What is childish is the failure to recognize the difference between "Christian Origination" and "Christian Obligation".
It's you OSAS folks that misdirect the debate from obligation to origination every single time, and it's so predictable. EVERYONE knows that a sinner becomes a Christian by grace through faith, not works, gift of God, etc. The debate is "can that Christian walk away from God and be lost?" and when our side presents our case which involves obedience to God's commandments as evidence for if the saint is really a saint or not, more often than not they do as YOU did: shift the debate from obligation to origination.
If OSAS is Biblical, how is it that the "many" whose "agape" grows cold and dead, leaving them unable to endure to the end, and lost....are saints? Posthuman ridiculously suggests that the wicked, such as demon worshipers, drunkards, dope fiends, mass murderers, etc., can partake of "agape" so they aren't saints, but I've shown only the saints can demonstrate "agape" which is keeping the commandments, because the carnal mind can't do that. What say you?
It's you OSAS folks that misdirect the debate from obligation to origination every single time, and it's so predictable. EVERYONE knows that a sinner becomes a Christian by grace through faith, not works, gift of God, etc. The debate is "can that Christian walk away from God and be lost?" and when our side presents our case which involves obedience to God's commandments as evidence for if the saint is really a saint or not, more often than not they do as YOU did: shift the debate from obligation to origination.
If OSAS is Biblical, how is it that the "many" whose "agape" grows cold and dead, leaving them unable to endure to the end, and lost....are saints? Posthuman ridiculously suggests that the wicked, such as demon worshipers, drunkards, dope fiends, mass murderers, etc., can partake of "agape" so they aren't saints, but I've shown only the saints can demonstrate "agape" which is keeping the commandments, because the carnal mind can't do that. What say you?