KJV translators weren't KJV only!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dino246

Dino246

Senior Member
#121
Jun 30, 2015
25,472
13,785
113
#121
justbyfaith said:
So, you cannot come to the knowledge of the truth through a singular scripture? You have to have two or three in order for that scripture to be valid?
Click to expand...
“So you’re saying…”

Please locate and watch the Jordan Peterson-Cathy Newman interview so that you understand how flawed this line of discussion is. I’m not going to respond further to your corruptions of my statements.
 
J

justbyfaith

Well-known member
#122
Sep 16, 2021
4,707
462
83
#122
Dino246 said:
No matter should be determined on one verse alone. Further, it is not right to decide which translation has the correct wording on the basis of some aftermarket view.
Click to expand...
It seems to me that if that verse really says that Peter stood condemned, that it settles the issue for me that one can lose his salvation.

But if the kjv is correct in its translation of that verse, and he was merely to be blamed, I find that the matter is still undecided.
 
J

justbyfaith

Well-known member
#123
Sep 16, 2021
4,707
462
83
#123
Dino246 said:
“So you’re saying…”

Please locate and watch the Jordan Peterson-Cathy Newman interview so that you understand how flawed this line of discussion is. I’m not going to respond further to your corruptions of my statements.
Click to expand...
Yes, it appears that you are embarrassed by the position that you have set forth as being your opinion.

Provide a link to the interview; and I may look into it.
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#124
Jan 13, 2016
17,130
3,689
113
#124
Dino246 said:
That God’s word is truth is established by far more than that one verse.
Click to expand...
All I need is that one verse to know that God's word is truth. Yes, other verses support that doctrine, but only one verse is needed.

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth...that one verse is all I need for the truth that God created the heaven and the earth. Other verses support this truth, but the doctrine is found in one verse.
 
R

rayzor

Banned
#125
Aug 20, 2021
1,863
310
83
#125
John146 said:
How do we know what the original ten commandments really say, if not for the copy, which is included in scripture?
Click to expand...
Because can tell you
It's the holy spirit the holy spirit is greater then the written word.Its the finger pointing toward heaven,Don't worship the finger.
 
Dino246

Dino246

Senior Member
#127
Jun 30, 2015
25,472
13,785
113
#127
justbyfaith said:
It mentions Easter as a holiday that was celebrated by the early church.

And of course, the doctrine of Easter ties in with the doctrine of the Resurrection; because that is what Easter celebrates.
Click to expand...
All of which is irrelevant, because it assumes the meaning of the word instead of accepting the literal translation.
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#128
Jan 13, 2016
17,130
3,689
113
#128
rayzor said:
Because can tell you
It's the holy spirit the holy spirit is greater then the written word.Its the finger pointing toward heaven,Don't worship the finger.
Click to expand...
Ok, in Luke 10:1, did the Lord send out seventy or seventy two?

What does Matthew 18:11 really say if anything?

In 2 Samuel 21:19, who killed Goliath?
 
Lucy-Pevensie

Lucy-Pevensie

Senior Member
#133
Dec 20, 2017
9,386
5,725
113
#133
justbyfaith said:
How about Galatians 2:11? the kjv translates it that Peter was to be blamed...whereas another translation says that he stood condemned.

That kind of has a bearing on the issue of OSAS vs. you can lose your salvation as a doctrine.
Click to expand...
That's you or whoever has been teaching you, projecting thier ideas into the passage.
The verses read the same.
 
Dino246

Dino246

Senior Member
#134
Jun 30, 2015
25,472
13,785
113
#134
John146 said:
Ok, in Luke 10:1, did the Lord send out seventy or seventy two?

What does Matthew 18:11 really say if anything?

In 2 Samuel 21:19, who killed Goliath?
Click to expand...
How old was Ahaziah when he became king?

I am saddened that you keep on with these canards and do not have the integrity to apply the same set of standards to the KJV that you use for other translations. You are hypocritical.
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#135
Jan 13, 2016
17,130
3,689
113
#135
Dino246 said:
How old was Ahaziah when he became king?

I am saddened that you keep on with these canards and do not have the integrity to apply the same set of standards to the KJV that you use for other translations. You are hypocritical.
Click to expand...
This has been explained many times. Did you come up with this or are you repeating what you found on the internet?
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#136
Jan 13, 2016
17,130
3,689
113
#136
A faithful witness will not lie: but a false witness will utter lies.
 
J

justbyfaith

Well-known member
#137
Sep 16, 2021
4,707
462
83
#137
Dino246 said:
How old was Ahaziah when he became king?

I am saddened that you keep on with these canards and do not have the integrity to apply the same set of standards to the KJV that you use for other translations. You are hypocritical.
Click to expand...
You have three fingers pointing back at you (Matthew 7:1-5, Luke 6:41-42).
 
J

justbyfaith

Well-known member
#138
Sep 16, 2021
4,707
462
83
#138
Lucy-Pevensie said:
That's you or whoever has been teaching you, projecting thier ideas into the passage.
The verses read the same.
Click to expand...
The person who spoke of this was not my teacher. I was actually contending with him for the doctrine of POTS.

But it should be clear that if Peter stood condemned, either he was never saved in the first place (Peter, the apostle?) or else he lost his salvation for a moment; and a person can go in and out of salvation.
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#139
Jan 13, 2016
17,130
3,689
113
#139
Dino246 said:
How old was Ahaziah when he became king?

I am saddened that you keep on with these canards and do not have the integrity to apply the same set of standards to the KJV that you use for other translations. You are hypocritical.
Click to expand...
The simple solution to this apparent contradiction is that Ahaziah was physically 22 years old when he began to reign, but since God has appointed Jehu to cut off the house of Ahab, as a son of Ahab through marriage, he was 42 years old. The information is all there in the texts to the student of the word.
 
J

justbyfaith

Well-known member
#140
Sep 16, 2021
4,707
462
83
#140
Gal 2:11 (kjv), But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed.

Gal 2:11 (ESV), But when Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.