Climate change -- Existential threat to humanity

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
36,684
6,732
113
#1
Biden torched for claiming climate change is bigger threat than nuclear war


I have a solution to the problem of burning fossil fuel.

1. Burning of fossil fuel is mainly a problem when we are talking about transportation. Airplanes, Ships, Cars and trains.

So I will give you the solution how we can eliminate the burning of all fossil fuel in transportation.

2. There is also the problem of burning fossil fuel to generate electricity. This can easily be replaced with Nuclear, hydro, and some renewables like solar and wind. Therefore I will just focus on solving the problem with transportation.

1. Airplanes and Ships -- All we need to do is replace these with sail boats, problem solved.

2. Cars and Trucks -- Again, just replace these with horse and buggy. You can also use barges and man made canals.

3. Trains -- replace diesel with electric and use nuclear power to generate the power.

There you go, 0 emissions, problem solved.
 

Gideon300

Well-known member
Mar 18, 2021
5,354
3,151
113
#2
Biden torched for claiming climate change is bigger threat than nuclear war


I have a solution to the problem of burning fossil fuel.

1. Burning of fossil fuel is mainly a problem when we are talking about transportation. Airplanes, Ships, Cars and trains.

So I will give you the solution how we can eliminate the burning of all fossil fuel in transportation.

2. There is also the problem of burning fossil fuel to generate electricity. This can easily be replaced with Nuclear, hydro, and some renewables like solar and wind. Therefore I will just focus on solving the problem with transportation.

1. Airplanes and Ships -- All we need to do is replace these with sail boats, problem solved.

2. Cars and Trucks -- Again, just replace these with horse and buggy. You can also use barges and man made canals.

3. Trains -- replace diesel with electric and use nuclear power to generate the power.

There you go, 0 emissions, problem solved.
Easy to say, hard to do. How many horses will you need? Where will you stable them? Feed them? And who gets to clean up the mess? Sailing ships? Please. It would be better to use hydrogen as a fuel, which is being worked on.

The world is on the way to zero emissions. It's just hard. Unless you are prepared to live in a cave. Good luck getting the rest of the world to agree.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
19,218
6,610
113
62
#4
Biden torched for claiming climate change is bigger threat than nuclear war


I have a solution to the problem of burning fossil fuel.

1. Burning of fossil fuel is mainly a problem when we are talking about transportation. Airplanes, Ships, Cars and trains.

So I will give you the solution how we can eliminate the burning of all fossil fuel in transportation.

2. There is also the problem of burning fossil fuel to generate electricity. This can easily be replaced with Nuclear, hydro, and some renewables like solar and wind. Therefore I will just focus on solving the problem with transportation.

1. Airplanes and Ships -- All we need to do is replace these with sail boats, problem solved.

2. Cars and Trucks -- Again, just replace these with horse and buggy. You can also use barges and man made canals.

3. Trains -- replace diesel with electric and use nuclear power to generate the power.

There you go, 0 emissions, problem solved.
And he's a progressive? Isn't the word progress in progressive?

Well, I guess if Obama can lead from behind, no reason Biden can move forward by going backwards.
 

Gideon300

Well-known member
Mar 18, 2021
5,354
3,151
113
#5
This is just a pipe dream. We need less flatulence from these idiots who are trying to deceive everyone.
It's achievable. Unless, of course, the world self destructs beforehand. In a couple of decades we will likely have fusion power. That will change a lot of things. Just not the wicked heart of fallen humanity.
 
Feb 1, 2023
82
51
18
#6
Let's not forget that after the time of Man of sin comes a milenia of Jesus's reign on Earth and after that man will raise war against God for the last time and God will destroy the earth. So no Nuclear war is still a bigger threat than Global warming
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,776
113
#7
It's achievable. Unless, of course, the world self destructs beforehand.
If you know anything about these matter you should know that it is a TOTAL FANTASY. To have zero emissions means to firstly kill everyone on the planet. Secondly India, China, Russia, and the entire third world gives a hoot about this Western elitist fantasy. Especially when they see those arrogant elites jetting around in their private jets to congratulate each other as to how well they have duped the Sheeple, while eating steaks and telling the world to eat bugs!
 
