Are you certain of going to heaven when you die ?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Evmur

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2021
5,219
2,618
113
London
christianchat.com
You will never get on the same page.
You are dealing with a hyper pauline.
Only pauls words matter.
He is radical and false.
His doctrine is easily defeated by any babe with a bible because he OMITS and poo poos the parts of the bible that are precious to us.

I sat under that very doctrine.
It is false and heresy.
I know their teachers.
It is despicable and intolerable and has made them legalists big time, like some radical church of christ followers stalking believers and telling them they are not saved.

It is cunning and sick.
yas ...another thing MADianites do for he is a Mid Acts Dispensationalist or MAD is they never respond when they are shown to be wrong, they just bounce along as though it never happened.
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,887
2,112
113
yas ...another thing MADianites do for he is a Mid Acts Dispensationalist or MAD is they never respond when they are shown to be wrong, they just bounce along as though it never happened.
Do we know for a fact that the OP is a "Mid-Acts-dispensationalist" (aka "hyper-dispensationalist" some call this)?
[I personally have not read very many of his posts, to know...]







[If so, then to be clear, "Mid-Acts-dispensational" ('hyper-dispensational') is not the same thing as "Pauline- "..., as I pointed out in my previous post]
 

Evmur

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2021
5,219
2,618
113
London
christianchat.com
Do we know for a fact that the OP is a "Mid-Acts-dispensationalist" (aka "hyper-dispensationalist" some call this)?
[I personally have not read very many of his posts, to know...]







[If so, then to be clear, "Mid-Acts-dispensational" ('hyper-dispensational') is not the same thing as "Pauline- "..., as I pointed out in my previous post]
He doesn't admit to it ...
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,887
2,112
113
He doesn't admit to it ...
Is it possible that his viewpoint is being misrepresented with the [legit] labels "MID-Acts-dispensational [MAD]" / "hyper-dispensational"
(as well as "Abs'" [non-legit, mis-labeled] label, [a supposed] "hyper-Pauline")??


Just asking. Coz I hate it when I see ppl's viewpoints being misrepresented
 

Evmur

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2021
5,219
2,618
113
London
christianchat.com
Is it possible that his viewpoint is being misrepresented with the [legit] labels "MID-Acts-dispensational [MAD]" / "hyper-dispensational"
(as well as "Abs'" [non-legit, mis-labeled] label, [a supposed] "hyper-Pauline")??


Just asking. Coz I hate it when I see ppl's viewpoints being misrepresented
If you see someone with spots they probably have measles.
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,887
2,112
113
If you see someone with spots they probably have measles.
I think this is a good analogy ^ ... to what we are discussing... :D meaning, that Dr. Abs would diagnose anyone believing that "the Church which is His body" began in Acts 2 (Pentecost) as a [mis-labeled] "hyper-[anything]"... but that diagnosis is NOT ACCURATE (not a legit labeling, see).

And this is because Abs himself believes the Church [which is His body] has existed throughout human history since the beginning of time (i.e. from the time of the garden of Eden pretty much), rather than what dispensationalists in general believe, that it came into existence at some point AFTER Christ was "glorified" (and pertains to the permanent INDWELLING of the Holy Spirit, see again John 7:39's "NOT YET's"; and see Eph1:20-23 WHEN [as to its existence]).



This is the actual distinction that is needful of being pointed out (but isn't being, in all the mis-labeling by Abs, and possible misrepresentings...). = )
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
Somehow I missed this post ^ .

I'm not sure if you're maybe mis-labeling something as (being called, by you): "hyper Pauline"

...and I'm not sure what the OP actually believes, as he is unclear (to me) and not really accurately reflecting what I think *you* are labeling "hyper Pauline" (which I believe is really a MIS-labeling)...

...but who actually believe:

--"the Church which is His body" began on Pentecost [see Eph1:20-23 WHEN (as to its existence)]--from what I've seen of your posts, you do not believe this, instead believing it has existed since the garden of Eden...

