creationist debate?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Lightskin

Well-known member
Aug 16, 2019
3,165
3,665
113
#21
I’m talking 6 day creation, if that makes any difference...I have been led to believe that some ‘believers’ do not accept Genesis as the literal account.
Why do you put believers in quotes?
 

Pemican

Senior Member
Sep 27, 2014
959
246
43
#22
Evolution is the biggest fairy tale every told. Evolution is a religion because it is base on faith not evidence. They have spent over 100 years looking for evidence and found nothing of substance.
 

Pemican

Senior Member
Sep 27, 2014
959
246
43
#23
More and more scientists are changing sides to the intelligent design camp because the evidence is shouting this.
 

Didymous

Senior Member
Feb 22, 2018
5,047
2,101
113
#24
The only reason we have a 'theory' of evolution is because Charles Darwin was angry with God. :cool:
 
R

Reformyourself

Guest
#26
Why do you put believers in quotes?
Oh. It’s just because I struggle to accept that Christians believers who try to marry evil-ution with Creation, or accept any part of the theory. Although, I can accept that Christians could have been blinded by it, because of their education, as I was. So, They could be on a journey of faith, but hopefully would come to full faith by ‘studying’ creation for themselves.
 
R

Reformyourself

Guest
#27

Subhumanoidal

Well-known member
Sep 17, 2018
4,060
3,173
113
#28
Oh. It’s just because I struggle to accept that Christians believers who try to marry evil-ution with Creation, or accept any part of the theory. Although, I can accept that Christians could have been blinded by it, because of their education, as I was. So, They could be on a journey of faith, but hopefully would come to full faith by ‘studying’ creation for themselves.
I'm sorry to say this, but it seems you'll fit right in the BDF.
 
R

Reformyourself

Guest
#30
i just told you of another instance when the word 'yom' was used in Gen 2 to refer to the entire 6 day creation week.
in Genesis 2:4 yôm is part of an anarthrous (ref) prepositional compound beyômmeaning not ‘in the day’ but simply ’when’.
(Ref) i.e. lacking the definite article. If the definite article (represented by the vowel marking pathach under the beth) then it would signify ‘in the day’. Its lack signifies an idiomatic use meaning ‘when’ as in the NIV translation.
 
Jun 10, 2019
4,304
1,659
113
#34
Oh. It’s just because I struggle to accept that Christians believers who try to marry evil-ution with Creation, or accept any part of the theory. Although, I can accept that Christians could have been blinded by it, because of their education, as I was. So, They could be on a journey of faith, but hopefully would come to full faith by ‘studying’ creation for themselves.
What does the length of creation rather fast or slow have to do with evolution.

I ask because the length of time of creation really had nothing to do with evolution. yea I get they say millions of years but that is without supervision design by a concept of things just coming to be on its own.
 
R

Reformyourself

Guest
#37
bible discussion forum
What does the length of creation rather fast or slow have to do with evolution.

I ask because the length of time of creation really had nothing to do with evolution. yea I get they say millions of years but that is without supervision design by a concept of things just coming to be on its own.
Evolution has nothing to do with creation, but Some ‘believers’ insinuate that they believe everything in The Bible, except that I know they struggle with the literal 6 day Genesis account (as I did). People accept evolution, because it makes more sense (easier to believe). However, IF a believer rejects the creation account, they certainly could not accept the resurrection (though they will say they do). As I have already said, anybody can say they’re a believer.
 
Jun 10, 2019
4,304
1,659
113
#40
Isn’t nature a beauty
Evolution has nothing to do with creation, but Some ‘believers’ insinuate that they believe everything in The Bible, except that I know they struggle with the literal 6 day Genesis account (as I did). People accept evolution, because it makes more sense (easier to believe). However, IF a believer rejects the creation account, they certainly could not accept the resurrection (though they will say they do). As I have already said, anybody can say they’re a believer.
Again evolution has nothing to do with 6 literal days of time or a billion years of time, the difference in the two is by Who, length is valid regardless if you or I think God took 6 literal 24 hours each day or 1,444,000,000 years a day. Because with God anything is possible.