The Rapture Thief Robs Jesuit Futurism Of The 7 Years Of Tribulation

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Aug 3, 2019
3,744
507
113
Are you saying they got there alive?
No, I'm saying the text doesn't say the Antichrist murders anyone...it only says the Antichrist makes a death decree.

Also, it doesn't say those who "got the victory over the Antichrist" were killed. Getting the victory over the Antichrist doesn't necessarily mean dying. There were millions throughout the Dark Ages that were faithful to God and got the victory over the Papal Antichrist and lived to a ripe old age...Luther was one such person.
 
Aug 3, 2019
3,744
507
113
The gathering of the church and the Lord's return to the earth to end the age, are two separate events, with different purposes.
Yes, they are two separate events that happen ON THE SAME DAY :)

The day the Lord descends from the heavens gloriously and with the shout, voice, and trumpet...it is that THAT TIME that the dead in Christ are raptured followed by the "alive and remain" saints. There is no mention of any 7 years gap anywhere in this text.
Well, at least you are consistent in that you are batting a 100% with wrong interpretations! You are right, I will not get into a discussion about Antiochus being the little horn of Daniel, because he isn't.
Sigh...the reason you're in the tank with Jesuit Futurism is that it's the only theory you and your Jesuit Futurist friends talk about in your eschatological echo chamber. Protestant Historicism says the Little Horn is the PAPACY, not Antiochus the CHUMP.
The imposing horn mentioned in Dan.7, is that future antichrist/beast.
It is the Papacy, which arose in the PAST as the prophecy said it would.
Regarding him, it states that "He will speak out against the Most High
This same Antichrist is described in Revelation 13 as speaking "blasphemies". HELLO....the Bible says "blasphemy" is to claim to be God and to claim the power to forgive sin, which the Papacy has claimed for over 1,500 years.
and oppress the saints of the Most High for time, times and half a time
"time, times, and half a time" is "1,260 days" which are literal years, which the Papacy did persecute God's people from its inception in 538 to 1798 when it received the "deadly wound" from France -- anyone who understands history knows it was the sword of France with which the Papacy persecuted and it was the sword of France which killled it..."he that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity...he that killeth with the sword must be killed by the sword."
which is referring to the last 3 1/2 years of that seven year period,
No, it isn't. By the time the Papacy arises, the 70th Week had expired over 500 years before, when the 70 Weeks began in 457 B.C and expired in 34 A.D. when the Gospel went to the Gentiles.
which is also referred to in Rev.13:5-7, when the beast, that horn, is given authority to make war and conquer the great tribulation saints for 42 months, which is also referring to that last 3 1/2 years.
Yes, the same time of Antichrist, from 538 to 1798, is here again referred to in Revelation. Did you ever notice that "time, times, and half a time" is the same as "42 months" is the same as "1,260 Days" is the same as "3 1/2 Years"??? It's the same time period.
You need unlearn what you have learned from this false teaching, which I have heard and contended against many other times. This is a known false teaching. And by these teachings, you are continuing to spread the lies.
No, you need to stick your head out of that Jesuit Futurist echo chamber and examine your own ideas CRITICALLY in the light of Protestant Historicism, but you won't. I've shown you over and over that there is not a single other Numerically Specific Time Prophecy in all the Bible that inserts "gaps" yet you insist on following Jesuit Francisco Ribera and his idea to insert a "gap" between the 69th and 70th Week, though you've been shown a perfectly plausible and acceptable competing theory that relies on no such Biblical fabrications. But, resist no further, brother :) www.historicist.com
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
It absolutely can apply, if we just don't subjectively demand that "escape" must involve "evasive maneuvers", right or wrong? When an employee "escapes" a round of budget layoffs, does anyone have to drag him out of the way of anything? Likewise, those who pray will "escape" the coming time of trouble which will befall wicked:

"A thousand shall fall at thy side and ten thousand at thy right hand, but it shall not come nigh thee.
Only with thine eyes shalt thou behold and see
the reward of the wicked."​
Amazingly with the apostles ps 91 was missing at martyrdom.
Same during the gt. The ac is given power to overcome the saints.
No ps 91 during the gt
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
No, I'm saying the text doesn't say the Antichrist murders anyone...it only says the Antichrist makes a death decree.