... and thus that the Holy Spirit (prior to the point when Jesus was glorified), per what Jesus had said in the CONTEXT surrounding what John 7:39 informs us of (re: Him / Holy Spirit) "was NOT YET given; because that Jesus was NOT YET glorified"...

...so that "the Church which is His body" is [uniquely] permanently INDWELT by the Holy Spirit (and "sealed unto the day of redemption" Eph1:13, 4:30)--whereas you do not seem to believe that the Church (which is His body) did not exist in OT times (tho certainly chosen "IN HIM *before [pro]* the foundation of the world, Eph1:4--not the Calvinistic [inaccurate] form of predestination, btw);


--that "grace" surely was found even in OT times ("Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord" Gen6:8, for example);


--that "For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ." John 1:17; IOW, they do not deny this, as you are suggesting of the doctrine you are speaking against, if I'm perceiving your overall stance on this subject correctly, from the lengthy time you've referred to it, and not just here in this thread);


--that, (given all of the above) Paul was given by God to disclose and explain the doctrines specifically to/for/about "the Church which is His body" (related also to what 1Cor2:7,8,10a is saying, esp. v.8b... that is, it was necessary for SOME things to have remained "hidden / secret / undisclosed" PRIOR TO the Cross... for the particular reason mentioned here in v.8b);
see also Col1:25 ("...according to the dispensation of God which is given to me for you, to complete the word of God")

--etc...



I disagree.

Matt25:12 shows Jesus saying to the 5 foolish virgins, "I know you not"

... the next verse (v.14 rather) starts out with "FOR"... (which connects these sections)... where then v.30 states, "And cast the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth." ALL of the "weeping and gnashing of teeth" passages, as well as the "cast into outer darkness" passages are speaking of the SAME THING (same time-slot, same outcome / consequences / etc), and they are NOT referring to that which "SAVED" ppl are subject to...

...it is *your* "partial-rapture" theory that is governing such an idea (which you continue to express in various ways, which touch also on these issues spelled out here, and in this thread)... but is not biblically accurate. = )
The "one taken/left" is framed by Jesus as the rapture.
So is the 10 virgin parable.

Vividly depicted.
Jesus partial rapture " theory";
Mat 24
38 For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark, 39 and they did not [ac]understand until the flood came and took them all away; so will the coming of the Son of Man be. 40 At that time there will be two men in the field; one [ad]will be taken and one [ae]will be left. 41 Two women will be grinding at the [af]mill; one [ag]will be taken and one [ah]will be left.

Be Ready for His Coming
42 “Therefore be on the alert, for you do not know which day your Lord is coming. 43 But [ai]be sure of this, that if the head of the house had known at what time of the night the thief was coming, he would have been on the alert and would not have allowed his house to be broken into. 44 For this reason you must be ready as well; for the Son of Man is coming at an hour when you do not think He will.

Partial rapture big time
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
[to help clarify]... it is "hyper-dispensationalists" who do not believe this ^ (not the "Pauline-", who DO believe this...)






[whereas "Abs" does not believe the Church which is His body started ANYWHERE in Acts, but rather way back at the time of creation, pretty much... having existed throughout human history since the beginning of time]
i have no clue what you are referring to.
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
Somehow I missed this post ^ .

I'm not sure if you're maybe mis-labeling something as (being called, by you): "hyper Pauline"

...and I'm not sure what the OP actually believes, as he is unclear (to me) and not really accurately reflecting what I think *you* are labeling "hyper Pauline" (which I believe is really a MIS-labeling)...

...but who actually believe:

--"the Church which is His body" began on Pentecost [see Eph1:20-23 WHEN (as to its existence)]--from what I've seen of your posts, you do not believe this, instead believing it has existed since the garden of Eden...

... and thus that the Holy Spirit (prior to the point when Jesus was glorified), per what Jesus had said in the CONTEXT surrounding what John 7:39 informs us of (re: Him / Holy Spirit) "was NOT YET given; because that Jesus was NOT YET glorified"...

