TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jan 14, 2021
1,599
526
113
#61
I thought I explained it. I can copy and paste my own words if you'd like . . . but that seems rather elementary.

Edit - But now that I see that you've given me a "red X" only to then ask me to explain; I refuse to do so.
One possibility is that there was a transcription error that mistook the short form for Zechariah (Ζριου) for Jeremiah (Iμιου). Transcription errors have happened before in some publications, most notably in history an edition of the bible wrote "thou shall commit adultery" instead of "thou shall not commit adultery."

I find it impossible that the Holy Spirit would guide and teach the Apostles to in fact, guide and teach Gentiles and Jews alike to follow the Law of Moses.

Acts 15:29 NLT - "You must abstain from eating food offered to idols, from consuming blood or the meat of strangled animals, and from sexual immorality. If you do this, you will do well. Farewell."

And then we see the correction in 1 Corinthians:

1 Corinthians 8:10 NLT - "For if others see you--with your "superior knowledge"--eating in the temple of an idol, won't they be encouraged to violate their conscience by eating food that has been offered to an idol?"

The Acts 15 quite cannot possibly be correct, for the idea is corrected in 1 Corinthians.

Hey, I could always be wrong . . . I am always open to that possibility and fact.
Acts is written to Theophilus. It may be the case that Theophilus specifically should avoid those things, but that Paul describes the general rule in Corinthians about idolatry being borne in the heart and not by action alone.
 

DADZ

Banned
May 17, 2021
86
14
8
#62
Well, no . . . I'm not dead. In fact, I've been made alive by the Circumcision of Christ. See Colossians 2:9-15.
I dont mean YOU, I mean you as the person who had the money that eventually went to pay for the prostitutes. In the analogy, I assume he represents Judas, and Judas was dead
 

DADZ

Banned
May 17, 2021
86
14
8
#63
he's been snarking at people since he got here...calling someone stiff necked, saying shame on you to someone else, doesn't need to think about sin or confess sin, blah blah blah

and now we know we don't have to take the Bible all that seriously cause it's a bunch of opinions, and of course the all caps thingie

I predict this behavior will grate sooner rather than later :unsure: the usual boring person who tries to become the forum bully but wants respect

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
YEA, SHOW ME WHERE WE ARE COMMANDED TO CONFESS OUR SINS AFTER WE HAVE BEEN SAVED. AFTER. AFTER, YOU GUYS ARE CONFUSED. AND WHEN ITS SHOWN TO YOU, YOU REFUSE TO LISTEN. THAT IS WHAT IS CALLED STIFF NECKED.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#64
YEA, SHOW ME WHERE WE ARE COMMANDED TO CONFESS OUR SINS AFTER WE HAVE BEEN SAVED. AFTER. AFTER, YOU GUYS ARE CONFUSED. AND WHEN ITS SHOWN TO YOU, YOU REFUSE TO LISTEN. THAT IS WHAT IS CALLED STIFF NECKED.
Actually the word says it in a few places bro

if we confess our sins. We are believers

we are also told to confess our sins to others that we may be healed.
 

DADZ

Banned
May 17, 2021
86
14
8
#65
Really? The two accounts of Potters field and who purchased is totally, TOTALLY different.

And I agree with what else you've said regarding those disagreements. How can we say that the Bible is infallible if the Apostles couldn't agree?! LOL - It's crazy! And how about the fact that the early Apostles were literally teaching new "believers" to follow the Law of Moses? That . . . is just insane, considering that Jesus (the Nazarene which means to Set Apart) sets us apart (free) from the Law? Jews are no longer to follow the Law, and Gentiles no longer follow the Moral Law that has been written upon the hearts of all people (including Jeffrey Dahmer, Gary Ridgeway, and Adolf Hitler). Jesus sets us apart from these Laws, yet as mentioned, the Apostles were trying to figure things out themselves, and actually taught people to follow it . . . just unbelievable. Of course, I don't think that most even understand these things, because most don't read their Bibles and when they do, they don't try to even understand it.
Y

Yea, I get what u r saying. I think what some say is the accuracy of its recording is infalliable, although I disagree with that also. And yea, Paul and the others had major disagreement about teaching the law. You are on the money with that.

