Wrap your head around this, I have known many parents who did not abort their baby who had a fetal abnormality and guess what the baby survived and thrived.
But let's move on shall we, to more cogent, coherent, evidenced based arguments.
Appealing to outlier situations and extreme cases does not make an argument nor does it justify abortion on demand.
I am waiting for your moral and scientific argument which supports abortion on demand until birth.
You speak in generalities but are never quite forthcoming with your full position.
So do you have a well thought out argument? And do you have a clear position any limits/non limits to abortion you can articulate clearly?
But let's move on shall we, to more cogent, coherent, evidenced based arguments.
Appealing to outlier situations and extreme cases does not make an argument nor does it justify abortion on demand.
I am waiting for your moral and scientific argument which supports abortion on demand until birth.
You speak in generalities but are never quite forthcoming with your full position.
So do you have a well thought out argument? And do you have a clear position any limits/non limits to abortion you can articulate clearly?
BTW, I sincerely doubt that you have known many parents who did not abort their baby who had a fetal abnormality and guess what the baby survived and thrived. There are unfortunately certain fetal anomalies that always result in death, e.g., having non-functioning lungs or a defective heart. Appealing to outlier situations and extreme cases does not make a valid argument.
The decision to abort a pregnancy should be left entirely to the woman and her doctor, with consent of her husband. Period.
- 1
- Show all