He was, but he admitted that it came to naught because without Jesus he was on his way to hell
Who is the ones that is taken ? And who is the ones that are left ?
- Thread starter bud62
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
He was, but he admitted that it came to naught because without Jesus he was on his way to hell
“But the spiritual man tries all things [he examines, investigates, inquires into, questions, and discerns all things], yet is himself to be put on trial and judged by no one [he can read the meaning of everything, but no one can properly discern or appraise or get an insight into him].” 1 Corinthians 2:15 (AMP)
How did Paul preach from the OT without thoroughly knowing it?He was, but he admitted that it came to naught because without Jesus he was on his way to hell
He was educated in the OT replaced by the NT. = it does not apply to those educated in the NT.
The NT did not exist so he could not study it. He was one of the authors
Those educated in the NT can also be wrong. We need the whole Bible
But we have it now and need to learn it in line with the early church creeds.The NT did not exist so he could not study it. He was one of the authors
Yes exactly, as I said. It doesnt matter if you are or are not highly educated. Those who are of the Lord are of the Lord and will be right.
And how do you know if you are right without a thorough knowledge of scripture? = lots of study.
...and had to unlearn it all after the baptism in the Holy Spirit
Didnt you see Dave's other thread? Thats not for today. Salvation cancelled! That was only before the bible canon was complete. Now we dont need salvation anymore.
Truth can be multifaceted.
Many debates are 2 sides not realizing the mountain has more than one side
By the time the Holy Spirit got done with him he had a boneyard of discarded " 'truths' of education"
Every sentence of the ot paul saw through the prism of the law and priesthood. He saw nothing in the ot through the correct prism.
That is why I put "truths" in quotation marks.
His truth was perverted.
His entire revelation was downloaded by the Holy Spirit.
The ot was relearned as well
No
I never said that.
You think his antichrist rampage was due to his understanding of the scripture?
This seems pretty selective to me. What parts of the Bible can we then leave out? Who determined it?
Doesn’t make sense. We need to read the whole Bible and apply it to our lives.
You are right that Paul taught Yeshua from the OT and all he left behind was the manmade doctrine in the Talmud.
I can see it either way. Works for either camp.
In the tsunami in Japan, the boats were taken away first.
Nobody would rationally think people are taken away before a boat.
Makes no sense