Featured Editorial in Christianity Today says: "Trump Should Be Removed from Office"
- Thread starter StrugglingTilMyReward
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
It is faux pas. It is French for "false step."
November 30, 2019President Trump is guilty of one “crime”: Beating hillary clinton . . .Thank God!
Hillary Clinton is not just a sore loser; she is a total loser
By Kenneth Eliasberg
As one can readily see, Hillary Clinton has been unable to recover from having lost the 2016 presidential election — a self-inflicted wound that she will never cop to. Or, possibly, an act of divine intervention. She has come up with well over a dozen reasons for her defeat — every one but the real one: that she is a loser, and not just a sore loser, but a total loser. She is incredibly incompetent, fundamentally dishonest, and criminally corrupt, and these are her good qualities.
In addition, she is bereft of a trace of integrity or character, has absolutely no judgment, and is devoid of people skills (she's very easy to dislike and distrust, making it also easy for people exposed to her to become a member of her deplorables). The 2016 race was hers to lose, and by failing to listen to advice on where to campaign, she managed to do just that — lose! Thank God — a Hillary Clinton presidency would be the last nail in America's coffin....
...But for present purposes, I would just like to focus on the liberties that she has always taken with the truth. When Bill Safire of the New York Times called her a congenital liar, he flattered her. You see, the Clintons don't just tell lies; they live them...
...The point here is that Hillary had no choice but to stay in her marriage. Without her connection to Bill Clinton, Hillary could not be nominated for, let alone be elected to, dog-catcher of even the smallest of communities. Her successes in securing all of these positions was achieved by attaching herself to Bill's coattails and riding them to each one of these positions...
...So why did Hillary lose the 2016 presidential election? Because she's Hillary Clinton, a born loser. And, more to the point, Hillary Clinton belongs in the Big House, not in the White House.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...t_just_a_sore_loser_she_is_a_total_loser.html
On topic, how many of us have ever done anything that could be used as an assault on our character on film or have witnesses we no longer have much contact with (if any). My point is that character assaults could be used against anyone, regardless of whether they are verifiable or not.
Anyone and everyone's name can be dragged through the dirt.
I'm not in any way comparing political figures to Jesus, but think about his very name being a byword among many today, or a cultural expletive. The pharisees seemingly tried quite hard to smear him and trap him.
So for me that shows that it can happen to anyone. Again, valid assertion or not...does an individual's personal past that precludes criminal convictions have any bearing in politics?
I'm not a fan of smear campaigns. It doesn't matter who you are and what you've done...unless it has direct relevancy to the topic at hand, I see it as strongly discouraged.
Anyone and everyone's name can be dragged through the dirt.
I'm not in any way comparing political figures to Jesus, but think about his very name being a byword among many today, or a cultural expletive. The pharisees seemingly tried quite hard to smear him and trap him.
So for me that shows that it can happen to anyone. Again, valid assertion or not...does an individual's personal past that precludes criminal convictions have any bearing in politics?
I'm not a fan of smear campaigns. It doesn't matter who you are and what you've done...unless it has direct relevancy to the topic at hand, I see it as strongly discouraged.
K
kaylagrl
Guest
No, it's not moving the needle at all, nor should it. Billy and his son both voted for Trump. And this liberal editor is on his way out the door,this was his parting shot. Any mag that calls themselves Christianity Today and runs an article saying Margret Sanger wasn't wrong in her beliefs tells me all I need to know.
K
kaylagrl
Guest
They started it, did they not expect people to respond strongly to being told they're not Christian because they voted for Trump?!
it's apparently fine if worldly politics infect Christianity as long as it's republican worldly partisanship.
*shrug*
You miss the entire point. Christians are aware of what's happening to our president and by a Left wing that has turned toward the dark side and against all that America stands for and stands against. God continues to bless America despite the best efforts of our enemies both foreign and domestic.
God protect continually our leadership and our people. Amen.
probably the same way people might respond to being told they're not Christian because they didn't vote for him.
unclear about 'who started it' lol
we're such sheep.
You are right Whispered, the liberals were appalled when Trump got elected. That is all this is about, trying to defame him. Some Democrats that went along, like that woman rep from Oklahoma, just because of party pressure are being held accountable.
On the issue of Trump: I must ask what did he do that was so immoral. I was saddened that he was the only conservative choice in 2016, but he was. If he has let someone down, I think their expectations were set too high to begin with. I mean, let's face it; will any worldly politician satisfy our Christian heritage? I think not.
He didn't let me down. In fact he's done more than I expected like help pass the mission act. so vets don't have to travel scores of miles to see medical specialists. Obama Care was so Rube Goldberg it was bound to fail from the beginning.
I just didn't expect much to begin with. I wish we'd get a Candidate with the heart of a missionary that's eloquent of speech and as attentive to details as a tax auditor and will put the working class first. I don't see any on the horizon.
If you find one, let me know and I'll go vote for HIM and not his party. I conscientiously object to party politics.
I think the moment an opinion piece implies or states such a thing emphatically, the author of said piece cannot be construed as articulating their personal opinion without adding the animus engendered from the whole of the Left and their talking points to date to that opinion piece in CT.
What the author of the CT opinion piece can't get around is this, from The Hill: "...Eighty-one percent of self-described white, born-again or evangelical Christians voted for Trump in 2016, and 78 percent said they approved of his job performance as of March 2019, according to the Pew Research Center.
Born again or Evangelical? Evangelical Christians Are born again or they are frauds. How many didn't vote?