Also, it doesn't say those who "got the victory over the Antichrist" were killed. Getting the victory over the Antichrist doesn't necessarily mean dying. There were millions throughout the Dark Ages that were faithful to God and got the victory over the Papal Antichrist and lived to a ripe old age...Luther was one such person.
You refuse the mark you die.

All that about surviving to the end is made up.
The ac kills all refusing the mark.

Rev 20
: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
Worship the beast or die.

There is no christians on the planet during the gt....after the ac gets done with them.

It is amazing thinking Christians get a pass.
Not even the apostles did.
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
""The day the Lord descends from the heavens gloriously and with the shout, voice, and trumpet...it is that THAT TIME that the dead in Christ are raptured followed by the "alive and remain" saints. There is no mention of any 7 years gap anywhere in this text.""

What changes those assumptions is the bride/groom dynamic.

Jesus gathers his bride ....that is the rapture.

See,that is the thing.
The first miracle is at a wedding and is eternally canonized as the first.

Jesus harvesting and returning for saints is peacetime.

Your model needs a wartime/destroyed planet setting.

No such thing.

We see the wartime at the second coming...not the rapture.
 

PlainWord

Senior Member
Jun 11, 2013
7,080
151
63
Worship the beast or die.

There is no christians on the planet during the gt....after the ac gets done with them.

It is amazing thinking Christians get a pass.
Not even the apostles did.
There are no Christians left in Jerusalem after it was surrounded by Titus.
 
Aug 3, 2019
3,744
507
113
Where does it say that the Beast was going to receive a deadly wound after it ruled for a "time, times, and half a time?" Are you combining Dan 7 with Rev 13? Why are you taking 1,260 days the time of the 2 witnesses and the time the Woman was protected and equating them with the ruling of the beast.

As I explained before the Beast with the 7 heads, one which received a mortal wound, was the Roman Empire and it's first 7 Caesars. Nero received the mortal wound without naming a successor thus Rome entered a brutal and bloody civil war during the year of the 4 emperors. At the height of it's strength, the beast appeared dead. Under Vespasian, the 7th head, the empire was restored. This idea of turning days into years here is not supported.
Revelation 13 says the Beast will reign 42 months.

Imagine that! The characteristics of the Beast are the SAME characteristics of the Little Horn, even down to the same period of time it will reign! The Little Horn was to reign for "a time, times, and half a time" which Revelation 12 says is "1,260 Days" and the Beast is to reign "42 months" which is.......drum roll please.........."1,260 days"!
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
QUOTE;""No, I'm saying the text doesn't say the Antichrist murders anyone...it only says the Antichrist makes a death decree.""

I showed the opposite of your statement in rev towards the last few chapters.

The innumerable number before the throne are billions in heaven during the gt.

If they are not martyrs then you made a excellent case for a pretrib rapture
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,835
4,321
113
mywebsite.us
The innumerable number before the throne are billions in heaven during the gt.
The statement in the verse implies an all-inclusive group; therefore, it would have to represent a moment in time at some point after the GT.
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,835
4,321
113
mywebsite.us
At the Rapture it is not "the harvest of the earth" that is reaped but the "harvest of the Church" that is summoned up by the lat trump, or the trump of God.
This is just playing with semantics.

In your estimation, who-all-exactly is included in 'the harvest of the earth' - harvested by Jesus Himself - right before everyone else is thrown into the 'Wrath of God'?
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,835
4,321
113
mywebsite.us
Are you placing Ignatius of Antioch in that category Gary?
Absolutely! He is at the top of the list. I can't think of anyone in that category that I trust less. (Not at the moment, anyway.)

