All I know is if Puerto Rico decided they would join an alliance with Russia and put Nuclear missile bases in that island, which is 1,000 miles from the US I would have a problem with it, so obviously putting NATO missiles in Ukraine which is 0 miles from Russia should be viewed as a provocative action.
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
1) 10% for the "big guy" from the Ukraine weaponizing cash flows. Gigantic sums.
2) unlimited cocaine supply and vast monthly bribes to Z for continued compliance. Estimates are Z has hundreds of millions grifted away by now.
All paid for by idiotic US and EU taxpayers.
And that's the game folks. Not complicated. $$$Works the same everywhere$$$.
The useful idiots do their part and idolize the belligerent leaders/actors and die for a cause that is a phantasm and lie.
All this while Satan laughs.
2) unlimited cocaine supply and vast monthly bribes to Z for continued compliance. Estimates are Z has hundreds of millions grifted away by now.
All paid for by idiotic US and EU taxpayers.
And that's the game folks. Not complicated. $$$Works the same everywhere$$$.
The useful idiots do their part and idolize the belligerent leaders/actors and die for a cause that is a phantasm and lie.
All this while Satan laughs.
-
1
- Show all
Cv5, you mean like the Budapest Memorandum where the UK and the US convinced Ukraine to give up its Nuclear Missiles - to Russsia!?! - in exchange for Russia's Promise not to attack or threaten Ukraine. Yeah, that lies in the dust now.
Source: "The memoranda, signed in Patria Hall at the Budapest Convention Center with US Ambassador Donald M. Blinken amongst others in attendance,[2] prohibited the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States from threatening or using military force or economic coercion against Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan, "except in self-defence or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations." As a result of other agreements and the memorandum, between 1993 and 1996, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons ...
According to the three memoranda,[5] Russia, the US and the UK confirmed their recognition of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine becoming parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and effectively abandoning their nuclear arsenal to Russia and that they agreed to the following:
If Ukraine had been accepted into NATO in 2008, Putin would most probably not have attacked it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine–NATO_relations#Bucharest_summit:_2008–2009 He's not foolish enough to attack a NATO country. And NATO is a defensive alliance only. Article 5 is not about attacking any other country, but only taking an attack on one as an attack on all. Also NATO did not accept Ukraine precisely because they thought Putin may give that as an excuse to invade. But now their very non-acceptance led to his invasion. Moreover, when Finland and Sweden saw Putin's aggression, they applied to join NATO. So if Putin considered Ukraine a threat, when it wasn't even close to joining NATO, why not Finland and Sweden? The Truth is Putin respects strength and won't commit further aggressions if he knows he will lose. That's why he's not attacking Finland or Sweden. Against Ukraine, he thought he'll win easily, but yeah, that didn't happen.
Here is the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense estimates of number of troops Russia has lost in its unjust invasion. 65000.
For context, Russia lost nearly 15,000 soldiers in its 10 year War with Afghanistan. America lost some 2500 in 20 years.
Wiki: "Over 15,000 Soviet troops were killed in Afghanistan from 1979 until 1989." That was across 10 years here.
Wiki: "There were 2,456 United States military deaths in the War in Afghanistan." This is 65,000 in some 8 months.
Source: "The memoranda, signed in Patria Hall at the Budapest Convention Center with US Ambassador Donald M. Blinken amongst others in attendance,[2] prohibited the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States from threatening or using military force or economic coercion against Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan, "except in self-defence or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations." As a result of other agreements and the memorandum, between 1993 and 1996, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons ...
