@timps I know we left off with evidence. It seems that a lot has happened in this thread since I last posted...this may not fit any more. This is just a base with how scripture interacts with this a bit. NOTE: Scripture itself (the words) not THE Word necessarily from my perspective as I am definitely willing to correct any error or have corrected my thinking if The Word corrects me. Some of that might not make sense, but other people are reading...I try to meet others halfway "if it's possible"...only through Christ is it possible but that's up to him of course. May, but I am open myself. I will also say that I've lost the "substance" of this conversation right now.
I intended to do a part 2 about human evidence and how that interacts with faith but I'm just not feeling it right now. I scanned the last page and I think
@Magenta said something along the lines that personal faith is not transferable...but it's like, what is evidentiary to me or "evidenced" (like self-evident) based off pattern recognition, apologetics, and personal feelings/experiences is pretty hard to explain fully but even if we had a conversation about it, still it might only end up being "that's what you believe" what it does do is can make someone hungry for something similar from the same source. That's kind of witnessing to me.
Anyway, overlong already, I put the basis for a train of thought after her quote...it's a rough draft of part of a post but there you go, I intended to finish it but it'll be a while, so if you stick around...
Not sure if that quote will work or not since it was a quote of a quote
Evidence hmm...that is a tough one. First I'll go according to scripture and then human experience and see if there is a connection.
Scripture:
I think someone posted the scripture about what the bible defines faith as...the "evidence" of things unseen.
Here is what the Strongs concordance defines the Greek word as (alas, the two definitions are contradictory without faith)
1650:
Elegchos: Proof, conviction - evidence, reproof
There are a few instances in the OT but that requires context and I take a lot more care with the Hebrew.
So. Proof, conviction. Apologies in advance if this is a bit scattered.
"
we hold these truths to be self-evident..." <---from the constitution. I think this is probably the type of evidence that is meant in the Greek rather than scientifically verifiable "proof". There are quite a few things that cannot be empirically verified (such as truth) and "evident" based off some type of data. It's possible that there is more to this interpretation of the word "evidence" but as a starting place perhaps that will do.
It may be helpful to define "data" also though. Data is information/input. Our likes/dislikes are data. There are so many factors and variables present in each human and the input varies so much that it's hard for me to speak to unless I have someone else's data to interact with.
We know that without faith it is impossible to please God and the Just shall live by faith. There are a good many verses which expand what faith is but according to itself and not exclusively. Meaning it is impossible to understand faith according to these verses if one treats it as "academic" and does not engage what it actually is as being more than just "intellectually contained". Not to get too wordy, but it is a construct that is temporal and yet like time in a way, human beings are bound by it.
Maybe some good questions are...we each have faith in something, why not faith in God?
If you don't know what is "real" or what is beyond death, how can you rule it out?
What if this legitimately is the system of the universe, that a being who is powerful enough to operate outside the fragile limited mortality of a human being and their conscious reality to be able to "not be proven" and that's just how it is and it is immutable.
If we operate from that position, then why not God?
Because of? : (fill in the blank may move us forward)
~the existence of evil?
~pain?
~not understanding?
~wanting your own will?
~stubbornness?
~confusion?
~not believing you are the "elect"?
It is clear that you are interested in understanding possibly...I can't judge your motives other than I was interested in responding to you specifically for whatever reason.