JOHN MACARTHUR ABOUT ASSURANCE

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Nov 16, 2019
3,441
860
113
#62
So when will you see Christ's perfection in your behavior?
I see it now.
I see myself responding in the perfection of Christ in many situations.
Don't you?

Of course, I will be totally perfect when I leave this body.
Just as you will be. :)
 
Sep 14, 2019
1,336
50
48
#63
The Law is 100% truth and it's job is to convict / convince people of their sinful state.. The Law is Good.. But a mans attempts at doing the Law will NEVER be 100% perfect.. For all people fall short of the standards of God.. Thus we need to have all the times we fail to do the Law justly forgiven.. And the Gospel Way of salvation provides that Way through which all sinners need to be saved..

We are saved 100% by the grace of God and not by our performance in Law doing..

So i place my faith (trust ) 100% on the Atonement of Jesus for my Salvation..

I believe that the Law is good and that it reveals to me and everyone else who is honest, their desperate need for the Atonement of Jesus to be saved.. So i have absolutely Zero% faith ( trust ) that my attempts at law doing shall see me saved.. Believing the law is good and truth does NOT mean i believe that the Way to be saved is by doing the Law..
The purpose of law is to lead to faith in atonement. But even after coming to faith you are yet under the law.
You haven't yet died to the law (Romans 7:4).
 
Sep 14, 2019
1,336
50
48
#65
I see it now.
I see myself responding in the perfection of Christ in many situations.
Don't you?

Of course, I will be totally perfect when I leave this body.
Just as you will be. :)
Your assumption that forsaking sinning covers sin shows your denial in the atonement work of Christ. You trust in your works not the atonement to cover sin.
 

Adstar

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2016
7,554
3,583
113
#66
The purpose of law is to lead to faith in atonement. But even after coming to faith you are yet under the law.
You haven't yet died to the law (Romans 7:4).
To be under the Law is to be subject to the penalty of transgressing the Law.. and the price of sin is death...

So while the Law is good and serves it's purpose and we should strive to follow it. We are not under the Law but under Grace..

Romans 6: KJV
14 "For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace."
 
Sep 14, 2019
1,336
50
48
#67
To be under the Law is to be subject to the penalty of transgressing the Law.. and the price of sin is death...

So while the Law is good and serves it's purpose and we should strive to follow it. We are not under the Law but under Grace..

Romans 6: KJV
14 "For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace."
Don't you want to penalise a couple who have acknowledged the law & now believe in His grace?
So you are yet under the law!
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,058
13,749
113
#68
So what is the issue?
Why would you trust a person who cannot be consistent in what he believes? Additionally there are issues with MacArthur's wealth.
 
K

Kim82

Guest
#69
Does faith in His steadfast love mean abuse?
This is one of those threads where it does not matter what you answer, it will not be the right answer because unless I tell you what you want to hear...

Instead of asking questions, just tell us what you believe in. Some will agree, some won't.
 
Sep 14, 2019
1,336
50
48
#70
Truth is objective. You seem to deny faith.
 
Sep 14, 2019
1,336
50
48
#71
That is not the issue. The issue is that MacArthur is not consistent in his theology. Calvinists are Amillennialists. Also Dispensationalists who hold to the pre-trib Rapture reject Five Point Calvinism.
Simply because dispensationalists who hold to the pre-trib Rapture reject Five Point Calvinism, doesn't mean Calvinists cannot consistently hold on to premillennialism.
 

Adstar

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2016
7,554
3,583
113
#72
Don't you want to penalise a couple who have acknowledged the law & now believe in His grace?
So you are yet under the law!
I want to give warning... It is God who shall judge and it is He who will impose the ultimate penalty where applicable.. His will be done...

You are too focused on defending their actions and laying false allegations upon people who bring forth their concerns about the situation..
 

KhedetOrthos

Active member
Dec 13, 2019
284
158
43
#73
According to John MacArthur & Phil Johnson...
1) what should a christian do if he sins?
2) What is the meaning of repentance?
3) How to gain assurance of salvation?
4) Can a person be saved but lose assurance?

