Alex Jones hearings

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
13,584
9,104
113
Yes wishful thinking meaning I don't believe there's a hell but that doesn't stop me from wishing there was a hell for people like Alex jones.
It's called an analogy. I don't believe Serena Williams is my wife but it doesn't stop me from wishing
Ok. Thank you for your honesty. Although it’s deeply disturbing to hear you no longer consider yourself a Child of God.
 

shittim

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2016
13,805
7,788
113
PennEd-His posts are displaying an increasing level of confusion, we know he has taken the poison jab and operates without the protection, provision, blessing and favor Jesus offers His own.
His frequent accusation of everyone else being a troll appears as the projecting out by the lost we see so often in these last days.
best wishes
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,688
1,103
113
PennEd-His posts are displaying an increasing level of confusion, we know he has taken the poison jab and operates without the protection, provision, blessing and favor Jesus offers His own.
His frequent accusation of everyone else being a troll appears as the projecting out by the lost we see so often in these last days.
best wishes
Yeah because when you keep saying... Yeah but what about vaccines.,.. when we're not talking about vaccines and has nothing to do with the topic we're talking about, that's the definition of trolling.
 

Temple-C

Junior Member
Apr 5, 2011
120
9
18
47
I started watching Alex's cable access show in the 90s. He said a lot of interesting things and off the wall things but one thing remain consistent throughout the years he always said that both political parties were corrupt. And it didn't matter if a loan person with good intentions became president because then they would become corrupt.

Trump started calling into his show and started to drop hints that he would run for president. When Alex backed Trump I stopped listening to him because he turned his back on his main core message that both parties were corrupt and even a good man would become corrupt if he got into office. He turned himself into a hypocrite and a liar then and there.
 
Sep 15, 2019
9,991
5,546
113
I started watching Alex's cable access show in the 90s. He said a lot of interesting things and off the wall things but one thing remain consistent throughout the years he always said that both political parties were corrupt. And it didn't matter if a loan person with good intentions became president because then they would become corrupt.

Trump started calling into his show and started to drop hints that he would run for president. When Alex backed Trump I stopped listening to him because he turned his back on his main core message that both parties were corrupt and even a good man would become corrupt if he got into office. He turned himself into a hypocrite and a liar then and there.
Trump has been instrumental in the ousting of corrupt RINOs. I do think he's ultimately controlled to look like a saviour-figure, but don't think he can be faulted for not ousting the traitors on both sides.
 

Temple-C

Junior Member
Apr 5, 2011
120
9
18
47
Trump has been instrumental in the ousting of corrupt RINOs. I do think he's ultimately controlled to look like a saviour-figure, but don't think he can be faulted for not ousting the traitors on both sides.
I'm just saying it's crystal clear to Alex's long time followers that he turned his back on his core message once he backed a political candidate.

I believe that there is no difference between both parties. The corporations are orchestrating a culture War in order to keep us from fighting a class.
 
Sep 15, 2019
9,991
5,546
113
I'm just saying it's crystal clear to Alex's long time followers that he turned his back on his core message once he backed a political candidate.
Unless Alex had other intel that Trump wasn't backing either party - and he doesn't seem to be. Sure, he picked a side, but he's routed out quite a number of the RINOs, in addition to destroying a lot of the corrupt Democrats. That would make Alex true to his principles, even though he changed his methodology. At a deeper level, I'd say Alex is another actor/pawn also.

I believe that there is no difference between both parties. The corporations are orchestrating a culture War in order to keep us from fighting a class.
Yes. Actors on both sides. Two sides of the same coin. I think Trump is supposed to be different, to get people to trust government again, but I'm not convinced that this part isn't also a show.
 

