Refuting The Cessationism Doctrine: Spiritual Gifts, Tongues, Miracles Haven’t Ceased Since Pentecost!!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jan 17, 2020
4,792
736
113
And it would do you any good if I told you I've interpreted and confirmed the interpretation of a message given in tongues .. If Jesus didn't keep folks like you away could any one have any peace ?
If you record the message and give it to several Pentecostals, you'll get as many different interpretations too.
 

bojack

Well-known member
Dec 16, 2019
2,309
1,006
113
If you record the message and give it to several Pentecostals, you'll get as many different interpretations too.
Here's a testimony I heard once .. A young boy who couldn't talk plain went to a church and got hands laid on him , he fell and from that point on he talked fine, his own mother said ''God didn't heal you, you bumped your head and it loosed your tongue''
If you need proof, why faith ? Nobody cares if you or anybody believes, what has Jesus did for you ?
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
The only gifts that have ceased are the gifts listed in 1 Cor 13:8. The list has only three gifts that cease or end. All the other gifts continue and will continue.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,163
1,792
113
If you record the message and give it to several Pentecostals, you'll get as many different interpretations too.
I wouldn't say that is not possible. I don't think anyone would claim that everything that claims to be a gift is. I have not interpreted tongues in church, but some people I have spoken to who have interpreted tongues have experienced receiving the interpretation, and someone else giving the same interpretation before they did. My college roommate experienced that, and so did a good friend of mine, and one or two other people I have discussed it with. I've gotten words of knowledge about people, only to hear the same thing spoken in a prophecy before I shared anything. That's happened to me at least twice that i can think about.

Similar things happen with prophecy, where one person gets it, and another shares it first. There are also prophecies you hear when you go one place, and someone else says the same thing or parts of it when you go elsewhere and someone else prophesies over you. I've experienced this. Paul said that the Spirit witnessed in every city that bonds and affliction awaited him.

There are also prophecies regarding things the one prophesying could not naturally know, prophesying what another person was thinking or thinks during the prophecy, details about the person's life. Sometimes the person prophesying doesn't quite understand all the significance of the details being prophesied.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,163
1,792
113
Prove your point with documented signs and wonders. There should be plenty these days.
Have you read 'Miracles' by Craig Keener to look at his documentation. Don't pretend there is nothing out there if you haven't researched and have not looked up any sources people refer you to when you ask for them.

I notice a pattern. You post an unbiblical idea, it is refuted with scripture. Then you repeat the same idea again. You ignore evidence and continue repeating the same thing.
 
Jan 17, 2020
4,792
736
113
Have you read 'Miracles' by Craig Keener to look at his documentation. Don't pretend there is nothing out there if you haven't researched and have not looked up any sources people refer you to when you ask for them.

I notice a pattern. You post an unbiblical idea, it is refuted with scripture. Then you repeat the same idea again. You ignore evidence and continue repeating the same thing.
Paul no longer healed his sick friends in the Epistles. Why?

“Erastus abode at Corinth: but Trophimus have I left at Miletum sick.” (2 Timothy 4:20) (KJV 1900)

“Drink no longer water, but use a little wine for thy stomach’s sake and thine often infirmities.” (1 Timothy 5:23) (KJV 1900)

“Brethren, I beseech you, be as I am; for I am as ye are: ye have not injured me at all. Ye know how through infirmity of the flesh I preached the gospel unto you at the first. And my temptation which was in my flesh ye despised not, nor rejected; but received me as an angel of God, even as Christ Jesus. Where is then the blessedness ye spake of? for I bear you record, that, if it had been possible, ye would have plucked out your own eyes, and have given them to me.” (Galatians 4:12–15) (KJV 1900)

(alternate translation of the above passage) “you know that previously I preached the gospel to you because of a physical illness. You did not despise or reject me though my physical condition was a trial for you. On the contrary, you received me as an angel of God, as Christ Jesus Himself.” (Galatians 4:13–14)(HCSB)

“What happened to this sense of being blessed you had? For I testify to you that, if possible, you would have torn out your eyes and given them to me.” (Galatians 4:15)(HCSB)

“For he longed after you all, and was full of heaviness, because that ye had heard that he had been sick. For indeed he was sick nigh unto death: but God had mercy on him; and not on him only, but on me also, lest I should have sorrow upon sorrow.” (Philippians 2:26–27) (KJV 1900)

Paul left Trophimus in Miletus when he was sick (II Tim 4:20), and Epaphroditus was sick to the point of death (Phil 2:27). Timothy was encouraged to use wine for his stomach ailments (1 Tim 5:23). God never removed Paul's thorn in the flesh (II Cor 12:1-10).
 
