I read carefully
In 70 ad, there was no ARMIES surrounding jerusalem. Titus was one armie. not multiple. he was one commander. the people who destroyed the temple was the army which was already there, they came from the fort antonia and destroyed the city.
it might help if you study history
also. ww1 and ww2 made what titus did to jerusalem look like a picnic, because it was NOT the greatest tribulation the world had ever seen. nor was all life threatened demanding Jesus return for the sake of the elect (he who endures to the end will be saved)
and prophesy, the ARMIEs (plural) from many nations, will surround Jerusalem in the future.
This goes all the way back to Daniel. To insert modern terms, the Amillennialists recognized the Kingdom had arrived as a spiritual Kingdom at the time of the Roman Empire. This according to the prophecy. The Pharisees, the Premilleenialist and Dispensationalists were spiritually blind and said it didn't arrive. So they either inserted a gap, changed Jesus into Antichrist, and moved it thousands of years into the future, and still counting. Or said the physical kingdom they expect is still future, adding another kingdom to scripture Jesus clearly denounced in his wranglings with the Pharisees.
Jesus says only the born again can see the kingdom. These do not, or they wouldn't be Premillennial or Dispensational.I don't know about that, but premillennialism is a defective teaching. We can't have death after Jesus returns. At the resurrection, death is defeated, and this occurs when he returns. Also, it's a fundamental problem with relation to the doctrine of union with Christ, claiming that Jews and Gentiles have separate destinies.
Jesus says only the born again can see the kingdom. These do not, or they wouldn't be Premillennial or Dispensational.
I think they and Dispensationalists are part of the great apostasy along with the Charismatic movement. But I fell into all three movements until years of study set me free.I'm not sure what you mean, but I wouldn't call premillennialists unsaved, only confused.
Severely confused.
Misled.
I was premillennialist up until the last 3 years or so.
https://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/the-millennium-is-a-pharisee-doctrine.189921/Can you provide any references from recognized authors which support this view that dispensationalism is a Pharisee doctrine, and explains their position?

Jewish Encyclopedia. By: Joseph Jacobs, A. Biram
Possibly, but I'm going mainly on the Ecumenical Creeds and opening studies based on their findings.Is there any conservative Christian author who promotes this view, though?
Joseph Jacobs was Jewish in his faith.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Jacobs
Perhaps you are just saying that Jews prior to Christ were already teaching the Millennium. If that is true, then it certainly would be an odd thing, and would be suspect.
I used to go to Riddlebarger and Michael Horton’s Church. Although I’m onboard with the Reformational view regarding soteriology and especially the Solas, I’m not when it comes to eschatology. Whether you know it or not, the early dispensationalists were from a Reformed perspective.would recommend the book, A Case for Amillennialism, by Kim Riddlebarger, for a good understanding on this topic.
Dispensationalists are not even aware that there are other options, for the most part.
Here's what you must believe as a dispensationalist:
You must necessarily believe that physical death will continue to exist beyond the time of Christ’s second coming
You must necessarily believe that the natural creation will continue, beyond the time of Christ’s second coming, to be subjected to the curse imposed by the fall of man.
You must necessarily believe that the New Heavens and New Earth will not be introduced until 1,000 years subsequent to the return of Christ.
You must necessarily believe that unbelieving men and women will still have the opportunity to come to saving faith in Christ for at least 1,000 years subsequent to his return.
You must necessarily believe that unbelievers will not be finally resurrected until at least 1,000 years subsequent to the return of Christ.
You must necessarily believe that unbelievers will not be finally judged and cast into eternal punishment until at least 1,000 years subsequent to the return of Christ.
Here's an article which addresses the problems with each of these claims, by an ex-dispensationalist, Sam Storms.
By the way, the problem is not only with dispensationalists, it is a problem with historical premillennialism.
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/...u-must-believe-if-you-are-a-premillennialist/
A completely false caricature as they get both, eternal life and their Land Back.