Ah… now I understand: you think your assumptions are valid despite a complete absence of evidence. Okay.My belief is that those who can't even see that the horizon is flat are going to be wrong on many other vitally IMPORTANT things too.![]()
Ah… now I understand: you think your assumptions are valid despite a complete absence of evidence. Okay.My belief is that those who can't even see that the horizon is flat are going to be wrong on many other vitally IMPORTANT things too.![]()
Turn that around. For a start, the curvature of the earth can be seen. All you need is the right equipment or be at a sufficient height. So that means that FE people are wrong on everything else as well?
A rainbow is shaped like arc, not a dome.
You keep responding to me with ‘flat horizon’ pics. You have obviously lost the plot as I have not addressed the shape of the horizon at all.
The shape of the flat horizon is the shape of the flat earth; this is another win for all of us who know God created the flat earth.You keep responding to me with ‘flat horizon’ pics. You have obviously lost the plot as I have not addressed the shape of the horizon at all.
The arc of rainbows fits perfectly within the shape of the flat earth dome.A rainbow is shaped like arc, not a dome.
The arc of a rainbow has nothing whatsoever to do with the alleged flat earth dome. Even if the dome were real (which it is not), rainbows would be completely unrelated.The arc of rainbows fits perfectly within the shape of the flat earth dome.
If you see a rainbow from a high enough altitude, such as a passenger jet, it will be completely round. Just like the earth.
You're making my job easy.If you see a rainbow from a high enough altitude, such as a passenger jet, it will be completely round. Just like the earth.
How many times must your theory be debunked before you accept the truth?