submit a bible question

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
#41
Matthew 18:20:

Where two or three are gathered in my name, there I am in the midst of them.

This is often used to say Jesus is in the midst of two or three Christian's gathered for ANY purpose.

I disagree with this though because the context is primarily about resolving sin issues between Christians in a local church setting.
Its the same problem with
Hebrews 10:25

“Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching.”
If i had a penny for eveytime this is used today for the church.
 
B

Blackpowderduelist

Guest
#42
Nope . No one was ' in christ ' until the giving of the Holy spirit . Prior to Paul revealing being ' in Jesus ' this was a mystery.
There is no salvation out side of Christ.
Abraham is in Christ.
Everyone who is saved is in Christ.
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
#43
There is no salvation out side of Christ.
Abraham is in Christ.
Everyone who is saved is in Christ.
Abraham was not ' in christ ' nor was Jesus ' in him ' . He was not ' regenerated ' , nor indwelt by the Holy Spirit . He was saved but nothing happened to him like we experience today .
 
B

Blackpowderduelist

Guest
#44
Abraham was not ' in christ ' nor was Jesus ' in him ' . He was not ' regenerated ' , nor indwelt by the Holy Spirit . He was saved but nothing happened to him like we experience today .
He is saved from the penalty of sin, which is death and the second death. There is no salvation outside of Christ. We as Christians are grafted into ...
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
#45
He is saved from the penalty of sin, which is death and the second death. There is no salvation outside of Christ. We as Christians are grafted into ...
The best Abraham could atain was Abrahams bosom. Awaiting His redemption . Yes now he is redeemed After the cross.
 

Blik

Senior Member
Dec 6, 2016
7,312
2,428
113
#46
I agree with the first question, infact I hate this postmodernist view of that which is Holy.
The context of that passage is men of God gathered to bring restoration to an errant brother, which is the most sacred and holy thing we can do. We by decree of Jesus shelf wield kingdom authority to forgive sins in Jesus name. This is not a common thing it is Holy and should be treated as such.
I think the context of this scripture is told to us with the words "in my name" and there are no other words limiting the context.

Any time any two or more Christians meet in the name of Christ, speaking to Christ on any subject together, Christ is there with them.
 

Blik

Senior Member
Dec 6, 2016
7,312
2,428
113
#47
Abraham was not ' in christ ' nor was Jesus ' in him ' . He was not ' regenerated ' , nor indwelt by the Holy Spirit . He was saved but nothing happened to him like we experience today .
We are told Christ was in the beginning, and the old testament often speaks of Christ. There is no forgiveness of sin without Christ, that is a fact that didn't become fact at the birth of Christ in Bethlehem, but the instant sin was released in the world God gave blood on the altar for our souls as we are told in Leviticus.

The wages of sin is death, that is an eternal fact also true in the thousands of years before Christ, it is an eternal truth. Yet the 51st Psalm, written well before Bethlehem, speaks of forgiveness. That is what the sacrificial system is all about for in Israel the Lord tells us that He hates the blood of animals, and in Leviticus that there is no forgiveness of sin without blood.
 

Blik

Senior Member
Dec 6, 2016
7,312
2,428
113
#48
The best Abraham could atain was Abrahams bosom. Awaiting His redemption . Yes now he is redeemed After the cross.
But when the curtain was split at the death of Christ, the saints rose from their graves and walked the streets of Jerusalem.
 
T

TheIndianGirl

Guest
#49
Matthew 5:32
But I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

Matthew 1:19
Chapter Parallel Compare
Because Joseph her husband was faithful to the law, and yet did not want to expose her to public disgrace, he had in mind to divorce her quietly.

Romans 7:2
For a married woman is bound by law to her husband while he lives, but if her husband dies she is released from the law of marriage.



The Bible allows divorce for adultery. However, the relevant verses state "man." Does it mean that only men are permitted to divorce their wives, but not vice versa? Do these verses also apply to women? I know some conservative men who say only men can divorce their wives, not vice versa.

