J
Agreed. The question would be, is it wrong?Love does no wrong to a neighbor; therefore love is the fulfillment of the law. (Romans 13:10 NASB)
So the ends justifies the means?It depends...if for example the only way to find out where someone was hidden and possibly dying was to torture the kidnapper than go for it. If people have moral qualms about it, call me, i dont.
If torture could reveal the location of a hidden nuclear bomb that a terrorist was hiding, would you forbid torturing a Muslim terrorist, and risk the lives of thousands or millions of innocent human beings in New York City or other places where a Muslim terrorist might try to detonate a nuclear device? Would you try to be nice and kind to a Muslim terrorist who is intent on murdering millions of innocent Americans (Russians, Israelis, Italians, etc.)?Should Christians ever condone, or act out torture on other humans? Scripture would be great.
Lord, grant that I am NEVER placed in a position where my opinion on this matters.
If torture could reveal the location of a hidden nuclear bomb that a terrorist was hiding, would you forbid torturing a Muslim terrorist, and risk the lives of thousands or millions of innocent human beings in New York City or other places where a Muslim terrorist might try to detonate a nuclear device? Would you try to be nice and kind to a Muslim terrorist who is intent on murdering millions of innocent Americans (Russians, Israelis, Italians, etc.)?
Is torture absolute forbidden under all circumstances? Do not human lives matter?
Is the right of the terrorist not to suffer torture more important than the rights of millions of American citizens not to be killed in a nuclear explosion?
Scripture neither forbids nor commands torture. Common sense says we should not try to protect a terrorist who is going to explode a nuclear bomb and not torture him because his feelings might be hurt. Short of killing him, torture is in this circumstance totally justified.
If torture could reveal the location of a hidden nuclear bomb that a terrorist was hiding, would you forbid torturing a Muslim terrorist, and risk the lives of thousands or millions of innocent human beings in New York City or other places where a Muslim terrorist might try to detonate a nuclear device? Would you try to be nice and kind to a Muslim terrorist who is intent on murdering millions of innocent Americans (Russians, Israelis, Italians, etc.)?
Is torture absolute forbidden under all circumstances? Do not human lives matter?
Is the right of the terrorist not to suffer torture more important than the rights of millions of American citizens not to be killed in a nuclear explosion?
Scripture neither forbids nor commands torture. Common sense says we should not try to protect a terrorist who is going to explode a nuclear bomb and not torture him because his feelings might be hurt. Short of killing him, torture is in this circumstance totally justified.
Stop what? I'm not doing or saying anything wrong.torturing a Muslim terrorist
innocent human beings in New York City
other places where a Muslim terrorist
detonate a nuclear device
Would you try to be nice and kind to a Muslim terrorist
who is intent on murdering millions of innocent Americans (Russians, Israelis, Italians, etc.)?
Common sense
not try to protect a terrorist
torture him
torture is in this circumstance totally justified.
~
how can anyone believe this?
muslims didn't do 9-11.
arabs are being dehumanized and demonized.
if we don't care about them why should anyone care about you?
the torture chamber is FOR YOU. dont you get it?
STOP IT.
First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left to speak out for me.
The people who did 9/11 were Muslims who did their bad works in the name of Islam.
no they were not.
your own government did 9-11 so they could clamp you in irons with your permission through THE PATRIOT ACT.
wake up.
and look how you are giving your approval to torture...right on schedule.
didn't you read 1984 in school or had that already gone down the memory hole?
It is part of our national defense if the CIA or military uses torture techniques to obtain information that could save lives. No one is actually killed.
Torture is not wrong. Not obtaining information is wrong. If a Islamic terrorist or other terrorist who comes in the name of another religion, whatever religion, even of Christianity or whatever, it is not wrong to torture that individual if their intention is to use nuclear weapons.
It may not actually happen. But if it ever does, and they didn't use torture, and the bomb went off, we would always wonder whether we really should have used force and coercive interrogations to obtain information to prevent an atomic explosion.
For the record, people in The USA believe that 9/11 was Muslim Extremist. It matters alot. I don't think anyone seriously believes that our government did that. It's not good for you to just sit there and speculate that all those people died because of our government. By the way, they got Osama Bin Laden! And people here really believe he was behind the terror attack. That kind of belief is not popular in the USA. If our government wanted something they would vote in the House and Senate.