There is no remission of sins with out the blood , & Cain's sacrifice there was no Blood , That is why GOD didn't except Cain's sacrifice. Hebrews 9:22 tells us this .
I would offer. Corrupted flesh and blood is used to represent the mutual workings of the Father and Son. . as one work needed to complete our salvation and therefore establish the government of God. Loving authority
+ willing submissiveness
= the peace of God that surpasses natural mans understanding. .
Even though the life of the flesh is
in the blood .Blood without the spirit essence of life has nothing to offer . Literal blood without the Spirit of God as the breath has no use. Jesus said of his own flesh and blood it profits for nothing, zero. . . being corrupted.
It is the Spirit that gives birth to our new born again spirit. Jesus says his words are Spirit they quicken our souls as he works in us with us.
The sacrifice is a living suffering sacrifice. Blood with out life must be poured out so that it can return to the field of clay from where it was formed from. Just like the blood of Jesus The blood was poured out at the foot of the altar (the cross) to keep with the old testament law. .Again to show spirit life was given in jeopardy of ones own . God who is not a man as us cannot die.
In that way according to the parable in John 6 .It would seem the Holy Spirit uses the occasion to help build on a old testament parable. . comparing the spiritual understanding of the what I would call living gospel to one and the unseen to other, Or faith (the unseen) to faith (this unseen)
It can I beleive be seen according to the hermeneutic prescription 1 Corinthians 2:
Note . . . .
(purple in parenthesis) by added comment as a opinion
1 Corinthians 2: 13;14 Which things also we speak,
not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the
Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing
spiritual (unseen things of faith) things with
spiritual.
(unseen things offaith) But the natural man receiveth not the
things of the
Spirit of God:
(unseen things offaith) for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are
spiritually (unseen things of faith) discerned.
John six in regard to that parable. Drink the blood eat the flesh. It offended many of the disciples . They knowing the law forbid the drinking of blood. It must be poured out as the foot of the altar over and over they are remined in the Old testament. Many disciples walked away. Therefore not understanding the parable it remained a unsolved mysterious riddle. Peter was given the faith to understanding shown by his agreement that the corrupted flesh profits for nothing. Peter said: to whom can we go you have words of eternal life, words that work to create life.
To drink the blood and eat the flesh to one does bring new life over, over ,over and over. Catholics call it the Real Presence. literally in wonderment mysteriously eating and drinking wine, the blood of the grapes as
if it was the literal Real blood of Jesus and the literal flesh of what they call Christ.
While the Jehovah witness forbid it even so much as refusing a blood transfusion. Both miss the gospel meaning found by comparing it spiritual understanding another parable
Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye
eat the flesh of the Son of man, and
drink his blood, ye have no
life in you.Whoso
eateth my flesh, and
drinketh my blood, hath
eternal life; and
I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He that
eateth my flesh, and
drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him. As the
living Father hath sent me, and I
live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me. This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever. These things said he in the synagogue, as he taught in Capernaum. Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an
hard saying;
who can hear it? John 6:53- 60
Those who had faith like Peter did hear it. He might of compared its unseen understanding to another parable one found twice in the Old testament, as two witnesses.
There David is used to signify the Son of man, Jesus. An Old testament y type. David in a place of thirsting to hear the word of his father in heaven the Lord being in the land of the giants, the valley of Rephaim. David was imprisoned Bethlehem, the city of bread used to represent flesh . .desiring a taste for the gospel the water of the well by the gate again to represent Christ. . God sent three mighty men . Three to establish the end of the matter. Men or re-noun as sons of God .Giants of faith
Now
three of the thirty captains went down to the rock to David, into the cave of Adullam; and the host of the Philistines encamped in
the valley of Rephaim. And
David was then
in the hold, and the Philistines' garrison was then at
Bethlehem. And David longed, and said, Oh that one would give me drink of the
water of the well of Bethlehem, that is at the gate! And the three brake through the host of the Philistines, and
drew water out of the well of
Bethlehem, that was by the
gate, and took it, and brought it to David:
but David would not drink of it, but
poured it out to
the Lord. And said,
My God forbid it me, that
I should do this thing: shall I drink the blood of these men that have
put their lives in jeopardy? for
with the jeopardy of their lives they brought
it. Therefore he
would not drink it. These things did these three mightiest.2 Samuel 23:15 -19
Jesus with his Spirit life he gave
it in jeopardy of Him and the Father the mutual work of God .