BLM does not make sense

[MattforJesus]

There could be a method to the elected Democrats and their hired domestic terrorists madness.

Think about it. If the domestic terrorists currently terrorizing parts of America unabated by law enforcement or elected officials in those areas continue to wreak havoc and pose a threat to life and property, the worse it is allowed to get the more people suffering the terror will call for action from, who else, government officials.

Chaos and terrorism in the public domain is cause for government to step in and offer to quell the problem with? More laws! Restrictions on liberty and freedoms because we were not responsible when having those in full before, which is why the chaos and domestic terrorism broke out, so in order to restore order we are told we have to surrender a few of our rights and freedoms. (Recall how that transpired right after 9-11 and when the U.S. Patriot act was passed into law and made news. And don't forget the National Defense Authorization Act, (NDAA) first signed into law by BHO and signed again into law by President Trump. (S. 1790) This law among other things allows for indefinite detention! All under the auspices of combating terrorism on American soil.
But, "terrorism" is a relative term. Remember the people that were reported missing shortly after 9-11? Turned out they were arrested as terror suspects and were being held in many cases in our state prisons. Without trial, without access to a phone to make their one call to family or an attorney, and without being arraigned.

Does it make sense that elected officials, mayors, governors, would stand idle and permit domestic terrorism in the streets of the cities and states they oversee? Democratic or blue state cities.

Or could these failures in leadership actually be following orders from the Democrats on Capitol Hill and the deep pockets who buy them?
Members of Congress make less than $200,000 per Annum. (per year). How is it then that every long serving member of Congress is a millionaire?

What if all that is transpiring now and is allowed to continue is based on the expectation by the Left in D.C. that their party will sweep November? And as such, will then sweep in and execute law and order where the domestic terrorists have been let to act with impunity. And as such what is maybe even officially declared, Authoritarianism, will enter in as the rule of law literally for all of America. Due to the lawlessness that occurred unabated these many months and in unabated. And also, during the Coronavirus lock down.

While, if Trump wins, please God let him win and the GOP take majority in both houses of Congress, the lawlessness stops because those domestic terrorists are then arrested. And those elected officials that allowed it to continue are too. Because the Republican party doesn't have to worry about image so as to gain votes any more.

Donald Trump will win the election and many people are leaving the Democrat party, Black Americans are realizing that the Democratic party is no good, and many people are not against BLM, and many people running them out of their neighborhoods, and many comments on youtube that they have had enough and they are going to wake up the silent majority.

Many people do not know about United Nations Agenda 21, 1992, 179 nations agreed to it, sustainability development, ecology, economy, social, ban the police, communities work in their communities to fight crime, put everyone equal economically, and social status wise.

Ecology- balance between nature and people to take all people out of the rural areas, and place them in the cities, and no development can happen outside city limits, no police force, communities work to fight crime by all participating watching the street and watching their neighbor, and the streets monitored 24 hours a day surveillance by technology.

Economy- all people equal economically, and only go by their needs, and not their wants, and limited resources.

Social- all people equal social status wise. Remove all public display of prejudice.

Government structure- global government, regional, neighborhood.

This is what United Nations wants, and want the nations to be compatible with Agenda 21 for a global government that is a balance between communism and democracy.

Target date for a global government, 2030. The European people know about this more than Americans, and it is out in the open more with them.

So it appears as if the Democrat party is pushing Agenda 21 through BLM.

The big cities are being payed to regionalize their cities.

 

[soggykitten]

Donald Trump will win the election and many people are leaving the Democrat party, Black Americans are realizing that the Democratic party is no good, and many people are not against BLM, and many people running them out of their neighborhoods, and many comments on youtube that they have had enough and they are going to wake up the silent majority.

Many people do not know about United Nations Agenda 21, 1992, 179 nations agreed to it, sustainability development, ecology, economy, social, ban the police, communities work in their communities to fight crime, put everyone equal economically, and social status wise.

Ecology- balance between nature and people to take all people out of the rural areas, and place them in the cities, and no development can happen outside city limits, no police force, communities work to fight crime by all participating watching the street and watching their neighbor, and the streets monitored 24 hours a day surveillance by technology.

Economy- all people equal economically, and only go by their needs, and not their wants, and limited resources.