According to the three memoranda,[5] Russia, the US and the UK confirmed their recognition of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine becoming parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and effectively abandoning their nuclear arsenal to Russia and that they agreed to the following:
- Respect the signatory's independence and sovereignty in the existing borders.[6]
- Refrain from the threat or the use of force against the signatory"[3][4]
If Ukraine had been accepted into NATO in 2008, Putin would most probably not have attacked it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine–NATO_relations#Bucharest_summit:_2008–2009 He's not foolish enough to attack a NATO country. And NATO is a defensive alliance only. Article 5 is not about attacking any other country, but only taking an attack on one as an attack on all. Also NATO did not accept Ukraine precisely because they thought Putin may give that as an excuse to invade. But now their very non-acceptance led to his invasion. Moreover, when Finland and Sweden saw Putin's aggression, they applied to join NATO. So if Putin considered Ukraine a threat, when it wasn't even close to joining NATO, why not Finland and Sweden? The Truth is Putin respects strength and won't commit further aggressions if he knows he will lose. That's why he's not attacking Finland or Sweden. Against Ukraine, he thought he'll win easily, but yeah, that didn't happen.
Here is the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense estimates of number of troops Russia has lost in its unjust invasion. 65000.
For context, Russia lost nearly 15,000 soldiers in its 10 year War with Afghanistan. America lost some 2500 in 20 years.
Wiki: "Over 15,000 Soviet troops were killed in Afghanistan from 1979 until 1989." That was across 10 years here.
Wiki: "There were 2,456 United States military deaths in the War in Afghanistan." This is 65,000 in some 8 months.
Cv5, you mean like the Budapest Memorandum where the UK and the US convinced Ukraine to give up its Nuclear Missiles - to Russsia!?! - in exchange for Russia's Promise not to attack or threaten Ukraine. Yeah, that lies in the dust now.
Source: "The memoranda, signed in Patria Hall at the Budapest Convention Center with US Ambassador Donald M. Blinken amongst others in attendance,[2] prohibited the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States from threatening or using military force or economic coercion against Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan, "except in self-defence or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations." As a result of other agreements and the memorandum, between 1993 and 1996, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons ...
According to the three memoranda,[5] Russia, the US and the UK confirmed their recognition of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine becoming parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and effectively abandoning their nuclear arsenal to Russia and that they agreed to the following:
If Ukraine had been accepted into NATO in 2008, Putin would most probably not have attacked it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine–NATO_relations#Bucharest_summit:_2008–2009 He's not foolish enough to attack a NATO country. And NATO is a defensive alliance only. Article 5 is not about attacking any other country, but only taking an attack on one as an attack on all. Also NATO did not accept Ukraine precisely because they thought Putin may give that as an excuse to invade. But now their very non-acceptance led to his invasion. Moreover, when Finland and Sweden saw Putin's aggression, they applied to join NATO. So if Putin considered Ukraine a threat, when it wasn't even close to joining NATO, why not Finland and Sweden? The Truth is Putin respects strength and won't commit further aggressions if he knows he will lose. That's why he's not attacking Finland or Sweden. Against Ukraine, he thought he'll win easily, but yeah, that didn't happen.
Here is the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense estimates of number of troops Russia has lost in its unjust invasion. 65000.
For context, Russia lost nearly 15,000 soldiers in its 10 year War with Afghanistan. America lost some 2500 in 20 years.
Wiki: "Over 15,000 Soviet troops were killed in Afghanistan from 1979 until 1989." That was across 10 years here.
Wiki: "There were 2,456 United States military deaths in the War in Afghanistan." This is 65,000 in some 8 months.
Source: "The memoranda, signed in Patria Hall at the Budapest Convention Center with US Ambassador Donald M. Blinken amongst others in attendance,[2] prohibited the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States from threatening or using military force or economic coercion against Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan, "except in self-defence or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations." As a result of other agreements and the memorandum, between 1993 and 1996, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons ...