Jan 17, 2020
4,792
736
113
I wouldn't say that is not possible. I don't think anyone would claim that everything that claims to be a gift is. I have not interpreted tongues in church, but some people I have spoken to who have interpreted tongues have experienced receiving the interpretation, and someone else giving the same interpretation before they did. My college roommate experienced that, and so did a good friend of mine, and one or two other people I have discussed it with. I've gotten words of knowledge about people, only to hear the same thing spoken in a prophecy before I shared anything. That's happened to me at least twice that i can think about.

Similar things happen with prophecy, where one person gets it, and another shares it first. There are also prophecies you hear when you go one place, and someone else says the same thing or parts of it when you go elsewhere and someone else prophesies over you. I've experienced this. Paul said that the Spirit witnessed in every city that bonds and affliction awaited him.

There are also prophecies regarding things the one prophesying could not naturally know, prophesying what another person was thinking or thinks during the prophecy, details about the person's life. Sometimes the person prophesying doesn't quite understand all the significance of the details being prophesied.
You show that you not only do not have the gift. You also do not understand its nature according to scripture. Also, you do not understand the history of Azusa Street and its voodoo origins.
 
Jan 17, 2020
4,792
736
113
Here's a testimony I heard once .. A young boy who couldn't talk plain went to a church and got hands laid on him , he fell and from that point on he talked fine, his own mother said ''God didn't heal you, you bumped your head and it loosed your tongue''
If you need proof, why faith ? Nobody cares if you or anybody believes, what has Jesus did for you ?
That's the problem, it's all hearsay with no documentation. Faith comes from scripture. But you haven't any to support your claims. The prayer of faith is not the same as the signs and wonders gifts nobody has today, but claim to have.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,163
1,792
113
Paul no longer healed his sick friends in the Epistles. Why?

“Erastus abode at Corinth: but Trophimus have I left at Miletum sick.” (2 Timothy 4:20) (KJV 1900)

“Drink no longer water, but use a little wine for thy stomach’s sake and thine often infirmities.” (1 Timothy 5:23) (KJV 1900)

“Brethren, I beseech you, be as I am; for I am as ye are: ye have not injured me at all. Ye know how through infirmity of the flesh I preached the gospel unto you at the first. And my temptation which was in my flesh ye despised not, nor rejected; but received me as an angel of God, even as Christ Jesus. Where is then the blessedness ye spake of? for I bear you record, that, if it had been possible, ye would have plucked out your own eyes, and have given them to me.” (Galatians 4:12–15) (KJV 1900)

(alternate translation of the above passage) “you know that previously I preached the gospel to you because of a physical illness. You did not despise or reject me though my physical condition was a trial for you. On the contrary, you received me as an angel of God, as Christ Jesus Himself.” (Galatians 4:13–14)(HCSB)

“What happened to this sense of being blessed you had? For I testify to you that, if possible, you would have torn out your eyes and given them to me.” (Galatians 4:15)(HCSB)

“For he longed after you all, and was full of heaviness, because that ye had heard that he had been sick. For indeed he was sick nigh unto death: but God had mercy on him; and not on him only, but on me also, lest I should have sorrow upon sorrow.” (Philippians 2:26–27) (KJV 1900)

Paul left Trophimus in Miletus when he was sick (II Tim 4:20), and Epaphroditus was sick to the point of death (Phil 2:27). Timothy was encouraged to use wine for his stomach ailments (1 Tim 5:23). God never removed Paul's thorn in the flesh (II Cor 12:1-10).
I don't see how this supports your theory.

Paul was sick early on. His first visit to the Galatians is probably recorded in Acts 14 since those cities were in the province of Galatia. At the latest it is clearly by Acts 16 because the province of Galatia is clearly mentioned as a place he went. So he got sick early on, then did great miracles and healed a lot of people.

Your theory seems to be that he could just heal people automatically wherever he went, without regard to the will of God, whether he had faith for it, or whether they did. In one of the Lyaconian cities, he saw that a lame man had faith to be healed and told the man to stand up and he did. The faith of the sick person was a factor, as we can see from the words of Jesus, repeatedly, in the Gospels.