Social- all people equal social status wise. Remove all public display of prejudice.

Government structure- global government, regional, neighborhood.

This is what United Nations wants, and want the nations to be compatible with Agenda 21 for a global government that is a balance between communism and democracy.

Target date for a global government, 2030. The European people know about this more than Americans, and it is out in the open more with them.

So it appears as if the Democrat party is pushing Agenda 21 through BLM.

The big cities are being payed to regionalize their cities.

And it is to jump off at least of now, in 2030. People think it's fiction but this Agenda 21 is a United Nations project delineated in over 2000 pages. https://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/wssd/summarypublication.pdf

When your enemy puts in writing their plans for your global future, believe them!

And this just because this is RZ's last warning to us in this format. God rest you to peace sir. And bless you.

 

[soggykitten]

United Nations Agenda 21

 

[Nehemiah6]

But it is an agenda and their boldness must be because many are intentionally causing division so they push a marxist agenda, which the founders are marxist.

And the one standing behind this destructive and anarchistic Marxist agenda is Satan himself. Satan has been working on destroying America with its freedoms since at least 2008. But the ones who should have stood up to lawlessness became cowardly, and allowed the lawlessness to proceed without serious consequences. Now the Democrats are the party of lawlessness.

 

[MattforJesus]

United Nations Agenda 21

This woman tells about Agenda 21 well.

 

[soggykitten]

This woman tells about Agenda 21 well.

Yes, I saw her video in the side bar at YT. Thanks for adding it here.

 

[soggykitten]

This woman tells about Agenda 21 well.

Just to add due to reading certain discussions here and maybe as a forewarning, which has nothing to do with the information in this video. Rosa Koire is a Liberal and a Feminist. I read someone here once who had some very harsh words for Feminists. Rosa Koire is also Transgender. You can do a lot to hide your sex but you can never disguise the square hands that are typical of males. Therein, Rosa Koire cannot really be a Feminist. Maybe a Himinist.

 

[soggykitten]

I had heard of Agenda 21 last year. But, the two people, sources, I heard speaking about it were lets just say not really credible. Believing also in such silly stuff as the Ashtar Command, the Arcturians, and the like. I didn't think to give their Agenda 21 information a lot of my time. They failed to mention it was a United Nations invention.
This may be helpful though we may wish to open a discussion on Agenda 21 just so as to not derail this further?

Agenda 21 treaty on the horizon By Henry Lamb
March 24, 2012
https://canadafreepress.com/article/agenda-21-treaty-on-the-horizon

 

[MattforJesus]

I had heard of Agenda 21 last year. But, the two people, sources, I heard speaking about it were lets just say not really credible. Believing also in such silly stuff as the Ashtar Command, the Arcturians, and the like. I didn't think to give their Agenda 21 information a lot of my time. They failed to mention it was a United Nations invention.
This may be helpful though we may wish to open a discussion on Agenda 21 just so as to not derail this further?

Agenda 21 treaty on the horizon By Henry Lamb
March 24, 2012
https://canadafreepress.com/article/agenda-21-treaty-on-the-horizon

They are preparing the world for the coming world leader the New Age Christ, antichrist.

For this is a new age movement plan that interprets the Bible according to the occult, and evolution, and people are still evolving, and the man Jesus evolved to be an ascended master, and do not believe in a personal God.

The new age movement will pave the way to the beast kingdom in Revelation 13.

But they will say they have to come together for other reasons, and will not give people a heads up about the new age movement until the New Age Christ is working in the world pushing the agenda of the new age movement to prepare the world for when he claims to be God.

And they will not give people a heads up that the government will be more stricter as time goes on.

And they will not give them a heads up that the New Age Christ wants to get rid of a lot of people on earth, and by peace he shall destroy many.

 

[soggykitten]

They are preparing the world for the coming world leader the New Age Christ, antichrist.

For this is a new age movement plan that interprets the Bible according to the occult, and evolution, and people are still evolving, and the man Jesus evolved to be an ascended master, and do not believe in a personal God.

The new age movement will pave the way to the beast kingdom in Revelation 13.

But they will say they have to come together for other reasons, and will not give people a heads up about the new age movement until the New Age Christ is working in the world pushing the agenda of the new age movement to prepare the world for when he claims to be God.

