Annnnnd that would be Jesus...
Semantics are involved, but - yes - I believe that would be a valid way to put it - only, not in an all-inclusive sense with respect to God in general - it does not apply directly to the Father.
However, with specific regard to Jesus the God-man, I believe it may be considered to be a valid statement.
If this doesn't make sense, read the OP of the thread I linked to...