You also do not know if God never healed his sick friends later on in his ministry. You do not know that Epaphroditus was not healed through the laying on of Paul's hands or the hands of other believers. God had mercy on him. He was healed. We aren't told the details.

The fact that God heals supernaturally does not do away with our need to take basic care of our health, either.

Paul had an infirmity early on in his ministry, then did miracles and healed people. By the end of Acts, he healed all the sick brought to him on an island by the power of God. You have no case from scripture for a graduate decline of the gifts over time. The data does not fit the theory.
 
Jan 17, 2020
4,792
736
113
I don't see how this supports your theory.

Paul was sick early on. His first visit to the Galatians is probably recorded in Acts 14 since those cities were in the province of Galatia. At the latest it is clearly by Acts 16 because the province of Galatia is clearly mentioned as a place he went. So he got sick early on, then did great miracles and healed a lot of people.

Your theory seems to be that he could just heal people automatically wherever he went, without regard to the will of God, whether he had faith for it, or whether they did. In one of the Lyaconian cities, he saw that a lame man had faith to be healed and told the man to stand up and he did. The faith of the sick person was a factor, as we can see from the words of Jesus, repeatedly, in the Gospels.

You also do not know if God never healed his sick friends later on in his ministry. You do not know that Epaphroditus was not healed through the laying on of Paul's hands or the hands of other believers. God had mercy on him. He was healed. We aren't told the details.

The fact that God heals supernaturally does not do away with our need to take basic care of our health, either.

Paul had an infirmity early on in his ministry, then did miracles and healed people. By the end of Acts, he healed all the sick brought to him on an island by the power of God. You have no case from scripture for a graduate decline of the gifts over time. The data does not fit the theory.
If he had the gifts he would have healed them instead of sympathizing with them.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,163
1,792
113
That's the problem, it's all hearsay with no documentation. Faith comes from scripture. But you haven't any to support your claims. The prayer of faith is not the same as the signs and wonders gifts nobody has today, but claim to have.
Have you looked up the documentation? Craig's Keener's book is over 1200 pages. That's just one source. Have you even bothered searching Google scholar?

People have also shown you scripture. Your position is that certain scriptures are not true or applicable anymore. Your interpretations of scripture do not stand up to scrutiny. This has been pointed out to you in detail. You respond by repeating the same arguments in two or three sentence posts like the one above.
 
Jan 17, 2020
4,792
736
113
Have you looked up the documentation? Craig's Keener's book is over 1200 pages. That's just one source. Have you even bothered searching Google scholar?

People have also shown you scripture. Your position is that certain scriptures are not true or applicable anymore. Your interpretations of scripture do not stand up to scrutiny. This has been pointed out to you in detail. You respond by repeating the same arguments in two or three sentence posts like the one above.
“Erastus abode at Corinth: but Trophimus have I left at Miletum sick.” (2 Timothy 4:20) (KJV 1900)

“Drink no longer water, but use a little wine for thy stomach’s sake and thine often infirmities.” (1 Timothy 5:23) (KJV 1900)

“Brethren, I beseech you, be as I am; for I am as ye are: ye have not injured me at all. Ye know how through infirmity of the flesh I preached the gospel unto you at the first. And my temptation which was in my flesh ye despised not, nor rejected; but received me as an angel of God, even as Christ Jesus. Where is then the blessedness ye spake of? for I bear you record, that, if it had been possible, ye would have plucked out your own eyes, and have given them to me.” (Galatians 4:12–15) (KJV 1900)

(alternate translation of the above passage) “you know that previously I preached the gospel to you because of a physical illness. You did not despise or reject me though my physical condition was a trial for you. On the contrary, you received me as an angel of God, as Christ Jesus Himself.” (Galatians 4:13–14)(HCSB)

“What happened to this sense of being blessed you had? For I testify to you that, if possible, you would have torn out your eyes and given them to me.” (Galatians 4:15)(HCSB)

“For he longed after you all, and was full of heaviness, because that ye had heard that he had been sick. For indeed he was sick nigh unto death: but God had mercy on him; and not on him only, but on me also, lest I should have sorrow upon sorrow.” (Philippians 2:26–27) (KJV 1900)

Paul left Trophimus in Miletus when he was sick (II Tim 4:20), and Epaphroditus was sick to the point of death (Phil 2:27). Timothy was encouraged to use wine for his stomach ailments (1 Tim 5:23). God never removed Paul's thorn in the flesh (II Cor 12:1-10).