He was martyred for his faith under Trajan.
Yet - saved or not - the influence of Catholicism on his writings was great. Just like many Catholics today who are thoroughly "ingrained" with the teachings of Catholicism.

His statement that the Lord came and raised the disciples is constant { consistent? } with Christ's own words and the expectation that all the disciples held that the Lord would return to their generation on the last day of their age, just before the war with Rome.
Christ's own words? Show me scripture.
expectation? Show me scripture.
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,835
4,321
113
mywebsite.us
Your model has the dead rising after the living are harvested during the gt in rev 14.
That second group in Revelation 14:19 are also living.

If there are any "dead rising" at that time, it is because God wants [some] people from the past to actually experience the Wrath of God 'firsthand-and-personal'.

Note that the first group was 'reaped' while the second group was 'gathered'.
 

PlainWord

Senior Member
Jun 11, 2013
7,080
151
63
Absolutely! He is at the top of the list. I can't think of anyone in that category that I trust less. (Not at the moment, anyway.)


Yet - saved or not - the influence of Catholicism on his writings was great. Just like many Catholics today who are thoroughly "ingrained" with the teachings of Catholicism.


Christ's own words? Show me scripture.
expectation? Show me scripture.
Hey Gary,

Ignatius of Antioch was a disciple of John the Apostle and a close friend of Polycarp. He wasn't "Catholic" in the way we think of Catholics throughout history. While the Catholic Church claims to have been founded by Peter and they trace their roots back to the time of Christ, Peter would not recognize the Church today. Ignatius was born in Syria around 40 AD and died in 108 AD, so he would be among the strongest links to the first century and to the disciples of Christ. If you read his writings, what doctrinal disagreements would you have with him, other than his claim that Christ returned and raised the disciples? Thus, he wasn't influenced by Catholicism at all since Catholicism as an institution didn't exist at that time.

Yes, consistent. Lots of typos as I approach 60:):).

Christ's own words? Sure, lots of examples.

Mat 10:23 When they persecute you in this city, flee to another. For assuredly, I say to you, you will not have gone through the cities of Israel before the Son of Man comes.

Since we know the cities of Israel were destroyed between 67-70 AD, He had to have returned.

Mat 16:28 Assuredly, I say to you, there are some standing here who shall not taste death till they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.”

Unless there are 2,000 year old monks living in Tibet, He had to have returned.

Mat 24:34 Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will by no means pass away till all these things take place.

He is saying that everything He discussed will take place before His generation passes away. Included in this was His return.

John 22:22 Jesus said to him, “If I will that he remain till I come, what is that to you? You follow Me.”

Here Jesus strongly suggests that John would still be alive when He returns while Peter would be dead. My view would make this an accurate statement.

Rev 1:7 Behold, He is coming with clouds, and every eye will see Him, even they who pierced Him. And all the tribes of the earth will mourn because of Him. Even so, Amen.

For this statement to be true there would have to be some Roman solders and or Jewish religious types responsible for the piercing to still be alive and the tribes of Israel must have seen it.

2 Thes 1:6 since it is a righteous thing with God to repay with [c]tribulation those who trouble you, 7 and to give you who are troubled rest with us when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with His mighty angels, 8 in flaming fire taking vengeance on those who do not know God...

For the persecuted Thessalonians to get rest before they died and for vengeance to be taken on those responsible, this had to happen in the first century because these Thessalonians are long gone.

1 Thes 1:and how you turned to God from idols to serve the living and true God, 10 and to wait for His Son from heaven, whom He raised from the dead, even Jesus who delivers us from the wrath to come.

Same thing. They were told to wait for His Son, they were delivered from the wrath which came.

Who was told to watch? These are all first century people given this instruction. Only one generation would need to watch, not all generations!!

Mat 24:42 Watch therefore, for you do not know what hour your Lord is coming.

Mat 25:“Watch therefore, for you know neither the day nor the hour in which the Son of Man is coming.