According to the three memoranda,[5] Russia, the US and the UK confirmed their recognition of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine becoming parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and effectively abandoning their nuclear arsenal to Russia and that they agreed to the following:
- Respect the signatory's independence and sovereignty in the existing borders.[6]
- Refrain from the threat or the use of force against the signatory"[3][4]
If Ukraine had been accepted into NATO in 2008, Putin would most probably not have attacked it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine–NATO_relations#Bucharest_summit:_2008–2009 He's not foolish enough to attack a NATO country. And NATO is a defensive alliance only. Article 5 is not about attacking any other country, but only taking an attack on one as an attack on all. Also NATO did not accept Ukraine precisely because they thought Putin may give that as an excuse to invade. But now their very non-acceptance led to his invasion. Moreover, when Finland and Sweden saw Putin's aggression, they applied to join NATO. So if Putin considered Ukraine a threat, when it wasn't even close to joining NATO, why not Finland and Sweden? The Truth is Putin respects strength and won't commit further aggressions if he knows he will lose. That's why he's not attacking Finland or Sweden. Against Ukraine, he thought he'll win easily, but yeah, that didn't happen.
Here is the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense estimates of number of troops Russia has lost in its unjust invasion. 65000.
For context, Russia lost nearly 15,000 soldiers in its 10 year War with Afghanistan. America lost some 2500 in 20 years.
Wiki: "Over 15,000 Soviet troops were killed in Afghanistan from 1979 until 1989." That was across 10 years here.
Wiki: "There were 2,456 United States military deaths in the War in Afghanistan." This is 65,000 in some 8 months.
LOL. Friend.....I know basically every treaty, every promise, every negotiation that was brokered since 1990 and before.
Believe me.....Putin's hand was forced. Stuffing NATO and their military into Ukraine was the last straw. Everyone knows this.
Everyone knows the 2014 coup was the turning point, and how this happened immediately after negotiations broke down....AGAIN.
BTW......the vast majority of Eastern Ukrainians are Russian by BLOOD AND LANGUAGE. THEY ARE RUSSIAN for pity's sake.
Only about 20-25% of western Ukraine are actually Ukrainian.....with plenty of old-shool Nazi actors and sympathies to boot.
Believe me.....Putin's hand was forced. Stuffing NATO and their military into Ukraine was the last straw. Everyone knows this.
Everyone knows the 2014 coup was the turning point, and how this happened immediately after negotiations broke down....AGAIN.
BTW......the vast majority of Eastern Ukrainians are Russian by BLOOD AND LANGUAGE. THEY ARE RUSSIAN for pity's sake.
Only about 20-25% of western Ukraine are actually Ukrainian.....with plenty of old-shool Nazi actors and sympathies to boot.
-
1
- Show all
Yes, nuclear war does have a downside, but there is also an upside.
The US and all these other countries have very extensive underground bunkers that are well stocked, so they can ride our a nuclear war. Everyone that counts has a ticket and a bed set aside for them.
But after a war is over you can "build back better". Right now socialism has spread across the world like a cancer, so every person that dies helps solve so many issues. Social Security can be solvent again. This is one way to eliminate our 31 trillion debt.
You also eliminate all those lawsuits and criminal trials for fraud, corruption, and mass murder from the Pandemic. This war is just like the purge. After the night is over anyone who survives the bombs, the cancer and the collapse of society will be happy to embrace a fascist regime with law and order.
The Lord said His Spirit would not strive with man forever because man is flesh. Everyone wants their opinion, so much so that they don't want God's opinion, don't want the Bible, don't want evangelicals. Well, the day will come when the restrainer will step aside and they will get the civilization they deserve.
The US and all these other countries have very extensive underground bunkers that are well stocked, so they can ride our a nuclear war. Everyone that counts has a ticket and a bed set aside for them.
But after a war is over you can "build back better". Right now socialism has spread across the world like a cancer, so every person that dies helps solve so many issues. Social Security can be solvent again. This is one way to eliminate our 31 trillion debt.
You also eliminate all those lawsuits and criminal trials for fraud, corruption, and mass murder from the Pandemic. This war is just like the purge. After the night is over anyone who survives the bombs, the cancer and the collapse of society will be happy to embrace a fascist regime with law and order.