I believe these verses apply to both men and women. Adultery is a severe sin which calls for divorce. I don't see why only the man is allowed divorce, but not woman.
 

wattie

Senior Member
Feb 24, 2009
3,236
1,130
113
New Zealand
#50
One should be able to extrapolate from things that are stated. If Jesus is present when a church is determining whether a member should be dis-fellowshipped, why would He be absent when a few gather for worship? Indeed that is an even greater reason for Him to be present. The Catholic Church (through their Mass) has always insisted on "the Real Presence" of Christ. While the Mass is unscriptural (to say the least) the idea of the presence of Christ during worship is perfectly Scriptural and valid.
Yes, the application of matthew 18 :20 can be extended to other gatherings in a church setting.


Jesus isn't 'only' in the midst for the resolving of sin issues, but for Matthew 18:20 that is the main context.

I contend though it is for a local church setting for being in 'the midst'

Of course not the building but the members gathered as a church
 

Edify

Well-known member
Jan 27, 2021
1,559
656
113
#51
I would like to see those who have well-thought-out Biblical questions that they do not understand or do not agree with..

  1. Please submit the Bible verse or verses
  2. ask your question
  3. why you agree or disagree with the position you have applied from the verses
  4. support with the Bible why you agree or disagree

Thank you,
Honestly, I have to wonder why you posted this.
I could post a question because I want to look smart.
I could post a question because I want to start an argument.
I could just start a new thread & make my point. Why would I mix it in with this one?
I'll just pass on this for now...:)
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
#52
We are told Christ was in the beginning, and the old testament often speaks of Christ. There is no forgiveness of sin without Christ, that is a fact that didn't become fact at the birth of Christ in Bethlehem, but the instant sin was released in the world God gave blood on the altar for our souls as we are told in Leviticus.

The wages of sin is death, that is an eternal fact also true in the thousands of years before Christ, it is an eternal truth. Yet the 51st Psalm, written well before Bethlehem, speaks of forgiveness. That is what the sacrificial system is all about for in Israel the Lord tells us that He hates the blood of animals, and in Leviticus that there is no forgiveness of sin without blood.
Remission but not redemption.
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
#53
But when the curtain was split at the death of Christ, the saints rose from their graves and walked the streets of Jerusalem.
Yes at the cross . Redemption.
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,066
4,348
113
#54
Honestly, I have to wonder why you posted this.
I could post a question because I want to look smart.
I could post a question because I want to start an argument.
I could just start a new thread & make my point. Why would I mix it in with this one?
I'll just pass on this for now...:)
you will decide why you ask a question the motive is up to you :)
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,066
4,348
113
#55
Matthew 18:20:

Where two or three are gathered in my name, there I am in the midst of them.

This is often used to say Jesus is in the midst of two or three Christian's gathered for ANY purpose.

I disagree with this though because the context is primarily about resolving sin issues between Christians in a local church setting.
interesting question LOL
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,066
4,348
113
#56
  1. 1 Samuel 21:9
  2. why was Goliath's sword behind the ephod?
    1. what does it represent in type?
    2. what does its presence behind the ephod represent?
    3. what does it mean that David was given it? that he hadn't kept it since he took it? that it wound up the possession of the priest?
    4. why was it wrapped up? what does that represent?
    5. what's the analogous complement to this in the NT, in the life of Christ?
  3. i've not really found any actual position on this. basically preachers don't talk about it.
  4. nothing to agree or disagree with ((yet)) - just a question no one seems to be asking and a topic no one seems to be looking into.
why was the sword of Goliath behind the ephod ? very interesting question, and I can only provide an opinion and maybe be wrong :)
The weapon of your enemy will be used on them the word of God says, but the best way to fight is to pray before you take the sword to battle. In addition the weapon of goliath was a testimony of Gods deliverance from your enemies.