...so that "the Church which is His body" is [uniquely] permanently INDWELT by the Holy Spirit (and "sealed unto the day of redemption" Eph1:13, 4:30)--whereas you do not seem to believe that the Church (which is His body) did not exist in OT times (tho certainly chosen "IN HIM *before [pro]* the foundation of the world, Eph1:4--not the Calvinistic [inaccurate] form of predestination, btw);


--that "grace" surely was found even in OT times ("Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord" Gen6:8, for example);


--that "For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ." John 1:17; IOW, they do not deny this, as you are suggesting of the doctrine you are speaking against, if I'm perceiving your overall stance on this subject correctly, from the lengthy time you've referred to it, and not just here in this thread);


--that, (given all of the above) Paul was given by God to disclose and explain the doctrines specifically to/for/about "the Church which is His body" (related also to what 1Cor2:7,8,10a is saying, esp. v.8b... that is, it was necessary for SOME things to have remained "hidden / secret / undisclosed" PRIOR TO the Cross... for the particular reason mentioned here in v.8b);
see also Col1:25 ("...according to the dispensation of God which is given to me for you, to complete the word of God")

--etc...



I disagree.

Matt25:12 shows Jesus saying to the 5 foolish virgins, "I know you not"

... the next verse (v.14 rather) starts out with "FOR"... (which connects these sections)... where then v.30 states, "And cast the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth." ALL of the "weeping and gnashing of teeth" passages, as well as the "cast into outer darkness" passages are speaking of the SAME THING (same time-slot, same outcome / consequences / etc), and they are NOT referring to that which "SAVED" ppl are subject to...

...it is *your* "partial-rapture" theory that is governing such an idea (which you continue to express in various ways, which touch also on these issues spelled out here, and in this thread)... but is not biblically accurate. = )
Yes
He spews them out of his mouth.
They are carnal believers walking in sin.
The church is full of them.
Note he tells BELIEVERS; Repent and go buy gold refined in fire to get back into intimacy.
He has remedy for backsliders.

Nowhere are carnal believers cast down without remedy.

It is you pretending all believers whether carnal, backslidden , or on fire for God are treated the same.
Why do you think crowns are given to a few and not all?

The answer is worthy vs unworthy.
Not saved vs unsaved.
( are you not seeing worthy believers that Jesus refers to are saved, as well as those not receiving a reward("unworthy") are just as saved?)

Jesus told believers " pray that you may be counted Worthy to escape the things about to come upon the Earth and stand before the son of God".
He said that to believers. Some believers that are not praying to be counted Worthy are going to be unworthy to escape. Now I don't know if you're thinking about reframing that into a dynamic that would say you don't have to be worthy as long as you're saved you're going to escape the Great Tribulation. But that would definitely be going against the Bible would it not?
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,887
2,112
113
i have no clue what you are referring to.
I believe these things were talked about back in the other threads (threads covering "rapture timing"), so that's where I'm getting what it is I'm referring to, about your views...

but to make it as succinct as possible, here, I'll just let you answer this directly (so as to make clear your viewpoint to the readers in this thread, since we're on this Subject [which you've brought up, by placing a particular label on the OP person])...

Here's the question: When do you (Abs) believe the Church started / came into existence / began (however you want to put it)?
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,887
2,112
113
Yes
He spews them out of his mouth.
They are carnal believers walking in sin.
The church is full of them.
Note he tells BELIEVERS; Repent and go buy gold refined in fire to get back into intimacy.
He has remedy for backsliders.
I've stated before, the seven letters are addressed "to the churchES" (which is not the same thing as saying "the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY" in which there exists ONLY believers);

however, in "the churchES" there exist both believers AND those who come in His name but who are not actually SAVED/true believers / saints / i.e. vitally connected to Christ ...