A lot of people have been taught, and have believed for years without exploring other possiblities or ideas. They become ingrained in their thinking. I think it is a result of their personality, a lot of insecurities
 

DADZ

Banned
May 17, 2021
86
14
8
#66
Just because different writers present different aspects of the same event does not mean that there was an error or a mistranslation. So since you brought this up why don't we try to harmonize the accounts.

1. In Matthew we read that Judas cast down the thirty pieces of silver in the temple and went and hanged himself (with no further comment). The chief priests refused to take the money back but purchased the potter's field with it, so that "strangers" (presumably non-Jews) could be buried there (similar to Boot Hill for outlaws in the Wild West). And because it was blood money, the field was called Akeldama (the Field of Blood) in Aramaic.

2. Mark simply states that Judas went to chief priests to betray Christ.

3. Luke says that Judas went to the chief priests and captains, and they covenanted to give him money.

4. John says that the devil put it into the heart of Judas to betray Christ. So after Christ fed Judas a morsel, Satan entered into him, and Christ sent him on his way to do what he planned to do. (Jesus knew all this in advance).

5. In Acts Peter said that it was Judas who purchased the field. But that would simply be because the money belonged to Judas. However Peter also said that Judas fell headlong and burst asunder in the midst of the field, and his intestines gushed out. Therefore we must conclude that after Akeldama was purchased, Judas heard about it, went to visit it, hanged himself in that field (presumably from a tree standing there), and when he died he fell to the earth and his abdomen was injured very seriously (perhaps impaled by a sharp rock).
when cops interogate a suspect who is actually innocent, they often find contradictions, apparent that is, When they interview the guilty party, often he has gone over his story so much it has none.
So the true story, with apparent contradictions, needs more details to provide the answers to the apparent contradictions.

famous movie, I think it was bettie crawford being questioned about who this person. Is he your son, yes, she replied. Is he your brother, yes she replied.
They thought she was lying. BUt she started blurting out, he is my son, he is my brother, he is my son, he is my brother. It is my father who raped me to bear this child. So, it was her son, and her brother.
 

DADZ

Banned
May 17, 2021
86
14
8
#67
how do you suggest we change others' lives? what can we use if we do not have an infallible NT?
while I dont think it is infallable, like the so called Lords prayer is different in some texts, I think the errors are minor. But also, some of what is said isnt true. But that doesnt mean the Bible didnt record it accurately.
Exxample, papers report Biden saying he is not a crook.
The papers arent lying, but what Biden said still is.

Hence, some of what the apostles said may not be accurate, in face we know that Paul and the others had some major disagreements.

But what I dont like also, is when people get nit picky about things, like one word in a whole paragraph. Hell, we dont even know if its accurate in its translation. Some things simply CANT be accurately translated from one lang to another. BUt the main part of it isnt in error. The essential part, Jesus dying, rising from the grave, and providing grace and salvation, that is what we r suppose to spread.

Not Paul telling women they should shut up and cover their head in church, errr synagogue?
 

DADZ

Banned
May 17, 2021
86
14
8
#68
If Jesus himself told you that you ought to do something would you argue with him or just do it?
First, I meant to say "ANSWER LAYS" NOT LIES.

IF JESUS HIMSELF TOLD ME TO KILL MY KIDS, CUT MY OWN HEAD OFF AND EAT IT, i WOULD DO MY BEST TO DO IT. BUT IT HAS TO BE DIRECTLY FROM THE FATHER, THE SON, OR THE HOLY SPIRIT.
 

DADZ

Banned
May 17, 2021
86
14
8
#69
Well the stories may not entirely be incompatible, I know it is a stretch [no pun] but he may well have tried to hang himself and failed and falling headlong burst asunder.
I agree. it is a possible contradiction that wouldnt shake my faith one iota, in fact it would strengthen it. But it was also explained to me that he hung himself, and after some time of bloating, he fell and his guts burst out.
I like ur posts
 

2ndTimothyGroup

Well-known member
Feb 20, 2021
5,666
1,912
113
#70
They become ingrained in their thinking. I think it is a result of their personality, a lot of insecurities
I hear you. In my opinion, people simply believe what has been given to them because they do not Truly Fear God. When someone Truly Fears the Lord, they instinctively drop all preconceived notions and seek out the Truth for themselves.

