It is an exception. Shameful you cannot acknowledge that Jesus is righteous and worthy.
Ouch. What is with the nasty comment and false accusation? That is a disgusting thing to say to someone. Are you capable of having a debate without hurling insults?
As I said it is neither. Your question has two false choices in it and is therefore, illogical.
Your argument is that "Jesus is an exception to the Rule that none are worthy".
What 'rule' are we talking about here?
Let us review your quote...
There are none worthy/righteous. Jesus is worthy/righteous. Is that a contradiction? Or an exception?
Now, let us review the actual verse in CONTEXT...
Romans 3:9-10
"What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin; As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one"
The verse you are referencing has to do with those that are
already sinners. Thus, the 'rule' in your quote is about how it is proven that no SINNER is righteous. I obviously agree with that.
Jesus is not a sinner. Jesus never broke the Law. Your question is forcing me to choose that he is. Basically, what you are teaching is that Jesus broke the Law, but he is an "exception to the rule" and can get away with it while everyone else cannot. You are arguing *in favor of* contradiction.
Therefore, given the context of the verse you referenced in your 'multiple choice quiz', I disagree with your two false choices. The answer is neither.