It's only defamation if it's untrue. I don't believe that has been demonstrated.
Alex Jones hearings
- Thread starter Dude653
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
It would seem to be highly offensive and irresponsible to make the statements he made about the school shooting unless he had proof beyond a reasonable doubt that it was true.
No. This is from History.com
The Inquisition was a powerful office set up within the Catholic Church to root out and punish heresy throughout Europe and the Americas. Beginning in the 12th century and continuing for hundreds of years, the Inquisition is infamous for the severity of its tortures and its persecution of Jews and Muslims. Its worst manifestation was in Spain, where the Spanish Inquisition was a dominant force for more than 200 years, resulting in some 32,000 executions.
Regardless of whether or not Alex Jones lied on the witness stand it seems very obvious to me, a casual observer with no dog in the fight, that he is being punished for heresy against the powers that be.
If the judgement had been $100 million, $1 million to each of the 100 families he offended I'd agree that the analogy is poor. But it was so over the top and you have these raving lunatics running around telling people he needs to burn in hell, that I'll stick with my analogy being appropriate.
Not sure how you can say for sure 100% it was a false flag unless you were there on that day and know every individual that was involved?
I don't know why I keep having to repeat this but this man slandered and defamed craving families and profited while doing so and you're trying to turn him into a martyr
This is why you have lost any and all credibility trying to tell me anything about the Bible or Christianity
Attachments
Occam's razor. The idea that has to make the fewest assumptions is usually the logical path you want to pursue
So which scenario is more likely,
A.. it didn't happen and the police department, the local hospital, the corner, the local news stations, and the entire town is in on the LIE or
B.. it really happened
My default position for most of the rubbish from the Lame Stream Fake News is that if they can't prove it happened beyond all reasonable doubt, I reject it. Sandy Hoax falls into that category for me. Lots of plot holes in the story - Lame Stream Fake News failed in its job (once again). If they want me to believe it happened, they've gotta prove it, and address all those plot holes instead of suing independent journalists for millions for hurting feelings of a bunch of what are most likely crisis actors, whilst genocidal Communists like Fauci and Billy Boy get a free pass and accolades.
It seems preposterous to me that if this were true that the it could be kept secret.You doubt such evidence exists? The laughing father alone (who turned on the tears for the cameras) is all the evidence I need to require further proof of claim. And that might involve asking some pretty searching questions of the alleged bereaved. Feelings might be hurt!
The claim, as I understand it is, that the Sandy Hook school shooting was a hoax.
If that were true then teachers would have to be in on it, police would have to be in on it, parents of all the children supposedly shot would have to be in on it, the pastors who ran the funerals would have to be in on it, the people who signed the death certificates would have to be in on it, the EMT's would have to be in on it, and they would have to somehow hide these children.
So to answer your question "do I doubt that Sandy Hook was a hoax?" Yes.
No, I didn't turn him into a martyr, you did. If he had been sued according to the law, and if the law had been followed concerning the limits you can have in a defamation lawsuit, then it would have been what it was. But once they threw off that limit and turned it into a billion dollar defamation, then it became something else.
Same standard should apply to Alex Jones I would think, did he prove his position?
I respect that reasoning. But in my view, Alex Jones doesn't have the track record of lying that the LSM does. I'm sure in time, we will learn the truth. And I'm fairly confident I am right. ;-) (But even if wrong, it was a legitimate accusation judging by the alleged father's reaction).
Do you think the entire thing was a hoax, as in they were all actors or a mix of truth and fakery?