Mark 13:37 And what I say to you, I say to all: Watch!”

Luk 21:36 Watch therefore, and pray always that you may be counted worthy to escape all these things that will come to pass, and to stand before the Son of Man.”

1 Cor 16:13 Watch, stand fast in the faith, be brave, be strong...

Eph 6:18 praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, being watchful to this end with all perseverance and supplication for all the saints—

1 Thes 5:6 Therefore let us not sleep, as others do, but let us watch and be sober.

2 Tim 4:5 But you be watchful in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry.

1 Pet 4:7 But the end of all things is at hand; therefore be serious and watchful in your prayers.

Rev 3:2-3 Be watchful, and strengthen the things which remain, that are ready to die, for I have not found your works perfect before God. Remember therefore how you have received and heard; hold fast and repent. Therefore if you will not watch, I will come upon you as a thief, and you will not know what hour I will come upon you.

If His return was to be thousands of years into their future, there would be no urgent need to watch. Any objective person reading these passages would expect Christ to return in fairly short order. Again, the disciples all thought it and with good reason as Christ promised it. Those ECF that you despise, none of them spoke of Christ's soon return. They didn't instruct anyone to watch out for it.

Gary, perhaps you could consider what the nature of Christ's return would be and consider why they had to watch, otherwise they might miss it like those 5 virgins.
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
The statement in the verse implies an all-inclusive group; therefore, it would have to represent a moment in time at some point after the GT.
Nope.
It STATES the opposite.

Not only that the saints are not in heaven after the gt. ALL ARE GONE. read rev 19.
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
That second group in Revelation 14:19 are also living.

If there are any "dead rising" at that time, it is because God wants [some] people from the past to actually experience the Wrath of God 'firsthand-and-personal'.

Note that the first group was 'reaped' while the second group was 'gathered'.
3 groups. 3 harvests.

144k are described as in heaven in rev 14 (either raptured or martyred)
Then ripe fruit taken by Jesus on a cloud.
Then rotten fruit gathered to be slain in armageddon.

3 separate harvests.

The last one to wrath.

Note they are fruit, not grain.

Note the the first miracle of Jesus was also fruit centered and he was told "...you saved the best for last"....Referring to rev 14 jewish harvest.
The 144k are FIRSTFRUIT.
Main harvest follows firstfruit.

Only pretrib rapture doctrine unpacks the purposes.
No other position touches purpose.
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
It absolutely can apply, if we just don't subjectively demand that "escape" must involve "evasive maneuvers", right or wrong? When an employee "escapes" a round of budget layoffs, does anyone have to drag him out of the way of anything? Likewise, those who pray will "escape" the coming time of trouble which will befall wicked:

"A thousand shall fall at thy side and ten thousand at thy right hand, but it shall not come nigh thee.
Only with thine eyes shalt thou behold and see
the reward of the wicked."​
Nope

It says specifically escape to another location.

".....escape the things about to come upon the earth and stand b4 the son of God"
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
Let this sink in --- Revelation 14:16 is talking about the Rapture and Revelation 14:19 is talking about everyone else (who is left after the Rapture) being "thrown into" the 'Wrath of God'.
Factor in 1 thes 4.

The dead proceed the living
 

PlainWord

Senior Member
Jun 11, 2013
7,080
151
63
That second group in Revelation 14:19 are also living.

If there are any "dead rising" at that time, it is because God wants [some] people from the past to actually experience the Wrath of God 'firsthand-and-personal'.

Note that the first group was 'reaped' while the second group was 'gathered'.
Gary,

May I suggest that it is impossible to understand Rev 14:14-20 without recognizing what its companion passage (Mat 13) tells us? "The harvest is the end of the age, and the reapers are the angels." Obviously there are two groups of people being discussed in both passages, the wheat and tares of Mat 13. Here the tares are gathered and burned up while the wheat is gathered into His barn. We are then told, "The righteous will shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father." This statement should sound familiar as it is the same message found in Dan 12: 2 "And many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, Some to everlasting life, Some to shame and everlasting contempt. 3 Those who are wise shall shine Like the brightness of the firmament..." Both passages describe the brightness of the good. We are as bright lights in the spiritual realm.