How do you get around this?
 

bojack

Well-known member
Dec 16, 2019
2,309
1,006
113
That's the problem, it's all hearsay with no documentation. Faith comes from scripture. But you haven't any to support your claims. The prayer of faith is not the same as the signs and wonders gifts nobody has today, but claim to have.
Here's the guy Bobby Burdette .. I went to a tent revival he brought to our town .. People were getting healed and all kinds of things .. One night he had mentioned God had told him he would have a ministry in Haiti .. He also said that God told him there was 4 people there who was supposed to donate 100 dollars each .. The plate had already been passed and I had already give .. Three people had come up and give 100 dollars , he said there's 1 more and he waited .. I sat there and thought ''here we go'' then I thought I'm not going to sit here and let him beg, I'll give a hundred .. Then I stood up to go forward and he looked me in the eye and pointed at me and said ''it's not you, sit down'' then a minute later another person got up and come forward .. This guy refused my hundred dollars ..
Later when I found his ministry in Haiti he had finally started I became a supporter until I retired a couple years ago .. I supported many ministries local, national, and international .. So eat dust serpent
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,163
1,792
113
You show that you not only do not have the gift. You also do not understand its nature according to scripture. Also, you do not understand the history of Azusa Street and its voodoo origins.
Some racists may have thought black Christians were into voodoo. A pre-civil rights movement cessationist argued that Negros were easily excitable. There was a revival among slaves during the Second Great Awakening. God was able to slave blacks just as well as he was able to save whites. Being a black Christian doesn't make you a voodoo practicioner. Prior to Azusa Street, Seymour was involved in a Holiness group that was known as the evening light saints, which now goes by 'Church of God', the Holiness denomination out of Indiana, not the Pentecostal denomination out of Cleveland, Tennessee. The

I was looking at the Apostolic Faith newsletter last night from back then, and there are testimonies of people understanding different languages spoken 'in tongues' at Azusa. According to an eye witness, that was what drew the crowds.
 
Jan 17, 2020
4,792
736
113
Here's the guy Bobby Burdette .. I went to a tent revival he brought to our town .. People were getting healed and all kinds of things .. One night he had mentioned God had told him he would have a ministry in Haiti .. He also said that God told him there was 4 people there who was supposed to donate 100 dollars each .. The plate had already been passed and I had already give .. Three people had come up and give 100 dollars , he said there's 1 more and he waited .. I sat there and thought ''here we go'' then I thought I'm not going to sit here and let him beg, I'll give a hundred .. Then I stood up to go forward and he looked me in the eye and pointed at me and said ''it's not you, sit down'' then a minute later another person got up and come forward .. This guy refused my hundred dollars ..
Later when I found his ministry in Haiti he had finally started I became a supporter until I retired a couple years ago .. I supported many ministries local, national, and international .. So eat dust serpent
Sounds like a lucrative business more than anything else. And nothing like scripture mentions.
 
Jan 17, 2020
4,792
736
113
Some racists may have thought black Christians were into voodoo. A pre-civil rights movement cessationist argued that Negros were easily excitable. There was a revival among slaves during the Second Great Awakening. God was able to slave blacks just as well as he was able to save whites. Being a black Christian doesn't make you a voodoo practicioner. Prior to Azusa Street, Seymour was involved in a Holiness group that was known as the evening light saints, which now goes by 'Church of God', the Holiness denomination out of Indiana, not the Pentecostal denomination out of Cleveland, Tennessee. The

I was looking at the Apostolic Faith newsletter last night from back then, and there are testimonies of people understanding different languages spoken 'in tongues' at Azusa. According to an eye witness, that was what drew the crowds.
This is history, not racism. Voodoo uses tongues too but it is not first-century tongues found in the bible. https://www.dana.org/article/speaking-in-tongues-glossolalia-and-stress-reduction/
 

bojack

Well-known member
Dec 16, 2019
2,309
1,006
113
Sounds like a lucrative business more than anything else. And nothing like scripture mentions.
Of course it does to you with all you've got going ..
 
Jan 17, 2020
4,792
736
113
Of course it does to you with all you've got going ..
If you stick with scripture alone and reject anything not having direct quotes to enforce it, many of today's popular teaching falls by the wayside. Test it and see for yourself.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,163
1,792
113
If you stick with scripture alone and reject anything not having direct quotes to enforce it, many of today's popular teaching falls by the wayside. Test it and see for yourself.
Your assertions on this topic do not line up with scripture and you are always taking the argument away from scripture.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,163
1,792
113