...and it is the latter of these two who are called "LUKEWARM" (because they are NOT "vitally connected to the SOURCE [Christ, or God by means of Christ]" JUST LIKE the water system of that day were connected to a SOURCE which provided either HOT OR COLD (which from God's perspective, He's saying HE "WOULD" / that is, either of these is His "WILL"--i.e. BOTH of these are a POSITIVE, from God's perspective);

but the "LUKEWARM" is like a disconnected-from-the-source mud-puddle. They are NOT SAVED, and do NOT have a "taste of Christ" coz they are not connected to Him at all (in salvation).

IOW, "Lukewarm CHRISTIAN" is not a biblical phrase / terminology.

Rather, "lukewarm" here speaks of those who are not genuinely saved (but whom He exhorts to buy of Him gold tried in the fire... so they can indeed be saved... [I believe this particular point speaks specifically of the future trib yrs... "tried in the fire"... It's not that they were Christians who were sub-par and thus were to be left behind at the time of the Rapture (of the "ONE BODY" at ONE point in time)])
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
I am 96 years old and doctors tells me that something is wrong they can't fix so they give me no more than six months to be in this world. I don't think there is a chance that scripture isn't absolute truth about what will happen the day I leave here.

God created me and this earth. Some men say they know better, but no man has come at all close to what God created. Man can repair a body, but if the spirit leaves that repaired body does not live. Something in it had to go somewhere.

God is love, for only love could produce humans, oceans, canyons, trees, and such incredible beauty of the world.

This incredible God gave specific instructions about keeping the spirit alive eternally. God tells me it only takes faith in those instructions and I will live, and the entire world I see confirms it.
....and your mind is sound. What a blessing!!!!
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
I believe these things were talked about back in the other threads (threads covering "rapture timing"), so that's where I'm getting what it is I'm referring to, about your views...

but to make it as succinct as possible, here, I'll just let you answer this directly (so as to make clear your viewpoint to the readers in this thread, since we're on this Subject [which you've brought up, by placing a particular label on the OP person])...

Here's the question: When do you (Abs) believe the Church started / came into existence / began (however you want to put it)?
The first saved ones would be the first church.
I see members here batting that back and forth.

I will take a guess and say the disciples.
I know you are looking for the right answer.
What is your take on the matter?
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
I've stated before, the seven letters are addressed "to the churchES" (which is not the same thing as saying "the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY" in which there exists ONLY believers);

however, in "the churchES" there exist both believers AND those who come in His name but who are not actually SAVED/true believers / saints / i.e. vitally connected to Christ ...

...and it is the latter of these two who are called "LUKEWARM" (because they are NOT "vitally connected to the SOURCE [Christ, or God by means of Christ]" JUST LIKE the water system of that day were connected to a SOURCE which provided either HOT OR COLD (which from God's perspective, He's saying HE "WOULD" / that is, either of these is His "WILL"--i.e. BOTH of these are a POSITIVE, from God's perspective);

but the "LUKEWARM" is like a disconnected-from-the-source mud-puddle. They are NOT SAVED, and do NOT have a "taste of Christ" coz they are not connected to Him at all (in salvation).

IOW, "Lukewarm CHRISTIAN" is not a biblical phrase / terminology.

Rather, "lukewarm" here speaks of those who are not genuinely saved (but whom He exhorts to buy of Him gold tried in the fire... so they can indeed be saved... [I believe this particular point speaks specifically of the future trib yrs... "tried in the fire"... It's not that they were Christians who were sub-par and thus were to be left behind at the time of the Rapture (of the "ONE BODY" at ONE point in time)])
You need a better understanding of salvation.
14 And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God;

15 I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot.
Works is what we do as believers.
Once saved it is up to us to apply ourselves= works both good and bad.
If we " sit on our hands" or become self serving " lukewarm" it has bearing on rewards, not salvation.
Salvation is covenant.
Works by believers is from obedience, love, a changed heart, or possibly another source. All working in the believer AFTER SALVATION.
As believers, it is easy to slip into lukewarmness.

The prodigal became COLD. Took his inheritance and left THE FATHER.
Pssssst.....he was WORSE than lukewarm.

He repented and came home to the same father.

