The genealogies of Christ: “the son of David"

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
posthuman said:
something that stands out in the chart immediately is that if Matthew is missing names "because of their sin" as @Nehemiah6 said, then Matthew should only have 4 kings in his list, not 14. there were very few good kings in either Judah or Israel's history.
Click to expand...

Yes I’ve seen and seems the sin wasn’t necessarily was what made or break them as being kings part of the genealogy
 
posthuman said:
let's not teach people answers that do not agree with the facts
Click to expand...
The facts are what we find written in the Bible, not what YOU THINK should be written ( in your human wisdom). It is God who decides what is written and what is not.
 
God inspired man written, if the Septuagint can be corrupted then so can other things.
 
Nehemiah6 said:
The facts are what we find written in the Bible, not what YOU THINK should be written ( in your human wisdom). It is God who decides what is written and what is not.
Click to expand...

God decided 1 Chronicles and 2 Kings would not give the same record that Matthew 1 does.
i think we ought to deal with that. what is a thread about Matthew 1 for, anyway?



80345871_2375743329197418_4658417916897656832_n.jpg
 
posthuman said:
God decided 1 Chronicles and 2 Kings would not give the same record that Matthew 1 does.
i think we ought to deal with that. what is a thread about Matthew 1 for, anyway?



View attachment 208702
Click to expand...
To show Jesus adopted but legal fathers paternal line back to king david that made Jesus legal heir to davids throne .. Luke showed Jesus actual genetic flesh composition from David .. Marys genealogy bypassed Jeconiahs curse while Joseph carried davids king line through Solomon then became cursed through Jeconiah .. Jesus may have legally inherited from josephs paternal line but He was begotten of God .. Born in a manger but born Lord of Lords and King of Kings
3 Jesus knowing that the Father had given all things into his hands, and that he was come from God, and went to God;
 
  • Like
Reactions: JamOn
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back