Is the double slit experiment proof of original sin?
- Thread starter pittsburghjoe
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Original Sin caused us to join the present state ..the now. Fallen angels were already here. Satan started it. But I don't think there was a physical history until humans joined. Time here is a slideshow of present states. An infinite sum of waves collapsing each frame.
Time Dilation and Gravity is the amount of wave collapse in a scalar volume per frame.
Time Dilation and Gravity is the amount of wave collapse in a scalar volume per frame.
you do not have a 'present' -- you only have a past and a future.
it is God who is I AM -- the eternally present. and you call Him "sin"
i don't understand why you're fine with doing that, either. i think it's probably related to how you're fine with contradicting the scripture, but i haven't quite put the proverbial finger on it. some of it, am sure, has to do with your fundamental misunderstandings of physics, but i think that's secondary, not causal.
it is God who is I AM -- the eternally present. and you call Him "sin"
i don't understand why you're fine with doing that, either. i think it's probably related to how you're fine with contradicting the scripture, but i haven't quite put the proverbial finger on it. some of it, am sure, has to do with your fundamental misunderstandings of physics, but i think that's secondary, not causal.
-
1
- Show all
Is there gravity in Heaven? Is this why Jesus ascended into Heaven?
If there isn't wave collapse, is there hot and cold?
A constant state of decoherence causes age.
Gravity is from the amount of atoms that need to remain wave collapsed per volume.
Time and Gravity are linked because they both are fundamental to this fallen condition.
If there isn't wave collapse, is there hot and cold?
A constant state of decoherence causes age.
Gravity is from the amount of atoms that need to remain wave collapsed per volume.
Time and Gravity are linked because they both are fundamental to this fallen condition.
-
1
- Show all
Jesus was physical before ascending. Did He become molecules in order to ascend?
First and foremost, we need to establish ONE LAW. That is, the Laws of Physics DO NOT APPLY TO GOD!
A Miracle, is the single best example of where the Laws of Physics give way to the Will of God.
You are applying Physics to the Realm of Heaven, the Realm where God defies the Laws of Physics. Heaven would be a [perfect example] of a Miracle.
Your first error and greatest error is assigning human laws of Physics to God. Then the continued error you keep making is to combine God's Creation and Satan's Sin Nature to the human Laws of Physics.
But if God and Satan defy the Laws of Physics, the use of Science to explain [SIN] is redundantly [Stupid]!
Only you know what it is you've accomplished because the rest of us know your hypothesis using Science is retarded when trying to deal with SIN.
Sin is like a Miracle.
There's no limits because there's no Laws refraining when we want to sin and when God wants to perform a Miracle.
Simply put, You're a legend in your own mind while the rest of us are looking at you like you're bat poo crazy!
I am not afraid of Science. My entire paycheck is based upon several uses of quantum mechanics and multiple aspects of the Sciences.
My point however is this, I know when Science is the answer and when it stops being the answer because God is the FIRST LAW!
You clearly don't know that God is the First Law or you would not be pushing this tripe.
My point however is this, I know when Science is the answer and when it stops being the answer because God is the FIRST LAW!
You clearly don't know that God is the First Law or you would not be pushing this tripe.
How could Adam and Eve then sin since according to you, they had no physical history???
Making plain your nonsense once again
How many times is that now?
I have lost count
Making plain your nonsense once again
How many times is that now?
I have lost count
Yeah, I'll ask one last thing and hope this time I get an answer.
Decoherence
Retrocasuality
Particles
all represent energy, the definition of certain energy, and flow/change in flow of energy.
Obviously, to you we must also be this energy since we are ultimately connected to the Universe as a whole.
Do You think God is [Energy]?
Decoherence
Retrocasuality
Particles
all represent energy, the definition of certain energy, and flow/change in flow of energy.
Obviously, to you we must also be this energy since we are ultimately connected to the Universe as a whole.
Do You think God is [Energy]?
No I am not, and you should KNOW that I am not because I have pointed out to you at least once that there was no apple. You contradict yourself all over the place and defeat your own arguments. Your claim is they were not physical at all and therefore, with no physical history, could not sin. Bunkum!!! Give it up, man.
You have shown yourself incapable and unwilling to admit when you are wrong.
In lieu of that, I suggest you stick to Scripture
Though you prolly will not.
You seem incapable and unwilling of that also
You have been been so deceived by your vain philosophy
you do not even know that "vain" means useless LOL
Though you do seek something in desiring to wake millions
Whatever it is, is part of your delusion.
In lieu of that, I suggest you stick to Scripture
Though you prolly will not.
You seem incapable and unwilling of that also
You have been been so deceived by your vain philosophy
you do not even know that "vain" means useless LOL
Though you do seek something in desiring to wake millions
Whatever it is, is part of your delusion.
Theoretically speaking here, this statement is a Fact!
It's actually a very good definition.
And the transition from one to the other is logically sound.
On this statement, if this Statement here equaled everything you have posted prior, we are in [Agreement].
It's when you try to get specific in your examples is where my [red light] starts flashing to proceed with caution.