Bible versions-Is there only one?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Is there only one true version of the Bible?

  • Total voters
    21
J

John146

Senior Member
#122
Jan 13, 2016
17,129
3,689
113
#122
Aerials1978 said:
There are many translations and revised versions of Bible’s(NIV, Amplified, King James, Living Translation, AS). Did any of these lose essential Biblical meanings and teachings via the translation process? If so, which ones? If true, should those versions be avoided by Believers?
Click to expand...
The better question is, who believes they can hold God’s word in their hands to read and study?
 
JamOn

JamOn

Banned
#124
Jun 10, 2019
4,304
1,659
113
#124
John146 said:
I’m redeemed through the blood of Jesus. And you? Of course you are.
Click to expand...
As the Ephesians 1:7 states as well, the same issue of why is the same as the other, not every mentioning of salvation in the Bible has to include the blood
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#125
Jan 13, 2016
17,129
3,689
113
#125
Roughsoul1991 said:
Yes there is a timeline of Bibles and all influences the next. But that is the point. I know some people who believe the KJV is the closest to the original language just because they believe it is the oldest English translation we have.

Which is easily proven false.
Click to expand...
Nope, just the seventh in line, you know, the number of God’s completion.
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#129
Jan 13, 2016
17,129
3,689
113
#129
JamOn said:
As the Ephesians 1:7 states as well, the same issue of why is the same as the other, not every mentioning of salvation in the Bible has to include the blood
Click to expand...
Is the love of money the root of all evil? Or is the love of money a root of all kinds of evil? One is telling the truth, the others are lying. I wonder why? $$$$
 
Subhumanoidal

Subhumanoidal

Well-known member
#134
Sep 17, 2018
4,060
3,173
113
#134
StrugglingTilMyReward said:
I have to admit to having some affinity for the language of the KJV, the more formal terms like thee and thou....to me they add weight and signficance to the words I'm reading or saying. A great example of this is the 23rd Psalm. To me the meaning is the same whether its the KJ, Revised Standard, or likely any other...but words like:

"He restoreth my soul: he leadeth me in the paths of righteousness..." I find the language more reverant. However there's no real difference with the RSV's: "he restores my soul. He leads me in paths of righteousness..."

Of course it may be that I'm just old, but the language of the KJ.....it just strikes me as Biblical, set apart from every day language.

There's another aspect to the KJV, for those who like to preach against things....the word abomination is most prevalent in the King James. The RSV uses words like detestable instead....and while abomination and detestable mean the same thing, abomination sounds so much more fire and brimstone.
Click to expand...
Of course that's simply outdated language and that has zero bearing on any degree of spirituality.
Also there was a time when that Was common language, so the notion that it's less common language also means nothing.
Debating over two words of the same meaning but one "sounding" more severe does not make one more valid than the other.
Lastly the KJV language is not biblical. Biblical language was Not English, in any form. All of your reasonings are purely superficial and require your subjective opinion. There is not a single spiritual basis for anything you stated.
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#135
Jan 13, 2016
17,129
3,689
113
#135
Subhumanoidal said:
Of course that's simply outdated language and that has zero bearing on any degree of spirituality.
Also there was a time when that Was common language, so the notion that it's less common language also means nothing.
Debating over two words of the same meaning but one "sounding" more severe does not make one more valid than the other.
Lastly the KJV language is not biblical. Biblical language was Not English, in any form. All of your reasonings are purely superficial and require your subjective opinion. There is not a single spiritual basis for anything you stated.
Click to expand...
Thank you for your opinion.
 
Lucy-Pevensie

Lucy-Pevensie

Senior Member
#137
Dec 20, 2017
9,386
5,725
113
#137
Aerials1978 said:
Of course I do just as you do. I know where this going. I prefer the NIV as that’s what I always used.
Click to expand...
Me as well. For 31 years I've used the NIV. I first got it because I find the KJV too awkward for deep study.
I have some other translations for reference too but the NIV has always been my favourite.
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#139
Jan 13, 2016
17,129
3,689
113
#139
Lucy-Pevensie said:
Me as well. For 31 years I've used the NIV. I first got it because I find the KJV too awkward for deep study.
I have some other translations for reference too but the NIV has always been my favourite.
Click to expand...
Is Jesus God’s only begotten Son, or His one and only Son? Huge difference! Take care of the little things, then go deep.😉.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.