King Charles is crowned king

[2ndTimeIsTheCharm]

Is this actually true? I know it's common belief, but where is the law which states the King (or monarch) has no power, and it's really the parliament which has the power, and if such a law does exist, from where does this law derive its authority? There are many colonies still in existence that derive their legal basis/constitution from the power and presence of the monarch (i.e. the Queen, her heirs and successors). If the monarch actually has no ruling power, all these colonies are living a legal lie, effectively in anarchy.

If the monarchs really had no power, I think there would have been much more of a murder investigation into them around the death of Princess Diana. Although, I accept that there were likewise no investigations into Jimmy Savile, the high-ranking pedophile ring member, and he wasn't royalty (although he was allegedly good friends with the prince). One way or another (i.e. by legitimate means or illegitimate), I think the royal family still hold a lot of power.

You can click on the links and footnote for more information:

"The monarch takes little direct part in government. The authority to use the sovereign's formal powers is almost all delegated, either by statute or by convention, to ministers or officers of the Crown, or other public bodies. Thus the acts of state done in the name of the Crown, such as Crown Appointments,[11] even if personally performed by the monarch, such as the King's Speech and the State Opening of Parliament, depend upon decisions made elsewhere...."

- Monarch of the United Kingdom (Wiki)
(accessed Friday, May 12, 2023)​

He's not the antichrist. Too early for the antichrist to be revealed. If anything he's just being used as a distraction away from the real antichrist.

❧

 

[ZNP]

He's not the antichrist. Too early for the antichrist to be revealed. If anything he's just being used as a distraction away from the real antichrist.
❧

I have been very interested in eschatology since 1972 and during that time the one thing I have seen repeatedly is that no one has the certainty on this doctrine.

I was trained on JN Darby and Watchman Nee's eschatology but have certainly been open to listening to many others who I do not fully agree with and yet they also make some very good points.

Still, after 50 years I would not speak as you have just done here.

 

[Moses_Young]

He's not the antichrist. Too early for the antichrist to be revealed. If anything he's just being used as a distraction away from the real antichrist.

❧

My point is that's not actually a law. And even if it were, it would have to be a law accepted by the king (or a previous reigning monarch) to have any legal weight. If you go to court and produce a wikipedia article, it won't carry weight. Even an employer who has claimed "I'm not responsible for the safety of my employees" will still find himself held legally responsible, depending on the jurisdiction. One can't undo most laws simply by claiming the opposite. There are formal, legal processes for monarchs to abdicate or relinquish power (as done by the Russian Tsar in 1918), but to my knowledge, this has never been done by the English monarch. The closest event to such (to my knowledge) was the Magna Carta, signed by King John in 1215 (reissued 1297?), which granted more rights to the people.

 

[ZNP]

Cop28 President-designate meets King Charles to discuss climate change solutions
Dr Sultan Al Jaber says British monarch is an 'inspirational advocate for environmental action'

https://www.thenationalnews.com/cli...-meets-king-charles-to-discuss-climate-plans/

Dr Sultan Al Jaber, the Cop28 president-designate and UAE Special Envoy for Climate Change, has met Britain's King Charles III to discuss the Emirates' plans for action to tackle climate change.

The Office of the Special Envoy for Climate Change tweeted an image of the pair shaking hands as they met at Buckingham Palace in London on Thursday.

It said that Dr Al Jaber, who is also the UAE's Minister of Industry and Advanced Technology, was honoured to meet King Charles, describing him as “an inspirational advocate for environmental action”.

The Cop28 president-designate looks forward to collaborating with King Charles, his partners and the world “to work closely on solutions at the intersection of climate and nature, focus on concrete actions across sectors to keep 1.5°C alive and support those most affected by climate impacts”, Dr Al Jaber's office added.

 

[ZNP]

Klaus Schwab and Prince Charles on why we need a Great Reset - listen to the podcast

• The Great Reset launched by World Economic Forum and HRH The Prince of Wales.
• Seeking better form of capitalism as world recovers from pandemic.
• Welcomed by UN, IMF, and companies Microsoft, Mastercard and BP.
• Subscribe to podcasts: World Vs Virus and The Great Reset.

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/the-great-reset-this-weeks-world-vs-virus-podcast/

This is why we refer to it as the "plandemic" the plan was to use this as a justification for the great reset which includes the mark of the beast, one world currency and one world government.