Wow you just gave me a revelation. That same ratio ( 50%) is in the parable.
That makes 3 witnesses.3 examples of those belonging to the father as saved covenant people in different worthy vs unworthy dynamics.

Iow
You need in the 10 virgin parable a dynamic of complete sinners having ;
Lamps
Oil
Light
The Holy Spirit
Waiting on Jesus
Sleeping with "hot" believers
And asking for the wise to share oil to relight their lamps.

You think heathens have those dynamics.

In corinthians paul told the believers to greet the adulterer as a brother.

That concept of all christians are never lukewarm is error.
 

EnglishChick

Well-known member
Apr 20, 2021
673
349
63
42
England UK
Obeying implies there is a command to obey as a prerequisite to salvation. Now we’re starting to venture a bit towards a works-based salvation which is an entirely different animal. As you pointed out in your first post, 1 Corinthians 15:2-3 briefly summarizes the gospel of Christ and so does 1 John 5:13. Salvation is based entirely on someone’s faith in Jesus Christ.

Also, I might add, faith is not considered to be a work of self-effort in order to earn salvation.

Faith is sourced from the Word of God:
Romans 10:17
17So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.

Faith is a spiritual gift of the Holy Spirit:
1 Corinthians 12:9
9To another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit;

Salvation is by grace through faith. Graces means someone has favor with God even when they don’t seem like they should deserve it. And this also says faith is not a work that we do.
Ephesians 2:8-9
8For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: 9Not of works, lest any man should boast.

So 2 Thessalonians 1:8-9, regarding those who do not obey the gospel, is about those who know what the gospel is, had a chance to decide to disobey it, and then hardened their hearts and rejected the gift of the Holy Spirit. All of this can happen as quickly as a blink of an eye without people fully realizing the grave mistake they just made.

2 Thess. 1:8-9 is talking about the rank and file unbeliever, though they may be a morally and ethically “good person”, is actually spiritually dead, will not receive eternal life, and will be destroyed in the afterlife per John 3:16.

We obey because we have been saved and His spirit is in us
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
I've stated before, the seven letters are addressed "to the churchES" (which is not the same thing as saying "the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY" in which there exists ONLY believers);

however, in "the churchES" there exist both believers AND those who come in His name but who are not actually SAVED/true believers / saints / i.e. vitally connected to Christ ...

...and it is the latter of these two who are called "LUKEWARM" (because they are NOT "vitally connected to the SOURCE [Christ, or God by means of Christ]" JUST LIKE the water system of that day were connected to a SOURCE which provided either HOT OR COLD (which from God's perspective, He's saying HE "WOULD" / that is, either of these is His "WILL"--i.e. BOTH of these are a POSITIVE, from God's perspective);

but the "LUKEWARM" is like a disconnected-from-the-source mud-puddle. They are NOT SAVED, and do NOT have a "taste of Christ" coz they are not connected to Him at all (in salvation).

IOW, "Lukewarm CHRISTIAN" is not a biblical phrase / terminology.

Rather, "lukewarm" here speaks of those who are not genuinely saved (but whom He exhorts to buy of Him gold tried in the fire... so they can indeed be saved... [I believe this particular point speaks specifically of the future trib yrs... "tried in the fire"... It's not that they were Christians who were sub-par and thus were to be left behind at the time of the Rapture (of the "ONE BODY" at ONE point in time)])
"""Rather, "lukewarm" here speaks of those who are not genuinely saved (but whom He exhorts to buy of Him gold tried in the fire... so they can indeed be saved... [I believe this particular point speaks specifically of the future trib yrs... "tried in the fire"... It's not that they were Christians who were sub-par and thus were to be left behind at the time of the Rapture (of the "ONE BODY" at ONE point in time)])"""

No
It says "To the believers"
You are trying to say that not one person in that church is saved.

In 1 corinthians it says " some are saved as through fire, they are saved but their works are burned up"

Lukewarm are definitely saved.
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
Btw
I am as "Pauline" as the next guy.

Hyperpaulines misrepresent the books not written by paul.
That is their error.