Who will Win
- Thread starter JJay
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
I agree but what I learned in civics was that the government's sole purpose in at least our socio-economic comparison between corruption and the markets. Was to combat immorality by only enforcing fairness in the markets. Promote competition and free trade exchange. They can choose to set tax limits but technically this is voted by the closest branch to the people (congress) and even then it should be within the limits of the Constitution in less voted on.
So technically a capitalist free market economy in theory must have checks and balances. So balanced by the government but checked by the people.
This is why Christians must be involved politically and socially. Because immorality will corrupt any human system.
So technically a capitalist free market economy in theory must have checks and balances. So balanced by the government but checked by the people.
This is why Christians must be involved politically and socially. Because immorality will corrupt any human system.
-
2
- Show all
E
Yes that is what I meant by regulation. Agree.
Yes I would agree it must, however the system has become so complex, that does not help.
I agree Christians should never abdicate their role in society, they need to be models, ... yet not to impose but as much as possible to win the argument by reason and logic.
Yes I would agree it must, however the system has become so complex, that does not help.
I agree Christians should never abdicate their role in society, they need to be models, ... yet not to impose but as much as possible to win the argument by reason and logic.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?st...view_time.1607798681:filter.h_nor&__tn__=EH-R
Sir, while I can recognize and acknowledge your means for deduction, generalizations and reasoning - I also acknowledge your rather astute and masterful debating skills... The makings of a good lawyer - fully capable of making the case for whichever side or position that you choose defend.
I on the other hand tend to see things thru a different lens and often in broader terms of observation.
While I am not in the business of trying to influence or bias other people's decision making processes - but since you asked my opinion I am glad to response... Albeit, I have to say that I do not see the point of this sort of inquiry - knowing that it only serves as a mere distraction away from the bigger more strategic picture at stake for our democracy...
Recall my comment applied to 'Politicians' - being that given the distrust of biased MSM and SM tech giants (censorship, dishonest reporting - don't believe your own eyes - no violence, riots or looting to see here)...
I suggest that 'we' demand EQUAL vetting and professional journalistic reporting upon all news worthy Politicians; Not only should we question what all Politicians 'say' (it's about what they 'do' anyway) 'we' should also question (from this point forward) what we hear and see from MSM and SM - forever, or until they are held accountable for fair and balanced reporting
IMHO, Yes, Cruz eyeing his run in 2016 and prospect for 2024 was, is and would be a very smart Political play to attempt to garner Trump's base to build upon for his personal favor as a point of departure for 2024... I would advise 'we' refrain from using potentially flawed (if then) logic in validating our personal assumptions to discern judgements of others...
If we have re-learned anything from the 2020 elections, primaries and debates - if we are objectively looking at it equitably from both sides... We can confirm that Politicians (on both sides) can be found contradicting themselves, and striving to gain whatever political advantage they can for their Personal Gains (first) and their Party (second)... Recall Kamala's scathing racist accusations of Biden during their primary debate... We can play this tit for tat back and forth all day... But at the end of the day emotional debates about personality quirks or 'he said, she said' are mere mouse holes - given the bigger picture, consequences and stakes...
My bigger and more significant comment remains the more strategic issue and concern for the future state of our democracy: where "the Enemy of My Enemy is My Friend..." Where Cruz see's that he and Trump and 74K+ Patriots are on the side of defending our US Constitution against all Enemies... Where the common Enemy are the perceived Puppeteers who have financed, enabled and/or orchestrated Leftest Operatives whose actions and activities continue to raise more than a reasonable doubt about the current and future integrity of our once trusted liberty and democracy.
I'm a professional research analyst - I'm all about proving or dis-proving hypotheses and coming away with a better and more grounded understanding of the ground-truth... The analogy being 'Instant Replay' in professional or Olympic sports... Anyone who opposes an analogous 'Instant Replay' to fairly and objectively adjudicate the rightful winner (left or right) - IMHO is essentially exposing themselves as being completely BIASED to tilt the rules as long as they favor their side... As such, they are essentially declaring themselves to be on the side of the Enemy of our Constitutional Democracy...
Sir, while I can recognize and acknowledge your means for deduction, generalizations and reasoning - I also acknowledge your rather astute and masterful debating skills... The makings of a good lawyer - fully capable of making the case for whichever side or position that you choose defend.
I on the other hand tend to see things thru a different lens and often in broader terms of observation.
While I am not in the business of trying to influence or bias other people's decision making processes - but since you asked my opinion I am glad to response... Albeit, I have to say that I do not see the point of this sort of inquiry - knowing that it only serves as a mere distraction away from the bigger more strategic picture at stake for our democracy...
Recall my comment applied to 'Politicians' - being that given the distrust of biased MSM and SM tech giants (censorship, dishonest reporting - don't believe your own eyes - no violence, riots or looting to see here)...
I suggest that 'we' demand EQUAL vetting and professional journalistic reporting upon all news worthy Politicians; Not only should we question what all Politicians 'say' (it's about what they 'do' anyway) 'we' should also question (from this point forward) what we hear and see from MSM and SM - forever, or until they are held accountable for fair and balanced reporting
IMHO, Yes, Cruz eyeing his run in 2016 and prospect for 2024 was, is and would be a very smart Political play to attempt to garner Trump's base to build upon for his personal favor as a point of departure for 2024... I would advise 'we' refrain from using potentially flawed (if then) logic in validating our personal assumptions to discern judgements of others...