I suggest that all would study what I can to be the "Triangle of Truth" and use these three sets of Scripture as the Backbone of their understandings, study them and know them, and then read the entire Bible in a timeline, chronological order. Doing what I have just suggested will likely result in the beginning of a Romans 12:2 Transformed Life. See the image and link below (to anyone who wants to take their Faith closer to the Truth).

Triangle Of Truth.png

Timeline Chronological Order/Reading Plan
 

DADZ

Banned
May 17, 2021
86
14
8
#71
Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.”
‭‭Hebrews‬ ‭13:8‬ ‭KJV‬‬

you lost me here

“PEOPLE OFTEN LOVE TO QUOTE "JUDGE NOT AND YE SHALL NOT BE JUDGED" AS JESUS TELLING US NOT TO JUDGE. NOT TRUE.”
Jesus follows that with "as you judge, you shall be judged also. So it doesnt mean dont judge, it means dont be a hypocrite. Like if you are going to condemn homosexuality, but are sleeping with women u arent married to, u r a hypocrite. If you are celebate and judge homosexuality, then u arent being a hypocrite.

Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.”
‭‭Matthew‬ ‭24:35‬ ‭

“And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.”
‭‭Matthew‬ ‭28:18-20‬ ‭KJV‬‬
and ALL of Jesus commands were positive ones. He never said things like, thou shalt no murder, or fornicate, or steal. His commands in order of importance were, Love God, Love your neighbor, and spread the good word. OT = negative, thou shalt not,,,NT = positive, thou shalt, Love God, love yur neighbor, spread the good word, help those who need it, (good samaritan), turn the other cheek,

it’s not going to change from Jesus jidgement he is the only way to believe the gospel things like the first example I could t get past in your post sorry I meant to read the whole thing but saw where it was leading
the judgement of Jesus will be whether we believed Him and accepted the Holy Spirit or not. Not about our sins. Our sins have already been forgiven, paid for, all of them, past present and future. Once forgiven, by Gods own definition, it cant be held against you.
And you say the same thing in the following part of your post :

what Jesus said is going to judge us and will Never change we can believe him and repent and be saved or reject what he said and explain it away but then ……
“He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day. For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak.

And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak.”
‭‭John‬ ‭12:48-50‬ ‭KJV‬‬

To accept Christs word is life to learn to forgive others , not condemn sinners like the Pharisees continually did , but to embrace them , love them , forgive them and teach them about repentance and his eternal Kingdom , like Jesus continually did

It’s not a good idea to reject Jesus authority and judgement

“For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad.”
‭‭2 Corinthians‬ ‭5:10‬ ‭

whoa, long post, so you dont mind if I delete some of it? Just letting people know that in my response, Im not including his entire post.
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,278
1,985
113
#72
@Hakawaka re: your Post #48 (about the two thieves)...

Consider the following post:

Post #98,744 - https://christianchat.com/threads/not-by-works.146296/post-3912493
--AND...from other poster's article, in the post immediately above mine there (at link):
[quoting from article] "Thus we see that once again our difficulty in figuring out a “contradiction in Scripture” comes about by assuming that two similar things are the same." ; His article says pretty much what I was trying to explain in brief, in my post. = )
Another example of this ^ ...

Sometimes people tend to equate things they read in scripture which are not speaking of the same identical thing; for example, the following two passages:


Matthew 10:26-27 -
"26 Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known.
27 What I tell you in darkness, that speak ye in light: and what ye hear in the ear, that preach ye upon the housetops."



Luke 12:2-3 -
"2 For there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall not be known.
3 Therefore whatsoever ye have spoken in darkness shall be heard in the light; and that which ye have spoken in the ear in closets shall be proclaimed upon the housetops."


The things being said in each of these passages are distinct.


Purposely so.
 
