Who will populate the earth in the 1000 year Reign
- Thread starter rhern
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E
which one?
The Israel of romans 9 (spiritual)
or the Israel of romans 11. (physical.. partly blinded)
they are not the same
there is no debate between us and has not been since we started,, because you are not open to discuss what the actual verses say (starting with Dan 9 this morning), you have it in your head you know. so you will not even look at specific passages.
again, Your using theology to interpret scripture instead of letting scripture create your theology.
thats a dangerous thing to do. and destroys any kind of serious discussion
The Israel of romans 9 (spiritual)
or the Israel of romans 11. (physical.. partly blinded)
they are not the same
there is no debate between us and has not been since we started,, because you are not open to discuss what the actual verses say (starting with Dan 9 this morning), you have it in your head you know. so you will not even look at specific passages.
again, Your using theology to interpret scripture instead of letting scripture create your theology.
thats a dangerous thing to do. and destroys any kind of serious discussion
E
I have
there is physical
Israel which was given earthly promises
there is spiritual
Isreal which was given heavenly promises
you can not interpret prophesy or romans without getting the context correct
I showed this to you in the passage you refuse to discuss it so end of discussion until you look at the passage itself
there is physical
Israel which was given earthly promises
there is spiritual
Isreal which was given heavenly promises
you can not interpret prophesy or romans without getting the context correct
I showed this to you in the passage you refuse to discuss it so end of discussion until you look at the passage itself
Right, and this is pretty funny because Dispensationalists will have a hissy fit if non-dispensationalists cannot find explicit statements in Scripture to support anything against dispensationalism...but they will not support their own claims such as their position on this missing week.
They claim, in essence, the prophetic clock stopped when the Jews rejected Jesus as Messiah..but that's their claim and not something they can prove.
They have one set of standards for those that disagree with them, and another set of standards for themselves.
In my world that is called hypocrisy...and it was a very dominant trait of the cult that I belonged to, as a young man.
They claim, in essence, the prophetic clock stopped when the Jews rejected Jesus as Messiah..but that's their claim and not something they can prove.
They have one set of standards for those that disagree with them, and another set of standards for themselves.
In my world that is called hypocrisy...and it was a very dominant trait of the cult that I belonged to, as a young man.
-
1
- Show all
What you seem to be doing is taking a couple of verses (out of context I might add) and coloring your misunderstanding of those [few] ONTO the vast majority of the REST of the gospels [accounts]...
For example, you are continually suggesting (it seems to me) that "the kingdom OF THE heavenS" has nothing to do with an earthly-located setting, but rather could better be translated (according to your view) as "UP IN Heaven" (which is not what the phrase is referring to).
I'm going to go search for some posts I've made in the past, that cover some of these flawed ideas that you are presenting in these most recent posts.
brb...
For example, you are continually suggesting (it seems to me) that "the kingdom OF THE heavenS" has nothing to do with an earthly-located setting, but rather could better be translated (according to your view) as "UP IN Heaven" (which is not what the phrase is referring to).
I'm going to go search for some posts I've made in the past, that cover some of these flawed ideas that you are presenting in these most recent posts.
brb...