And they will not give people a heads up that the government will be more stricter as time goes on.

And they will not give them a heads up that the New Age Christ wants to get rid of a lot of people on earth, and by peace he shall destroy many.

One thing I noticed in researching the Agenda 21 entries I found was a very important description of the A21 itself. Agenda 21 is a non-binding action plan of the United Nations with regard to sustainable development.

I think if that part of the description had read, binding action plan, I'd be quite concerned. But as it stands, the A21 is a non-binding action plan.
A non-binding action plan means the A21 action plan stipulates the vested parties are not legally obligated to carry out its terms.
https://www.upcounsel.com/non-binding-contract

What if this whole reveal of A21 is a test to see how people respond and prepare? And during all these years people have known about it.

 

[MattforJesus]

One thing I noticed in researching the Agenda 21 entries I found was a very important description of the A21 itself. Agenda 21 is a non-binding action plan of the United Nations with regard to sustainable development.

I think if that part of the description had read, binding action plan, I'd be quite concerned. But as it stands, the A21 is a non-binding action plan.
A non-binding action plan means the A21 action plan stipulates the vested parties are not legally obligated to carry out its terms.
https://www.upcounsel.com/non-binding-contract

What if this whole reveal of A21 is a test to see how people respond and prepare? And during all these years people have known about it.

It is a non-binding plan, but they agreed to it so they think it is a good idea for sustainable development, but it must be they do not want it to be binding to have the pressure to be locked in to an agreement that would bind the nations together, which shows how many nations want to keep their sovereignty, and do not want a global government, although they like Agenda 21 itself, or they like it in part.

But they will push Agenda 21 anyway, and will keep trying for a global government, and many people will be in agreement with it fully, and some will only like it in part, but all the nations will probably do something at least in part.

It is hard to get the people of the world to collaborate together to be as one, which America is a good example of that as they fight over Right Wing and Left Wing, and do not want to lose their freedoms.

So it can take years before this could happen, and some leaders being replaced that go along with it for their beliefs are different, or can be persuaded.

That is why the target date is 2030 for Agenda 21 to be implemented in the nations, but it could be pushed ahead of that date.

But eventually it will happen that there is a global government, but it will have to be harmony between religions, and government, which the new age movement is a harmony between atheism, and spirituality, for they believe they are still evolving to be spiritual, and harmony between communism and democracy.

But to have a global government it has to be done slowly so it can take many years to put people, and systems in balance, and Agenda 21 could change somewhat as the years go by.

When there is a global government it cannot start out too strict, and it cannot be fully communism, or totalitarian, for the people would never agree to that so it has to start out with freedoms, and a little more strict than America, but then as years go by it will turn in to a totalitarian state because when the nations come together then the New Age Christ will work in the world.

 

[soggykitten]

It is a non-binding plan, but they agreed to it so they think it is a good idea for sustainable development, but it must be they do not want it to be binding to have the pressure to be locked in to an agreement that would bind the nations together, which shows how many nations want to keep their sovereignty, and do not want a global government, although they like Agenda 21 itself, or they like it in part.

But they will push Agenda 21 anyway, and will keep trying for a global government, and many people will be in agreement with it fully, and some will only like it in part, but all the nations will probably do something at least in part.

It is hard to get the people of the world to collaborate together to be as one, which America is a good example of that as they fight over Right Wing and Left Wing, and do not want to lose their freedoms.

So it can take years before this could happen, and some leaders being replaced that go along with it for their beliefs are different, or can be persuaded.

That is why the target date is 2030 for Agenda 21 to be implemented in the nations, but it could be pushed ahead of that date.

But eventually it will happen that there is a global government, but it will have to be harmony between religions, and government, which the new age movement is a harmony between atheism, and spirituality, for they believe they are still evolving to be spiritual, and harmony between communism and democracy.

But to have a global government it has to be done slowly so it can take many years to put people, and systems in balance, and Agenda 21 could change somewhat as the years go by.

When there is a global government it cannot start out too strict, and it cannot be fully communism, or totalitarian, for the people would never agree to that so it has to start out with freedoms, and a little more strict than America, but then as years go by it will turn in to a totalitarian state because when the nations come together then the New Age Christ will work in the world.