If we have re-learned anything from the 2020 elections, primaries and debates - if we are objectively looking at it equitably from both sides... We can confirm that Politicians (on both sides) can be found contradicting themselves, and striving to gain whatever political advantage they can for their Personal Gains (first) and their Party (second)... Recall Kamala's scathing racist accusations of Biden during their primary debate... We can play this tit for tat back and forth all day... But at the end of the day emotional debates about personality quirks or 'he said, she said' are mere mouse holes - given the bigger picture, consequences and stakes...
My bigger and more significant comment remains the more strategic issue and concern for the future state of our democracy: where "the Enemy of My Enemy is My Friend..." Where Cruz see's that he and Trump and 74K+ Patriots are on the side of defending our US Constitution against all Enemies... Where the common Enemy are the perceived Puppeteers who have financed, enabled and/or orchestrated Leftest Operatives whose actions and activities continue to raise more than a reasonable doubt about the current and future integrity of our once trusted liberty and democracy.
I'm a professional research analyst - I'm all about proving or dis-proving hypotheses and coming away with a better and more grounded understanding of the ground-truth... The analogy being 'Instant Replay' in professional or Olympic sports... Anyone who opposes an analogous 'Instant Replay' to fairly and objectively adjudicate the rightful winner (left or right) - IMHO is essentially exposing themselves as being completely BIASED to tilt the rules as long as they favor their side... As such, they are essentially declaring themselves to be on the side of the Enemy of our Constitutional Democracy...
-
2
- Show all
That is why I am an originalist in the context of how it was intended. An immoral culture will corrupt the economy and the government. Things will become more complex to combat the rise in immorality. But in the process of controlling corruption, the culture is corrupting the officials who are supposed to be controlling the corruption.
If impose you mean not to force people to worship our God then yes. But if impose as in a set of morals then I do believe we should vote on morals that protect life, liberty, and property. To protect people's civil rights.
I believe those morals are of the Biblical God.
If impose you mean not to force people to worship our God then yes. But if impose as in a set of morals then I do believe we should vote on morals that protect life, liberty, and property. To protect people's civil rights.
I believe those morals are of the Biblical God.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Judge to conduct hearing on whether to lift protective order, release Antrim County results
PAUL EGAN | DETROIT FREE PRESS | 8 minutes ago
LANSING — A judge is expected to hold a hearing Monday morning on a lawyer’s request to lift a protective order shielding the results of a court-ordered examination of voting equipment in Antrim County — a county that President Donald Trump easily won, but where his legal team is alleging irregularities.
PAUL EGAN | DETROIT FREE PRESS | 8 minutes ago
LANSING — A judge is expected to hold a hearing Monday morning on a lawyer’s request to lift a protective order shielding the results of a court-ordered examination of voting equipment in Antrim County — a county that President Donald Trump easily won, but where his legal team is alleging irregularities.
-
2
- Show all
E
I understand your point of view ... however I am more persuaded that our primary role is to spread the Gospel and then the result will be people living under grace as planned by God.
Tell me do you think adulterers and homosexuals should be put in jail?
Where do we draw the line?
Tell me do you think adulterers and homosexuals should be put in jail?
Where do we draw the line?
-
1
-
1
- Show all
100% Correct!
The democratic run cities are staying afloat on the backs of hard working Americans and their federal tax dollars
If conservative States were to succeed, property values in Democratic controlled States would plummet
Who wants to live amongst criminal thugs, cashless bail, defund the police, open the prisons, protect the criminals?
Nobody but criminals want to live in such a place?
The democratic run cities are staying afloat on the backs of hard working Americans and their federal tax dollars
If conservative States were to succeed, property values in Democratic controlled States would plummet
Who wants to live amongst criminal thugs, cashless bail, defund the police, open the prisons, protect the criminals?
Nobody but criminals want to live in such a place?
That's exactly where the Trump red wave was, no doubt in my mind
Historical Key Indicators, President Trump Won Ohio by 8% Florida by 4%, as the (Fake News) suppression polls had it reversed
Took 97% of the 24 Bellwether counties, never seen before in history, President Trump smashed all historical voting records
You bet it was a red wave, stolen in criminal fraud and corruption
Historical Key Indicators, President Trump Won Ohio by 8% Florida by 4%, as the (Fake News) suppression polls had it reversed
Took 97% of the 24 Bellwether counties, never seen before in history, President Trump smashed all historical voting records
You bet it was a red wave, stolen in criminal fraud and corruption
-
1
- Show all
Gods will is to have a Government to (Punish) evildoers
The Democratic party and Biden/Harris supports and defends (Evildoers)
Killing the innocent unborn (Abortion) Evil
Defund the police, cashless bail, (Evil)
Same Sex Marriage (Evil)
1 Peter 2:13-15KJV
13 Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme;
14 Or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of evildoers, and for the praise of them that do well.
15 For so is the will of God, that with well doing ye may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men:
The Democratic party and Biden/Harris supports and defends (Evildoers)
Killing the innocent unborn (Abortion) Evil
Defund the police, cashless bail, (Evil)
Same Sex Marriage (Evil)
1 Peter 2:13-15KJV
13 Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme;
14 Or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of evildoers, and for the praise of them that do well.
15 For so is the will of God, that with well doing ye may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men:
I strongly believe the Dominion/Smartmatic voting system put Obama in office?
This voting system has been in operation within the US since 2005, since Dominions acquisition of "Sequoia" who controlled the US market in voting machines and tabulation?
Obama 2008-2012? Dominion/Smartmatic
This voting system has been in operation within the US since 2005, since Dominions acquisition of "Sequoia" who controlled the US market in voting machines and tabulation?
Obama 2008-2012? Dominion/Smartmatic
-
1
- Show all
- Status