This to was why God had the Ark also known as the "Testmony " thathad items in it that testified of Gods salvation, provision, and healing. Aaron's rod, the commadments, manna

Only the items that God said were to go into the Ark, how ever King David brought the items like the sword of goliath to testify of what God had done, and cause the King to remember What God had done.
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,066
4,348
113
#57
Matthew 5:32
But I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

Matthew 1:19
Chapter Parallel Compare
Because Joseph her husband was faithful to the law, and yet did not want to expose her to public disgrace, he had in mind to divorce her quietly.

Romans 7:2
For a married woman is bound by law to her husband while he lives, but if her husband dies she is released from the law of marriage.



The Bible allows divorce for adultery. However, the relevant verses state "man." Does it mean that only men are permitted to divorce their wives, but not vice versa? Do these verses also apply to women? I know some conservative men who say only men can divorce their wives, not vice versa.

I believe these verses apply to both men and women. Adultery is a severe sin which calls for divorce. I don't see why only the man is allowed divorce, but not woman.
Very good question's.

many have said many things based on denomnations positions and etc..

Divorce God hates. However, What the law of Moses said Jesus brought clarity to and said as Moses " it was allowed because of the Hardness of your heart. Matthew 5 speaks on this Jesus said after asked the question of this very topic.

starting in verse 27

27 “You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ 28 But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

Then Jesus says,

31 “Furthermore it has been said, ‘Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce.’ 32 But I say to you that whoever divorces his wife for any reason except sexual immorality causes her to commit adultery; and whoever marries a woman who is divorced commits adultery.

The religious leaders made a loop hole to divorce at will, marriage was the man taking the women to be, many times the women had no say in it. So when a women was exposed to man and she was found not to be a virgin you could legally put her away, in two ways. 1. do so quietly as Joseph wanted to do, or make the claim publicly she was not a virgin which then proof had to be provide.

In the Jewish tradition the consummating sealed the deal , unless she was not found to be a virgin.
what the sexual intercourse was done there was blood that would be on the cloth and this was given to the parents as a symbol of their daughters purity.

IF there Husband made the claim that his wife was unfaith in context to her not being a virgin that was abig disagree to the family
They would bring that cloth with the blood on it and show the edlers this false claim and the husband would have to 1. remain married 2. pay the father for the insult.


Now Marriage was established by God in Genesis 2:24 which Jesus repeated in Matthew 19:3-10

3.The Pharisees also came to Him, testing Him, and saying to Him, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for just any reason?”


4
And He answered and said to them, “Have you not read that He who made them at the beginning ‘made them male and female,’ 5 and said, For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’ ?

Here Jesus just quoted Gen 2:24

6So then, they are no longer two but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate.”
If they have become one as God said How can you divorce ? Can God divorce Himself? no that is the concept MARRIAGE IS TWO BECOMING ONE. This is why the dicples said later "If such is the case of the man with his wife, it is better not to marry.”

7 They said to Him, “Why then did Moses command to give a certificate of divorce, and to put her away?”
8 He said to them, “Moses, because of the hardness of your hearts, permitted you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so.


Jesus here is speaking from the beginning meaning Genesis 2:24 Then Jesus raised the standard and gave a higher law on this topic

9 "And I say to you," Any where in the New Testamant Jesus says " I say unto you " is authoritative and the standard.


whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, this is the new standard Jesus is not hearing your paper of divorcement anymore if she was not a virgin, or was sleeping with another man, you cannot divorce her.


and marries another, commits adultery; and whoever marries her who is divorced commits adultery.”
10 His disciples said to Him, “If such is the case of the man with his wife, it is better not to marry.”


in this culture if a man divorced his wife and could not return to her father's house there were only a few things she could do

1. suffer the penalty of death by stoning 2. forced to become a harlot that is what Jesus is saying here when he said
You cause the women to commit adultery" Matthew 5:32


Yes to your answer you are correct this applies to both who are married but at this time women were not as they are today they could not be independent they were to be dependant on the father then their husband, and later in life if as a widow , the church.
 