Yes, I saw where in the one video posted it is said that the plan as outlined in the 2000 page UN document launch date would now be in 2030. If I recall, the year 2000 was initially the date but things didn't work out so that that was the case.

I don't doubt there is a shift in governance already and across the globe. As others believe also, I think what we're seeing done with this Covid 19 thing is part of the A21 plan. In that this is something like a social experiment to see for how long these lock down rules and restrictions will be tolerated by the American public. Particularly the Christian community that are targeted and restricted as pertains to our worship and attendance at church.

I think especially so is the case when California church members are told by the department of health that while we're allowed to attend church in a limited number, must wear masks and hold to the social distancing rule of 6ft. , we are also not allowed to sing hymns.
I think that absurd rule is designed to gauge our level of compliance particularly as pertains to our worship time together. We have to mask up so as not to spread or contract the virus, seat ourselves six feet apart, but we can't sing to God? There isn't a valid rational reason for that rule to exist in my view. And yet there it is.

I really do think we're being tested to see how far we'll all as Americans bend under the implied threat of this virus. But when the safety measures are more of a threat to our freedom and liberties than is the virus to our health, given the lies about numbers of deaths and positive tests for Covid 19, just how safe are we?
Protect ourselves from the virus. But who protects us from a dictatorial government in certain states?

 

[BrianFochler]

"America is now the least racist white majority society in the world. Has a better record of legal protections of minorites than any other societies white or black. Offers more opportunities to a greater number of black persons than any other society, including all those of Africa".

Orlando Patterson, 1991, sociologist, left wing, Harvard teacher, known for his work regarding issues of race in the United States.

It is now a standard trope, implanted in freshmen summer reading lists through the works of Ta-Nehesi Coates and others, that whites pose a severe, if not mortal, threat to blacks.

Just this month, the Bureau of Justice Statistics released its 2018 survey of criminal victimization.

According to the study, there were 593,598 interracial violent victimizations (excluding homicide) between blacks and whites last year, including white-on-black and black-on-white attacks.

Blacks committed 537,204 of those interracial felonies, or 90 percent, and whites committed 56,394 of them, or less than 10 percent.

Blacks are also overrepresented among perpetrators of hate crimes—by 50 percent—according to the most recent Justice Department data from 2017; whites are underrepresented by 24 percent.

It does not matter if it is a white police officer, or a white civilian, prejudice is prejudice, if they can really prove it's prejudice.

But America has a better opportunity for black people than any other nation, so if they cry about America they will have to cry about the whole world for they would not have it better.

And black people commit more felonies against white people than white people commit against black people.

And they see all the black people who are successful being millionaires, and billionaires, and great jobs, and doing all the jobs that white people are doing.

So BLM does not make sense given this information.

But it makes sense for there is an agenda there to try to make a change to go towards a more strict government where all are equal economically, and social status wise.

And many black people probably do not care if freedoms are gone, and no more pursuit of money and material things to go above their wants, and do not care if they knock down all the black people who are rich and successful, as long as they can bring the white people down and they lose everything for all will be equal.

All the while America treats them better, and more opportunities than any other nation on the planet, and they commit felonies against white people than white people commit against them.

In Galatians 1:13-17, Paul recounts his dramatic confrontation with Christ on the Damascus road and his subsequent conversion. (Acts 9:1-30) God not only intended to change Saul's theology; He was determined to transform his bigoted view of the world. Paul's experience forces us to ask; What attitudes of prejudice keep us from recognizing God's heart for the whole world? What attitudes of bigotry operate where we live or work? Do we in any way challenge that thinking, or do we just keep silent – or worse, go along with it or even promote it? Would God be able to use you to bear His name to people from a different ethnic heritage? In the OT things were steadily going down hill between the Jews and the Gentiles until in Jesus day the woman at the well was astonished that Jesus would even talk to her. (Just remember Jesus was just a ordinary man like any other without sin) (John 4:9 The Samaritan woman said to him, ‘You are a Jew and I am a Samaritan woman. How can you ask me for a drink?’ (For Jews do not associate with Samaritans.)) It is not the person from the radically different culture on the other side of the world that is hardest to love, but the nearby neighbour whose skin colour, language, rituals, values, ancestry, history, and customs are different from our own. Jews had no dealings with Samaritans. With whom do we have no dealings? Paul challenges believers to pursue unity in the body of Christ and charity among peoples of the world. Are we as believers carrying out that exhortation? Had the Church wholeheartedly embraced Paul's teaching, It would not have kept it's tragic silence or participated in some of the great evils of the past 2,000 years. God's desire is clear – to have mercy on all. (Romans 11:32 or God has bound everyone over to disobedience so that he may have mercy on them all.)

