, having a compound eye, and an exoskeleton, as well as the ability to enroll itself in defense, in the trunk! So now evolutionists are considering a forest model, which is what the fossil record has revealed all along. (Actually it resembles a lawn)
I am not a scientist, and perhaps you can excuse me for not seeing evidence at times, but evolutionists, who claim to be not only scientists, but to have a consensus of knowledge, have been ignoring obvious evidence for decades. Maybe its time to realize that when the evidence points towards God, then just accept it!
The new model, which resembles a cactus, more than a tree, has the same problems with the fossil record as before. Using the evolutionary model, the simpler, less complex lifeforms should be found in the trunk, not in the branches, where the more complex lifeforms should be. Yet you have the trilobite, which is extremely complex, having a compound eye, and an exoskeleton, as well as the ability to enroll itself in defense, in the trunk! So now evolutionists are considering a forest model, which is what the fossil record has revealed all along. (Actually it resembles a lawn)
I am not a scientist, and perhaps you can excuse me for not seeing evidence at times, but evolutionists, who claim to be not only scientists, but to have a consensus of knowledge, have been ignoring obvious evidence for decades. Maybe its time to realize that when the evidence points towards God, then just accept it!