 

[ZNP]

The Green new deal is how the UN is seizing power, it is part of the plandemic to bring in one world government and one world currency. He is also instrumental in this one world government/ecumenical movement. Why wouldn't he be, they have a Christian house (Catholic) and he is the head of the Anglican church, he is descended from King David and so heir to the throne in Israel and they have a Jewish house, and he is a Phd in Islamic studies and has converted to Islam and they have an Islamic house. Read carefully and you will discover that Charles is the man behind the curtain on one world currency, one world government and one world religion.

 

[2ndTimeIsTheCharm]

Still, after 50 years I would not speak as you have just done here.

🤷🏻‍♀️ That's your prerogative. I'm fine with that.

But I'm still pretty sure the antichrist is not King Charles. And I'm find with you not agreeing with that too.

❧

 

[ZNP]

I don't know who the Antichrist is, but I do know from the Bible I expect the following:

1. I expect him to be a 33rd degree Mason. The NT says that the whole world lies in the Evil one and I cannot see Satan giving this position to anyone who is not fully vetted Satanist. The commonwealth games and the Satanic ritual there that Prince Charles opened is proof that he is embraced by Satanists.

2. I expect him to be able to unite the three major world religions: Christianity, Islam and Judaism. Without any question there is a religious component to the Antichrist rule and from my reading no one has more credibility with these three religions than King Charles.

3. He will set up the abomination of desolation in the Holy Temple. This statue of him as the "savior of the world" that is 10 cubits high is designed to go into the Holy of Holies alongside the Cherubim who are also 10 cubits high.

4. I believe from the NT that the Antichrist must be a king, narrowing it down even further.

5. The antichrist must forsake the faith of his fathers according to Daniel and Charles has done that.

6. The antichrist is known as the little horn and that is one of the nicknames for Charles.

7. He will be involved in negotiating peace with Israel and rebuilding the temple, just as Charles has been.

8. The number of his name is 666 just as it is with Charles, prince of Wales.

I know that some think that the Assyrian is the antichrist, but that is merely an assumption. The Assyrian can be another key player. I don't doubt that Emmanuel Macron is a key player, and Klaus Schwab is a key player, and Bill Gates is a key player, and George Soros is a key player and Elon Musk is a key player. It would be foolish to think that there are not other key players in the end of the age referred to in the Bible.

 

[ZNP]

The antichrist will also think to change laws

25 And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.

The 10 Commandments of Climate Change

https://www.endtime.com/endtime-show/the-10-commandments-of-climate-change/

In compliance with the messaging of Pope Francis, world leaders are gathering at Mt. Sinai to put forward a prophetic interreligious call to action called Ten Universal Principles for Climate Justice. They are seemingly trying to recreate The Ten Commandments that Moses received from God from this very same mountain thousands of years ago.

Israeli activist smashes climate change 10 commandments atop Mt. Sinai
Yosef Abramowitz imitated Moses’s smashing of the 10 biblical commandments in a demonstration against climate change.
By SAM HALPERN

Published: NOVEMBER 21, 2022 11:54
Updated: NOVEMBER 21, 2022 11:58

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/culture/article-722957

It turns out that King Charles was instrumental behind the scenes in getting these ten commandments.

 

[ZNP]

To be fair there have been four people who have pushed back on all the evidence that King Charles is the Antichrist, so let's go over all the reasons they have provided:

 

[ZNP]

Don't forget, Charles opened these ceremonies

 

[Niki7]

You didn't quote me, you paraphrased in a way that implied I said something I didn't say. It was sleazy and despicable.

You still have not answered the question of why you are so desperate to attack this thread though it is becoming more and more desperate and despicable.

Well I did quote you directly but if now you wish to disown it, see if you can get a mod to delete if for you.

Stop making such ridiculous comments as myself or anyone else here is desperate. I think you give far too much credence to your importance in this forum. I disagree with your premise that Charles is the antichrist. Get over it.

 

[Niki7]

You still have not answered the question of why you are so desperate to attack this thread though it is becoming more and more desperate and despicable.

Look bright eyes...in the post above this nonsense I said I was leaving until tomorrow which is now today. I don't spend 19.5 hrs a day on here like some people seem to do and I don't owe you any answer whatsoever especially when you are so creative with your ad hominin posts directed at me. So original

 

[Niki7]

Would some kind person please explain to the hyper ventilating op that I simply disagree with the conspiracy theory that Charles is the antichrist?

