"Could be" is different from "there was" as if it was the truth. One accepts the possibility that it could have happened but not claiming that without a doubt it did happen.
And that is the difference....a huge difference. One statement accepts that security is always fleeting and the other was an outrageous lie that held no basis in fact or truth. And the publishing of slanderous lies that harms an innocent company is subject to monetary damages.
Tucker knew he was lying, he continued to lie, and when presented with the truth refused to retract any lie he had told. That tends to get winning judgment by juries. And of course Fox lost its case....that was a foregone conclusion. They should have tried to mitigate the damages a long time ago. But instead their legal team thought they might argue well enough to get away with it. (Inflated ego)
You make choices and pay the price.
And that is the difference....a huge difference. One statement accepts that security is always fleeting and the other was an outrageous lie that held no basis in fact or truth. And the publishing of slanderous lies that harms an innocent company is subject to monetary damages.
Tucker knew he was lying, he continued to lie, and when presented with the truth refused to retract any lie he had told. That tends to get winning judgment by juries. And of course Fox lost its case....that was a foregone conclusion. They should have tried to mitigate the damages a long time ago. But instead their legal team thought they might argue well enough to get away with it. (Inflated ego)
You make choices and pay the price.
Will have to try and find what they actually said. Buried now because I have been looking for it. If anyone does find those comments, please post. I understand that Canada won't use these systems because they don't find them trustworthy. But I can't find those comments either. May be the engine I'm using.
- 1
- Show all