Feb 1, 2023
82
51
18
#8
If you know anything about these matter you should know that it is a TOTAL FANTASY. To have zero emissions means to firstly kill everyone on the planet. Secondly India, China, Russia, and the entire third world gives a hoot about this Western elitist fantasy. Especially when they see those arrogant elites jetting around in their private jets to congratulate each other as to how well they have duped the Sheeple, while eating steaks and telling the world to eat bugs!
 

Attachments

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
36,684
6,732
113
#10
Easy to say, hard to do. How many horses will you need? Where will you stable them? Feed them? And who gets to clean up the mess? Sailing ships? Please. It would be better to use hydrogen as a fuel, which is being worked on.

The world is on the way to zero emissions. It's just hard. Unless you are prepared to live in a cave. Good luck getting the rest of the world to agree.
Of course it is absurd, but until these people like Greta, AOC and Kerry start using sailing ships to cross the ocean and horses to ride to work I will treat them as absurd.

That said for 6,000 years of human history this was how we travelled except perhaps for the last 150 years. That is approximately 98% of human history.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
36,684
6,732
113
#11
If you know anything about these matter you should know that it is a TOTAL FANTASY. To have zero emissions means to firstly kill everyone on the planet.
That would work too.
 

shittim

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2016
13,805
7,788
113
#12
He made everything we need for as long as we will need it as He continues His plan to redeem His creation to Him.
He was clear that in these days many would worship the creation and not the creator, that is what this tree hugging appears to me to be.:)(y):unsure::coffee:
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
36,684
6,732
113
#14
I suspect that 90% of the world's population never flies across the ocean. Every time these elites try to force feed their climate religion on the rest of the world we should demand that we immediately cease flights over the ocean and use sailboats instead. You can call, fax, email, Zoom, there is no reason to claim some kind of urgency to have to fly.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,688
1,102
113
#15
Just my subjective opinion but I think mutually assured destruction is probably enough of a deterrent for anyone to actually use nuclear weapons
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
36,684
6,732
113
#16
Just my subjective opinion but I think mutually assured destruction is probably enough of a deterrent for anyone to actually use nuclear weapons
Just like no one would poison the land, or the water or the air knowing that this will poison them as well. Oh wait...

Why would all these nations be building massive underground cities, tunnels and bunkers if it isn't to avoid their own mutual assured destruction? Human history has shown us that when the most twisted and depraved become ruler, dictator, emperor, pope, etc. that there is no limit to the destruction they will do.

The Bible tells us it will be the spirit of Nero who burned down half of Rome so he could buy it at fire sale prices.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,688
1,102
113
#17
Nuclear power is mostly cleaned except for the problem of the waste it produces which we still haven't figured out what to do with
I said there's multiple times but I'll say it again. Just a couple decades ago, tornadoes in December were almost unheard of. Now we get them every december. So clearly something is going on with climate
 

shittim

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2016
13,805
7,788
113
#18
We all know people who repeat the same wrong information over and over and over, you are not the first.:(:)(y):unsure::coffee:
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
19,218
6,610
113
62
#19
Nuclear power is mostly cleaned except for the problem of the waste it produces which we still haven't figured out what to do with
I said there's multiple times but I'll say it again. Just a couple decades ago, tornadoes in December were almost unheard of. Now we get them every december. So clearly something is going on with climate
That's a legitimate claim unless it's a repeated pattern over longer periods of time. Weather hasn't been tracked long enough to know.
I don't particularly care that individuals make such claims without qualifying them. But when governments do so in an attempt to limit freedom and coerce populations, it is more than a little suspicious.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,688
1,102
113
#20
We all know people who repeat the same wrong information over and over and over, you are not the first.:(:)(y):unsure::coffee:
What did I say that was false? Tell me specifically and don't just troll like you always do