 

[acts5_29]

I can help you make sense of Black Lives Matter.

See, the first word:. Black. Refers to a race of people. These are people of a dark skin color.

Second word:. Lives. Scripture says, "Thou shalt not murder.". It does not distinguish based upon race.

Third word:. Matter. We as Christians are supposed to be up in arms about injustice, and we are supposed to fight sin--especially murder. In this case, we are specifically saying that that includes when the victims of the sin are of a black race.


Anyway, good luck in your next ESL class.

 

[DWR]

ALL lives mater.
What I see way too often in these protest is a complete disregard for the rights of anyone who is not a part of the protest.
Seems it always leads to the destruction of property and putting the life of others in danger.
I see that last night these so called peaceful protestors attacked a US Senator in the US Capitol.
Every one has a right to speak. No problem with people standing in public and voicing their grievances.
But many of these people are nothing more than thugs and should be treated according.

 

[TravelerInTheWilderness]

I still want justice for George Floyd. I was really fired up after it all happened. But I feel so burned out from all this senseless destruction. Every day, I hear of businesses in my area being attacked. I'm tired of the sanctimonious remarks of "It says a lot that you're more concerned about businesses than human lives." They had nothing to do with this. Many of those businesses are owned by people of color. Senseless destruction solves nothing.

 

[BrianFochler]

Now let's take a moment to think about who has more colour. I am as belonging to a white ethnic group, so one could say I am white. (I am not talking about my little dog) Give me a sun burn I am red, give me a sun tan I am brown, If I lack O2 oxygen I am purple, If parts of my body freeze I am black. Now let's compare an African/African American, skin colour very dark brown. Give him a sun burn he is very dark brown, give him a sun tan he is very dark brown, if he lacks O2 oxygen he is very dark brown, if any part of his body freezes, he is very, very dark brown. Now who is the coloured person? It sure not the African/African American. Why do we get all bent out of shape because some people have more/less pigment in their skin? It all boils down to two people in the garden of Eden and one hell bound snake and eating the forbidden fruit. The answer is believing Jesus death on the cross has saved us from our sins and LOVE (1 Corinthians 13)

 

[Absolutely]

I can help you make sense of Black Lives Matter.

See, the first word:. Black. Refers to a race of people. These are people of a dark skin color.

Second word:. Lives. Scripture says, "Thou shalt not murder.". It does not distinguish based upon race.

Third word:. Matter. We as Christians are supposed to be up in arms about injustice, and we are supposed to fight sin--especially murder. In this case, we are specifically saying that that includes when the victims of the sin are of a black race.


Anyway, good luck in your next ESL class.

Now decode "all lives matter"

 

[hornetguy]

I can help you make sense of Black Lives Matter.

See, the first word:. Black. Refers to a race of people. These are people of a dark skin color.

Second word:. Lives. Scripture says, "Thou shalt not murder.". It does not distinguish based upon race.

Third word:. Matter. We as Christians are supposed to be up in arms about injustice, and we are supposed to fight sin--especially murder. In this case, we are specifically saying that that includes when the victims of the sin are of a black race.


Anyway, good luck in your next ESL class.

 

[Funkus]

And the one standing behind this destructive and anarchistic Marxist agenda is Satan himself. Satan has been working on destroying America with its freedoms since at least 2008. But the ones who should have stood up to lawlessness became cowardly, and allowed the lawlessness to proceed without serious consequences. Now the Democrats are the party of lawlessness.

damn do you know how many people will agree with you?
think of women - feminism wants to destroy them. it is anti-women and is destroying women's soul. The basic fact that women and men are equal is not what feminism is now. It has morphed into something that harms them. So how many people will stand up to this?

There's no political solution only spriritual ones so if you are spiritually inclined try to leave politics behind and take up spirituality instead