It is critical to understand that at all times in Revelation "earth" is symbolic of Israel. Wheat is harvested with a sickle as found in Rev 14:15. The wheat harvest begins in Sivan around the time of Pentecost. Josephus claims that just before the war during the feast of Pentecost "they felt a quaking, and heard a great noise, and after that they heard a sound as of a great multitude, saying, "Let us remove hence." The voice of God is often described in the OT as the sound of a great multitude accompanied by an earthquake so we know the presence of God/Christ was there. Thus the righteous of Israel is being harvested at the end of the Jewish age. Thus Rev 14:14-16 is discussing the resurrection of the just that occurred at the end of the Mosaic or Jewish age.

As for the second group, the tares. I agree they are living, at least as the passage begins. Here in Rev 14 they are referred to as grapes. In Revelation 14:18 sickles are used by the angels to cut grape clusters from the vine. The Roman offensive under Cestius began at the start of the grape harvest in 66 AD. These grapes are thrown into the great wine press of the wrath of God. Here the destruction of Israel prior to the siege of Jerusalem is pictured as the crushing of grapes during the grape harvest. This symbolism is not without precedence: In this verse, as in Isaiah 5:7, Israel is symbolized as a vineyard; and as is the case in Lamentations 1:15, the slaughter of the Israelites is represented as grapes being crushed in a winepress. This imagery is also clearly presented in Isaiah 63:1-3.

In v. 20 we see the winepress was trampled outside the city, and blood came out of the winepress, up to the horses’ bridles, for one thousand six hundred strata. 1,600 stadia is the exact length of the Jordan River and as such is an estimate of the length of Israel “from one end to another.” Interestingly, Josephus also uses similar language to Ezekiel 32:6 and 2 Kings 21:16 in recording the fulfillment of Revelation 14:20: “Galilee was all over filled with fire and blood.” And along these same lines concerning the excessively bloody aftermath of the Jewish War, the Talmud records the following claim: “For seven years did the nations of the world cultivate their vineyards with no other manure than the blood of Israel.”

Though the image of blood rising as high as a horse’s bridle is meant to symbolize Jesus “treading the winepress” on His white horse during the second coming as He comes in judgment on Israel, v. 20 appears to have been fulfilled in a surprisingly literal way during the Jewish War. These verses seem to have been fulfilled when thousands of fugitives from Gadara were cornered by the Roman army at the Jordan River. Extending a long way along the Jordan, the men of Gadara could not cross the river as a result of a strong current from recent rainfall. There along the Jordan, the men of Gadara “sustained the darts that were thrown at them as well as the attacks of the horsemen who beat many of them, and pushed them into the current.” The imagery of the blood reaching to the horses’ bridles is also a picture of the Roman horsemen treading through the Jordan while bloodying the water of the river with the victims of Gadara.

These verses are strikingly similar to the second coming as it is described in Revelation 19:11-15. In these verses Jesus again strides on horseback with garments stained red with blood. His garments are red because He “treads the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty” in Revelation 19:15 as He had also done in Isaiah 63:3. He does this alone according to Isaiah 63:3 which explains why only Jesus’ garments are stained red in Revelation 19:13-14. The fact that blood reaches His horses’ bridle in Revelation 14:20 explains how Jesus’ garments had become stained red with blood in Revelation 19:13 while He sat atop his white horse. Therefore, far from depicting a literal flood of blood over Israel in the first century, Revelation 14:20 ultimately portrays Jesus coming in judgment on Israel as He rides on His white horse shedding blood up to His horse’s bridle as He “treads the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty.” Remember that 1,600 stadia is the exact length of the Jordan River and as such is an estimate of the length of Israel “from one end to another.”