I can share my personal perspective on some of the questions/implications risen here...
I can't see why any athiest would come to a Christian chat site if they were not obviously seeking the Lord or looking for answers. I definately can't see any athiest trying to debate with or convert Christians with their beliefs or unbeliefs on a site full of devoted Christians. We just got to show them the love of the LORD and let God do all the work in speaking to their heart
Well, Christians don't all hold the same beliefs, there are lots of controversial issues within the faith and even outside of it with politics and whatnot. People argue about those things on this forum all the time. I have no interest in "converting people to atheism" that would be ridiculous

However, I would like to promote open-mindedness. I'm speaking of issues that have little to do with "does god exist?" and more to do with "how should we treat homosexuals?" or "how should we treat non-believers?" or "should I believe in psychiatry or not?" things like that. Issues that actually have an effect on everyone's lives.
Also, I'm shallow too, I like using the chat rooms for conversation completely irrelevant to anything regarding religion, make friends and whatnot.
I have met 5 self- proclaimed "true" atheists so far (they didn't believe in anything supernatural). Three of them said we humans are gods. That would make it a religion?
I don't know any atheists who claim humans as gods... It sounds like that would be all semantics though. I don't believe in anything supernatural, and most atheists don't. But humans are just humans in my view, beautiful sometimes and ugly other times, but overall I love us
I think he's referring to the rise in "New-Atheism" or "Militant Atheism" that we've seen in the past 20 years. Which has produced people like Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins who devote most of their time to combating religion at every turn. What I call "Old Atheism" is people like my friend and you who just go about their lives, and only mention their Atheism if it comes up in a conversation or you're asked about it.
Hm, well the only thing that seems to have in common with a religion is time dedication. I don't think "new atheism" is a religion still, I certainly wouldn't dedicate my career to such a pursuit (I love where I'm going too much,) but I wouldn't call it a religion. To shed a bit of light on new-atheism vs. old-atheism. I think the new-atheists are more angered at the atrocities inspired by religion, some of which I mentioned earlier, so they see it as worthwhile to do what they do. Personally I think their approach is a bit off, trying to remove someone's religious faith is next to impossible, if someone is going to stop believing, they're going to do it themselves, in fact trying to attack the religious basis for their beliefs just shuts people down, it's counter-intuitive. So I like to be "anti-homophobia/pro-equality", "anti-violence/pro-peace", "anti-theocracy/pro-constitutional democracy", because if I decide to be "anti-god&faith/pro-atheism" I'm going to get nothing done anyways, and there's no need for people to abandon god to be awesome people. So I speak for and argue for those other values, I'm not trying to destroy anyone's faith in god.
BUT I would like the add... "Militant atheism" is some guys who would never encourage violence of any kind, writing books and participating in debates while occasionally being rude. I don't see this as all that bad when "Militant Islam" and "Militant Christianity" have example after example of horrid acts of violence and murder. So even if you consider atheism a religion... It's hard to say it's worse than the others.