The Lord said His Spirit would not strive with man forever because man is flesh. Everyone wants their opinion, so much so that they don't want God's opinion, don't want the Bible, don't want evangelicals. Well, the day will come when the restrainer will step aside and they will get the civilization they deserve.
-
1
- Show all
Prez. Zelensky on Twitter on the Morning of Feb. 24: "Russia treacherously attacked our state in the morning, as Nazi Germany did in #2WW years,” he wrote. “As of today, our countries are on different sides of world history. [Russia] has embarked on a path of evil, but [Ukraine] is defending itself & won’t give up its freedom no matter what Moscow thinks.”
Also, the US offered Zelensky a route out of his country and out of personal danger. But he said no, he was going to stay and fight, and suffer with his people. He could have saved himself the trouble if he wanted to. But he didn't. Mark of a leader who cares for his people. He said: "I need ammo, not a ride". He intended to stay and defend his country, and he did.
If Ukraine stops fighting, there will no Ukraine. If Russia stops fighting, the War ends. The onus is on Russia to retreat.
I do not agree with those who take an excessively pessimistic view of eschatology and believe nuclear war is inevitable. When the people of Nineveh repented at Jonah's preaching, God relented of the punishment He had said He would bring on them, if they did not repent. This is a standard Biblical principle and explained in Jer 18:7-10: "7 If at any time I announce that a nation or kingdom is to be uprooted, torn down and destroyed, 8 and if that nation I warned repents of its evil, then I will relent and not inflict on it the disaster I had planned. 9 And if at another time I announce that a nation or kingdom is to be built up and planted, 10 and if it does evil in my sight and does not obey me, then I will reconsider the good I had intended to do for it." So I do not believe Nuclear War is unavoidable. It depends on how much repentance is done.
Also, some men and women of God have prophesied of a last end times "Billion Soul Harvest" before Anti-Christ comes. I think Satan is trying to prevent that, by stirring up nuclear wars etc. If the war happens, then the Anti-Christ will probably show up after that with a "solution". But God's Will imo is for the Billion Soul Harvest and thus not for the Nuclear War that would kill, not save, 100s of Millions or Billions.
"'A Billion-Soul Harvest': The End Times Ushering in History's Greatest Revival?
Christian ministries have been called streams of God. A number of them are coming together because they believe their unity could help set off history's greatest revival."
https://www1.cbn.com/content/billion-soul-harvest-end-times-ushering-historys-greatest-revival [Video in the link].
God Bless.
Also, the US offered Zelensky a route out of his country and out of personal danger. But he said no, he was going to stay and fight, and suffer with his people. He could have saved himself the trouble if he wanted to. But he didn't. Mark of a leader who cares for his people. He said: "I need ammo, not a ride". He intended to stay and defend his country, and he did.
If Ukraine stops fighting, there will no Ukraine. If Russia stops fighting, the War ends. The onus is on Russia to retreat.
I do not agree with those who take an excessively pessimistic view of eschatology and believe nuclear war is inevitable. When the people of Nineveh repented at Jonah's preaching, God relented of the punishment He had said He would bring on them, if they did not repent. This is a standard Biblical principle and explained in Jer 18:7-10: "7 If at any time I announce that a nation or kingdom is to be uprooted, torn down and destroyed, 8 and if that nation I warned repents of its evil, then I will relent and not inflict on it the disaster I had planned. 9 And if at another time I announce that a nation or kingdom is to be built up and planted, 10 and if it does evil in my sight and does not obey me, then I will reconsider the good I had intended to do for it." So I do not believe Nuclear War is unavoidable. It depends on how much repentance is done.
Also, some men and women of God have prophesied of a last end times "Billion Soul Harvest" before Anti-Christ comes. I think Satan is trying to prevent that, by stirring up nuclear wars etc. If the war happens, then the Anti-Christ will probably show up after that with a "solution". But God's Will imo is for the Billion Soul Harvest and thus not for the Nuclear War that would kill, not save, 100s of Millions or Billions.
"'A Billion-Soul Harvest': The End Times Ushering in History's Greatest Revival?