I would like to know the above.
“Listen then to what the parable of the sower means: 19 When anyone hears the message about the kingdom and does not understand it, the evil one comes and snatches away what was sown in their heart. This is the seed sown along the path. 20 The seed falling on rocky ground refers to someone who hears the word and at once receives it with joy. 21 But since they have no root, they last only a short time. When trouble or persecution comes because of the word, they quickly fall away. 22 The seed falling among the thorns refers to someone who hears the word, but the worries of this life and the deceitfulness of wealth choke the word, making it unfruitful. 23 But the seed falling on good soil refers to someone who hears the word and understands it. This is the one who produces a crop, yielding a hundred, sixty or thirty times what was sown.”

Matthew 13. With Jesus himself saying that you can fall away from the faith and lose your salvation, there really is no room for the concept of eternal security.
 
Sep 14, 2019
1,336
50
48
#74
I want to give warning... It is God who shall judge and it is He who will impose the ultimate penalty where applicable.. His will be done...

You are too focused on defending their actions and laying false allegations upon people who bring forth their concerns about the situation..
Why would God judge those who have admitted they are guilty before the moral law and sought His grace? If He would yet judge what is the meaning of admitting guilt & seeking grace?

Judgement as you pointed out is for those who deny they moral law or deny they aren't guilty and/or refuse to seek grace through Christ's blood.

You are differentiating from an act and sin. An act becomes sinful if not covered by His grace.

These were the points they put forth.

What concerns are you focussing on?
 
Sep 14, 2019
1,336
50
48
#75
“Listen then to what the parable of the sower means: 19 When anyone hears the message about the kingdom and does not understand it, the evil one comes and snatches away what was sown in their heart. This is the seed sown along the path. 20 The seed falling on rocky ground refers to someone who hears the word and at once receives it with joy. 21 But since they have no root, they last only a short time. When trouble or persecution comes because of the word, they quickly fall away. 22 The seed falling among the thorns refers to someone who hears the word, but the worries of this life and the deceitfulness of wealth choke the word, making it unfruitful. 23 But the seed falling on good soil refers to someone who hears the word and understands it. This is the one who produces a crop, yielding a hundred, sixty or thirty times what was sown.”

Matthew 13. With Jesus himself saying that you can fall away from the faith and lose your salvation, there really is no room for the concept of eternal security.
So you have no assurance of salvation?
 

Adstar

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2016
7,554
3,583
113
#76
Why would God judge those who have admitted they are guilty before the moral law and sought His grace? If He would yet judge what is the meaning of admitting guilt & seeking grace?
We are going around in circles.. If a person agrees with God that engaging in sexual relationship outside of marriage is wrong then they will at lest make an effort to avoid engaging in such sinful activity in the future.. By your description of what is happening they are making no effort to bring to an end their sinning.. This is demonstrating to the congregation that they are not genuine in their repentance.. It's not hard to get married.. And it takes a day for one of them to move out of shared accommodation..

Judgement as you pointed out is for those who deny they moral law or deny they aren't guilty and/or refuse to seek grace through Christ's blood.
True.. But these two are by their refusal to either marry or separate demonstrating that they are only giving lip service to the moral law..

You are differentiating from an act and sin. An act becomes sinful if not covered by His grace.
Murder is sin and remains sin irrespective if it is covered by grace or not.. The covering of the Blood of Jesus does not make sin no longer sin.. It covers the sin and pays the penalty for that sin..
 
Sep 14, 2019
1,336
50
48
#77
We are going around in circles.. If a person agrees with God that engaging in sexual relationship outside of marriage is wrong then they will at lest make an effort to avoid engaging in such sinful activity in the future.. By your description of what is happening they are making no effort to bring to an end their sinning.. This is demonstrating to the congregation that they are not genuine in their repentance.. It's not hard to get married.. And it takes a day for one of them to move out of shared accommodation..



True.. But these two are by their refusal to either marry or separate demonstrating that they are only giving lip service to the moral law..