HealthAndHappiness

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2022
10,288
4,333
113
Almost Heaven West Virginia
I'm no fan of Alex Jones. He sounds like a nut most of the time. I havent followed the case but it's possible that this is an attack on free speech which we Christians want to preserve. How long before we are in court for condemning sin?
He stood for free speech and was the first banned from YouTube and censored by Google.
He asked for help from a man that he gave millions of dollars of campaign advertising to. DJT....
He warned him that if he would not use his position to lawfully do something about free speech that he would be next.
Look what happened.
Next the election was stolen and speech is censored like communist Russia in the good ol USA.
I don't like some of his views either or his method of presentation at times; but he's fought for the first amendment more than a truckload of forums and city of churches put together.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,688
1,103
113
He stood for free speech and was the first banned from YouTube and censored by Google.
He asked for help from a man that he gave millions of dollars of campaign advertising to. DJT....
He warned him that if he would not use his position to lawfully do something about free speech that he would be next.
Look what happened.
Next the election was stolen and speech is censored like communist Russia in the good ol USA.
I don't like some of his views either or his method of presentation at times; but he's fought for the first amendment more than a truckload of forums and city of churches put together.
Yeah, we've already been over this. Free speech doesn't cover slander and defamation
 
Sep 15, 2019
9,991
5,546
113
It's not true. The shooting happened. They're not actors
I don't believe the truth of the matter was considered in the court case. It was presumed true. Unlike the defamation show-trial of Amber Heard.
 

Temple-C

Junior Member
Apr 5, 2011
120
9
18
47
I don't believe the truth of the matter was considered in the court case. It was presumed true. Unlike the defamation show-trial of Amber Heard.
The problem with that defense is that Alex has already said multiple times in court that he believes the official story about Sandy Hook.

But they didn't even get that far. Alex lost the case because He refused to hand over documents He was ordered to hand over to the court over a year ago.

It was a default judgment because he was defying the orders of the Court.

The video where the judge and the attorney confronts him about the text message was so damaging because those text messages were among some of the documents that we're ordered to be handed over.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,688
1,103
113
I don't believe the truth of the matter was considered in the court case. It was presumed true. Unlike the defamation show-trial of Amber Heard.
Well if you still think the shooting didn't happen then you are completely disconnected from reality and I don't see how we're going to have any proof or conversation moving forward.
Just go there and talk to the locals.
Unless you think an entire town is in on the lie.
Ever heard of Occam's razor?
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,688
1,103
113
I don't believe the truth of the matter was considered in the court case. It was presumed true. Unlike the defamation show-trial of Amber Heard.
Also as I've already said about 57 billion times on this thread. Jones lost by default because he thought he was above the law and didn't have to comply with the discovery process of the trial.
 
Sep 15, 2019
9,991
5,546
113
The problem with that defense is that Alex has already said multiple times in court that he believes the official story about Sandy Hook.
This is the bit that makes me think Alex is a shill, or this is part of some greater scheme. He basically proved the shooting was a hoax (using evidence a lot of others had already gathered), then suddenly admits he was wrong in court? Something is amiss.

But they didn't even get that far. Alex lost the case because He refused to hand over documents He was ordered to hand over to the court over a year ago.

It was a default judgment because he was defying the orders of the Court.

The video where the judge and the attorney confronts him about the text message was so damaging because those text messages were among some of the documents that we're ordered to be handed over.
Thanks for this information. I wasn't aware of this.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,688
1,103
113
This is the bit that makes me think Alex is a shill, or this is part of some greater scheme. He basically proved the shooting was a hoax (using evidence a lot of others had already gathered), then suddenly admits he was wrong in court? Something is amiss.

Thanks for this information. I wasn't aware of this.
No he did not prove the shooting was a hoax.
 
Sep 15, 2019
9,991
5,546
113
No he did not prove the shooting was a hoax.
Didn't you already say "Well if you still think the shooting didn't happen then you are completely disconnected from reality and I don't see how we're going to have any proof or conversation moving forward"?

You already know I think the shooting probably didn't happen, or at least, not the way the authorities said. For further clarification, I certainly don't believe a legitimate father would be laughing away on the day his daughter got murdered by such a shooting, only to put on a sad face the second he realises he's on camera.