He seems to put high value in my opinion but I really just do not see what he is all about and that is my choice.

As I have explained, it is not that I do not think anyone has the right to post theories or conspiracy theories, it is confusing them with the Bible and stretching what the Bible says to fit the current myopic stare in Charles direction and crown him the Bible's supposed worst villain (apart from the devil himself of course)

Having checked out other of the op's threads, he appears to favor many conspiracy theories with a fervor that won't be denied. That is too bad since I am sure most here do not have personal stakes in this hobby and while possibly not quite so excited about conspiracies, may still interact with the op. The problem occurs when the op decides he needs to censor some as he becomes conflicted with the average person's right and ability to disagree with what he postulates.

This is a forum; a public forum and if a person cannot deal with disagreement, they might be in the wrong place.

 

[ZNP]

WEF “Great Reset” King Charles Boasts He Is Direct Descendant of Muhammad

https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/wef-great-reset-king-charles-boasts-he-is-direct-descendant-of-muhammad/

King Charles is a direct descendant of Prophet Muhammad, the founder of Islam, according to a BBC News broadcast and Burke’s Peerage, the genealogical guide to royal ancestry.

Harold Brooks-Baker of Burke’s Peerage revealed the British royal family is directly descended from Mohammad through the Arab kings of Seville, who ruled an Islamic caliphate in Spain after the death of Muhammad.

After carefully tracing King Charles’s ancestry, it was determined that the British monarch is the 43rd great-grandson of the Prophet Muhammad.

And he is very proud of this fact.

 

[ZNP]

To make things clear to the people of the UK, the then Prince Charles said in a speech a few years ago, “I will be the protector of all religions instead of one religion as soon as I become the king of Great Britain.”

https://www.awazthevoice.in/world-n...ionship-of-king-charles-with-islam-15664.html

What is the relationship of King Charles with Islam?

 

[ZNP]

This claim was put forward by no less a personage than the grand mufti of Cyprus: "Did you know that Prince Charles has converted to Islam. Yes, yes. He is a Muslim. I can't say more. But it happened in Turkey. Oh, yes, he converted all right. When you get home check on how often he travels to Turkey. You'll find that your future king is a Muslim."3

3 Quoted in Giles Milton, The Riddle and the Knight: In Search of Sir John Mandeville (London: Allison & Busby, 1996), p. 78.

Prince Charles of Arabia
by Ronni L. Gordon and David M. Stillman
Middle East Quarterly
September 1997, pp. 3-7

https://www.meforum.org/356/prince-charles-of-arabia

I have counted 65 official visits to Islamic nations by Charles since 1989

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_official_overseas_trips_made_by_Charles_III

http://islamicmonitor.blogspot.com/2012/01/prince-charles-inaugurates-hajj.html

 

[ZNP]

Wow, take a look at the coat of Arms of the accession of King Charles III

The Unicorn is pale green

https://www.google.com/search?q=coa...pr=3&safe=active&ssui=on#imgrc=eaOKj45NZ7Ub1M

 

[Nehemiah6]

King Charles is a direct descendant of Prophet Muhammad, the founder of Islam, according to a BBC News broadcast and Burke’s Peerage, the genealogical guide to royal ancestry.

Sounds like pure baloney. But he is a crypto Muslim.

 

[Susanna]

Would some kind person please explain to the hyper ventilating op that I simply disagree with the conspiracy theory that Charles is the antichrist?

He seems to put high value in my opinion but I really just do not see what he is all about and that is my choice.

As I have explained, it is not that I do not think anyone has the right to post theories or conspiracy theories, it is confusing them with the Bible and stretching what the Bible says to fit the current myopic stare in Charles direction and crown him the Bible's supposed worst villain (apart from the devil himself of course)

Having checked out other of the op's threads, he appears to favor many conspiracy theories with a fervor that won't be denied. That is too bad since I am sure most here do not have personal stakes in this hobby and while possibly not quite so excited about conspiracies, may still interact with the op. The problem occurs when the op decides he needs to censor some as he becomes conflicted with the average person's right and ability to disagree with what he postulates.

This is a forum; a public forum and if a person cannot deal with disagreement, they might be in the wrong place.

I don’t think he’s tuned in on terminology including the word “disagreement”.