Majority Standard BibleEveryone should note that it is only in the King James Bible that this verse has been accurately presented by showing us that it was GOD (THEOS) who took human form ("manifested in the flesh") as Jesus of Nazareth. All other modern translations have expunged "God" from that verse and substituted another word. Originally a Unitarian was behind this change, or at least made sure that "God" was removed. And this in spite of the fact that all Greek manuscripts have THEOS (abbreviated in the majuscules) (other than two very corrupt manuscripts). Once again this is why Christians should stick with the KJB.
Well since you have made that accusation, let's see if it has any validity. You have not even considered the reason why, nor have you looked at the Hebrew.Read numbers 14:34; the KJV translation is so bad it actually says God breaks his promises.
None of those bibles is in common use! So let's look at the ones in common use and see that what I posted was in fact correct and they all say "He" (or one says "Christ) which is not even in the Greek and could even mean Michael the archangel:
You did not specify "common use" so what you said was in fact not correct.None of those bibles is in common use! So let's look at the ones in common use and see that what I posted was in fact correct and they all say "He" (or one says "Christ) which is not even in the Greek and could even mean Michael the archangel:
That was a given so why state the obvious?You did not specify "common use" so what you said was in fact not correct.
It was not a given. You said "All other modern translations." Only one would prove you wrong.That was a given so why state the obvious?
Romans 9:5
John 1:1-3
Zechariah 11:13
Zechariah 12:10
John 20:28
Revelation 22:13
And so many more; I have a list on my old phone but it is dead right now; if I manage to revive it I will post it. Then again you did not ask for exhaustive list of every verses attesting of Jesus divinity but personal favourites. So I must say I do particularly like the Zechariah 11 and 12 ones as they combine showing Jesus is God and also are some of the clearest prophecies about him.
Thanks why does the Modern KJV not have the 7 OT books and chapters of Esther and Daniel?Everyone should note that it is only in the King James Bible that this verse has been accurately presented by showing us that it was GOD (THEOS) who took human form ("manifested in the flesh") as Jesus of Nazareth. All other modern translations have expunged "God" from that verse and substituted another word. Originally a Unitarian was behind this change, or at least made sure that "God" was removed. And this in spite of the fact that all Greek manuscripts have THEOS (abbreviated in the majuscules) (other than two very corrupt manuscripts). Once again this is why Christians should stick with the KJB.
Well since you have made that accusation, let's see if it has any validity. You have not even considered the reason why, nor have you looked at the Hebrew.
1. Firstly the Hebrew word literally means "opposition".
Strong's Concordance
tenuah: opposition
Original Word: תְּנוּאָה
Part of Speech: Noun Feminine
Transliteration: tenuah
Phonetic Spelling: (ten-oo-aw')
Definition: opposition
2. Only the NASB has used that word precisely. Other translations have used other words.
New American Standard Bible
According to the number of days which you spied out the land, forty days, for every day you shall bear your guilt a year, even forty years, and you will know My opposition.
3. God was in fact prepared to disinherit the Israelites, had Moses not interceded for them:
6And Joshua the son of Nun, and Caleb the son of Jephunneh, which were of them that searched the land, rent their clothes: 7And they spake unto all the company of the children of Israel, saying, The land, which we passed through to search it, is an exceeding good land. 8If the LORD delight in us, then he will bring us into this land, and give it us; a land which floweth with milk and honey. 9Only rebel not ye against the LORD, neither fear ye the people of the land; for they are bread for us: their defence is departed from them, and the LORD is with us: fear them not. 10But all the congregation bade stone them with stones. And the glory of the LORD appeared in the tabernacle of the congregation before all the children of Israel. 11And the LORD said unto Moses, How long will this people provoke me? and how long will it be ere they believe me, for all the signs which I have shewed among them? 12I will smite them with the pestilence, and disinherit them, and will make of thee a greater nation and mightier than they.
4. Entry into the land of Canaan was based on a CONDITIONAL PROMISE. Since the Israelites opposed God as seen above, God was in opposition to Israel. Thus this statement is perfectly valid: After the number of the days in which ye searched the land, even forty days, each day for a year, shall ye bear your iniquities, even forty years, and ye shall know my breach of promise.
Those are NOT "seven OT books". Those are all a part of the non-canonical (not inspired) Apocrypha. Only Catholic Bibles have those extra books but they have also mishmashed them into the OT.Thanks why does the Modern KJV not have the 7 OT books and chapters of Esther and Daniel? Ever read the faith story of Susana in Dan 13?
Had you done so you would not have attacked that translation in the KJB. And had you looked at the total context you would have understood why the KJB translated it the way they did.So on what basis are you assuming that I did not look at the hebrew?
Had you done so you would not have attacked that translation in the KJB. And had you looked at the total context you would have understood why the KJB translated it the way they did.
New Living TranslationEveryone should note that it is only in the King James Bible that this verse has been accurately presented by showing us that it was GOD (THEOS) who took human form ("manifested in the flesh") as Jesus of Nazareth. All other modern translations have expunged "God" from that verse and substituted another word. Originally a Unitarian was behind this change, or at least made sure that "God" was removed. And this in spite of the fact that all Greek manuscripts have THEOS (abbreviated in the majuscules) (other than two very corrupt manuscripts). Once again this is why Christians should stick with the KJB.
The original Kjv had them until the English Bible society deleted them by the tradition of men, the Wycliffe Bible has them? The Jews accepted them but not those in Jerusalem cos they said there are no Hebrew manuscripts but at the Dead Sea scrolls they found Hebrew manuscripts, I guess cos Luther said so James is not scripture and many in the early church did not include the book of revelation, so who has authority to say what is and what is not scripture?Those are NOT "seven OT books". Those are all a part of the non-canonical (not inspired) Apocrypha. Only Catholic Bibles have those extra books but they have also mishmashed them into the OT.