Lanolin

Well-known member
Dec 15, 2018
23,460
7,188
113
#58
questions --so how could they tell if she was consummating or just menstruating?

Or, was it just to tell if she was of age. Because making a virgin bleed is a good thing?
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,066
4,348
113
#59
questions --so how could they tell if she was consummating or just menstruating?

Or, was it just to tell if she was of age. Because making a virgin bleed is a good thing?
What a foolish comment and frankly perverted. If you understand the law when a women was on her menistration, she was considered unclean. it is not the idea of making one "bleed" it was something that happened.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,844
13,558
113
#60
why was the sword of Goliath behind the ephod ? very interesting question, and I can only provide an opinion and maybe be wrong :)
The weapon of your enemy will be used on them the word of God says, but the best way to fight is to pray before you take the sword to battle. In addition the weapon of goliath was a testimony of Gods deliverance from your enemies.

This to was why God had the Ark also known as the "Testmony " thathad items in it that testified of Gods salvation, provision, and healing. Aaron's rod, the commadments, manna

Only the items that God said were to go into the Ark, how ever King David brought the items like the sword of goliath to testify of what God had done, and cause the King to remember What God had done.
thanks for the reply :)

i was thinking about the significance of it being there, and yeah, it relates to the objects placed in the ark - the jar of manna, Aaron's budded rod, the tablets. but it's not in the ark, tho it has a correlation. so it's similar but not the same as these.

and i was thinking, how did it get there? David brought Goliath's armament back to his own tent, and his head to Jerusalem (((1 Samuel 17:54)) -- as an aside, i believe David buried Goliath's head at Jerusalem and named the place "Golgatha" -- but 1 Samuel 17 is the last 'known location' of the sword of Goliath until we see it in Nob with the tabernacle -- in the sanctuary? or not? but there behind the ephod -- in 1 Samuel 21. so it was in David's possession. i don't think that it's the sort of thing you lose track of, but the sort of thing you treat very carefully and thoughtfully, so i infer that David knew it was there, that David himself had something to do with it being there. in the narrative the priests at Nob seem to be unjustly slain by an antichrist-type, as tho martyrs. like giving the sword of Goliath to the good-shepherd-king is something the world hates, tho that good-shepherd-king has every right to it; it belongs to David and he keeps it wrapped in cloth ((like a garment)), at the sanctuary of God behind the garment of the priest.

another question is where is Goliath's spear? why the sword and not the spear? where's Goliath's armor? why is the "set" broken up?
:unsure:

and the whole question brings up the ephod and everything about ephods. is this the high priest's ephod? is this another ephod. we've got Gideon making a golden ephod in Judges 8:27, and it becoming a snare to the people, who somehow became guilty of idolatry with it. is the ephod at Nob like this? so the sword of Goliath being there is a kind of 'bad thing' ? or is this the high priestly ephod, and the sword being there a 'good thing' ? Jesus mentions Davis going here and receiving the shewbread in Matthew 12:4, calling them innocent, so i get the sense Ahimelek wasn't doing evil, even tho Jesus doesn't mention Goliath's word changing hands at the same event. Saul kills Ahimelek when his evil Edomite shepherd, who was there, tells him what he's done to help David. in fact the evil shepherd is the one who kills him, because Saul's own men will not raise their hands against the priests, defying Saul's orders for fear of God. i don't see indications that Goliath's sword being present, or being given to David, are 'wrong things' in any sense.

it's a really interesting thing, with a puzzle hidden in it -- a kind of obvious question that people don't seem to look into, 'what's Goliath's sword doing there?' -- i mean, you brought up the manna and the rod and the tablets in the ark; there are clearly very important spiritual lessons in why those particular objects are where they are. since this sword is put alongside that, there has to be a deep meaning at the bottom of this, too.