Christian ministries have been called streams of God. A number of them are coming together because they believe their unity could help set off history's greatest revival."
https://www1.cbn.com/content/billion-soul-harvest-end-times-ushering-historys-greatest-revival [Video in the link].
God Bless.
Ukraine is not a US ally, making Ukraine a member of NATO violates previous agreements we have with Russia, and this war in the Ukraine is not a matter of US national interest.
If Germany and France decide to take the lead in the response as a member of NATO the US can support them. But that is it. In my opinion Biden should be impeached for sending tens of billions of dollars of military equipment to Ukraine. It is Congress that declares war, not the president. The idea that he will get us into WW3 without Congress voting is impeachable offense.
If Germany and France decide to take the lead in the response as a member of NATO the US can support them. But that is it. In my opinion Biden should be impeached for sending tens of billions of dollars of military equipment to Ukraine. It is Congress that declares war, not the president. The idea that he will get us into WW3 without Congress voting is impeachable offense.
Why oh why is Julian Assange hounded by endless spook agencies and in prison? Well....this is ultimately why IMO.
WikiLeaks on Twitter: "Julian Assange speaking in 2011: "The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the US and Europe through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational security elite. The goal is an endless war, not a successful war" #Afghanistan https://t.co/Hg3qVzABBg" / Twitter
WikiLeaks on Twitter: "Julian Assange speaking in 2011: "The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the US and Europe through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational security elite. The goal is an endless war, not a successful war" #Afghanistan https://t.co/Hg3qVzABBg" / Twitter
-
2
- Show all
P
SUSPICIOUS PHOTO ......WHO is FUTURISM
Elon Musk Warns "Civilization Is Over" If Ukraine Doesn't Give in to Russia
Noor Al-Sibai - 3h ag
Newly-minted political expert Elon Musk has issued a stark warning to Ukraine as Russia's invasion of the former Eastern Bloc country continues. © Provided by Futurism
Nuclear Meltdown
Self-proclaimed political expert Elon Musk has issued a stark warning to Ukraine as Russia's invasion continues.
Using Twitter, the platform he is likely to soon own and control, the world's richest man made a number of eyebrow-raising predictions for eventualities regarding the outcome of Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
"If Russia is faced with the choice of losing Crimea or using battlefield nukes, they will choose the latter," the SpaceX and Tesla CEO tweeted. "[The West has] already sanctioned/cutoff Russia in every possible way, so what more do they have left to lose?"
"If we nuke Russia back, they will nuke us and then we have WW3," he added.
In short, Musk is arguing that Ukraine should give in to Russia's demands, or else — a highly controversial perspective that has already landed him in hot water recently.
Last week, he announced SpaceX will no longer supply Starlink internet satellite tech to Ukraine, a decision he reversed two days later.
Elon Musk Warns "Civilization Is Over" If Ukraine Doesn't Give in to Russia
Noor Al-Sibai - 3h ag
Newly-minted political expert Elon Musk has issued a stark warning to Ukraine as Russia's invasion of the former Eastern Bloc country continues. © Provided by Futurism
Nuclear Meltdown
Self-proclaimed political expert Elon Musk has issued a stark warning to Ukraine as Russia's invasion continues.
Using Twitter, the platform he is likely to soon own and control, the world's richest man made a number of eyebrow-raising predictions for eventualities regarding the outcome of Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
"If Russia is faced with the choice of losing Crimea or using battlefield nukes, they will choose the latter," the SpaceX and Tesla CEO tweeted. "[The West has] already sanctioned/cutoff Russia in every possible way, so what more do they have left to lose?"
"If we nuke Russia back, they will nuke us and then we have WW3," he added.
In short, Musk is arguing that Ukraine should give in to Russia's demands, or else — a highly controversial perspective that has already landed him in hot water recently.
Last week, he announced SpaceX will no longer supply Starlink internet satellite tech to Ukraine, a decision he reversed two days later.