Murder is sin and remains sin irrespective if it is covered by grace or not.. The covering of the Blood of Jesus does not make sin no longer sin.. It covers the sin and pays the penalty for that sin..
A (Adstar): If a person agrees with God that engaging in sexual relationship outside of marriage is wrong then they will at lest make an effort to avoid engaging in such sinful activity in the future
M (Me): They make no effort to avoid engaging in their live in relationship because they don't continue under law. It is the moral law which tells it is evil. Law has led them to grace.

A: By your description of what is happening they are making no effort to bring to an end their sinning.
M: If it is yet considered sinning, there is no meaning of grace covering & rendering sin unaccounted.

A: This is demonstrating to the congregation that they are not genuine in their repentance.
M: Under law, repentance is to turn from doing evil to doing good. But under grace, repentance is turning from trusting in the law to be justified to trusting in His atonement to be justified.

A: It's not hard to get married. And it takes a day for one of them to move out of shared accommodation.
M: The issue is not getting married, but doing so without understanding grace covers & renders sin unaccounted is a false repentance. It a self-deception to think our repentance & plans/efforts to live holy makes us special in comparison to the live-in couple & enables us to not need the same grace they need or need it lesser.

A: But these two are by their refusal to either marry or separate demonstrating that they are only giving lip service to the moral law.
M: True they are only giving lip service to the moral law, if they continue to remain under the moral law. Moral law has showed they can never be sinless & live before God and therefore led them to grace.

A: Murder is sin and remains sin irrespective if it is covered by grace or not.
M: Jael murdered Sisera & David/Joshua murdered thousands. How? They were covered by grace or else they would be in hell.

A: The covering of the Blood of Jesus does not make sin no longer sin.. It covers the sin and pays the penalty for that sin.
M: Atonement not only forgives & covers sin. You carefully avoided the "rendering sin unaccounted" work of His atonement of grace.
 

Adstar

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2016
7,554
3,583
113
#78
A (Adstar): If a person agrees with God that engaging in sexual relationship outside of marriage is wrong then they will at lest make an effort to avoid engaging in such sinful activity in the future
M (Me): They make no effort to avoid engaging in their live in relationship because they don't continue under law. It is the moral law which tells it is evil. Law has led them to grace.

A: By your description of what is happening they are making no effort to bring to an end their sinning.
M: If it is yet considered sinning, there is no meaning of grace covering & rendering sin unaccounted.

A: This is demonstrating to the congregation that they are not genuine in their repentance.
M: Under law, repentance is to turn from doing evil to doing good. But under grace, repentance is turning from trusting in the law to be justified to trusting in His atonement to be justified.

A: It's not hard to get married. And it takes a day for one of them to move out of shared accommodation.
M: The issue is not getting married, but doing so without understanding grace covers & renders sin unaccounted is a false repentance. It a self-deception to think our repentance & plans/efforts to live holy makes us special in comparison to the live-in couple & enables us to not need the same grace they need or need it lesser.

A: But these two are by their refusal to either marry or separate demonstrating that they are only giving lip service to the moral law.
M: True they are only giving lip service to the moral law, if they continue to remain under the moral law. Moral law has showed they can never be sinless & live before God and therefore led them to grace.

A: Murder is sin and remains sin irrespective if it is covered by grace or not.
M: Jael murdered Sisera & David/Joshua murdered thousands. How? They were covered by grace or else they would be in hell.

A: The covering of the Blood of Jesus does not make sin no longer sin.. It covers the sin and pays the penalty for that sin.
M: Atonement not only forgives & covers sin. You carefully avoided the "rendering sin unaccounted" work of His atonement of grace.
We do not belong to the same faith Sudakar.. You are simply repeating your religious beliefs,, So there is no longer any profit in this discussion..
 
Sep 14, 2019
1,336
50
48
#79
We do not belong to the same faith Sudakar.. You are simply repeating your religious beliefs,, So there is no longer any profit in this discussion..
I think your ideas belong to your traditions and which has no scriptural warrant nor logical consistency.
 

Adstar

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2016
7,554
3,583
113
#80
I think your ideas belong to your traditions and which has no scriptural warrant nor logical consistency.
And i believe your ideas belong to your desire to use the grace of Jesus as a license to sin..