P

pottersclay

Guest
#73
Follow the bread crumbs....the proof text of the whole bible is the Holy Spirit.
There is homework to be done saints... homework 😜😜😜😜
 

2ndTimothyGroup

Well-known member
Feb 20, 2021
5,666
1,912
113
#74
Follow the bread crumbs....the proof text of the whole bible is the Holy Spirit.
There is homework to be done saints... homework 😜😜😜😜
This is a very interesting statement. Are you able, within a matter of a few sentences, tell us what you mean?
 
Jun 9, 2021
1,871
425
83
#76
Peter had a vision.
Peter begins to live and eat like the Gentiles.
A group of Jews show up sent from James, and suddenly Peter becomes a hypocrite and sins towards his Gentile Brothers/Sisters in Christ.
Paul confronts Peter in Antioch concerning Peter's sin.


Now we know for a fact that Peter is [Saved] through Christ and full of the Holy Spirit.
But we see that Peter commits a sin that caused division between the Gentile Believers and Jewish Believers.
Then Paul [Rebukes] Peter for committing this sin.


I am willing to bet Peter sought forgiveness after Paul pointed out this sin.
Otherwise, why would Paul point out Peter's sin if there was no need to make it right?
Clearly, there was a need to make it Right.
Clearly, Peter sinned and his sin became a public Rebuke by Peter.


I believe had Peter sinned and then asked for forgiveness to those he sinned to, Paul would not had Rebuked him.

The moral of this story by Paul in Galatians is sinning after we've accepted Christ, been filled with the Holy Spirit, is still a sin and we are held accountable for that sin. Therefore, Forgiveness of that sin is necessary!
 

DADZ

Banned
May 17, 2021
86
14
8
#77
Peter had a vision.
Peter begins to live and eat like the Gentiles.
A group of Jews show up sent from James, and suddenly Peter becomes a hypocrite and sins towards his Gentile Brothers/Sisters in Christ.
Paul confronts Peter in Antioch concerning Peter's sin.


Now we know for a fact that Peter is [Saved] through Christ and full of the Holy Spirit.
But we see that Peter commits a sin that caused division between the Gentile Believers and Jewish Believers.
Then Paul [Rebukes] Peter for committing this sin.


I am willing to bet Peter sought forgiveness after Paul pointed out this sin.
Otherwise, why would Paul point out Peter's sin if there was no need to make it right?
Clearly, there was a need to make it Right.
Clearly, Peter sinned and his sin became a public Rebuke by Peter.


I believe had Peter sinned and then asked for forgiveness to those he sinned to, Paul would not had Rebuked him.

The moral of this story by Paul in Galatians is sinning after we've accepted Christ, been filled with the Holy Spirit, is still a sin and we are held accountable for that sin. Therefore, Forgiveness of that sin is necessary!
Peter was wrong about other things, so if he did seek forgiveness, it was wrong. BUT, you are assuming he did. You cant build your theology on something like that.
Your sin is already forgiven is it not?
 

Evmur

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2021
4,963
2,558
113
London
christianchat.com
#79
I find it impossible that the Holy Spirit would guide and teach the Apostles to in fact, guide and teach Gentiles and Jews alike to follow the Law of Moses.

Acts 15:29 NLT - "You must abstain from eating food offered to idols, from consuming blood or the meat of strangled animals, and from sexual immorality. If you do this, you will do well. Farewell."

And then we see the correction in 1 Corinthians:

1 Corinthians 8:10 NLT - "For if others see you--with your "superior knowledge"--eating in the temple of an idol, won't they be encouraged to violate their conscience by eating food that has been offered to an idol?"

The Acts 15 quite cannot possibly be correct, for the idea is corrected in 1 Corinthians.

Hey, I could always be wrong . . . I am always open to that possibility and fact.
Indeed you can dear brother and indeed you are. :)

James says specifically in Acts that these abstentions are "because Moses is read in every place" in other words James was just as careful as Paul was of offending the consciences of those weak in the faith. The abstentions in James' letter are by way of concession not arbitrary
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#80
show me the quotes\
1 John 1: 9 If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

James 5: 16 therefore, Confess your sins to one another, and pray for one another, that you may be healed. The effective, fervent prayer of a righteous man avails much.