I was in a bible study and happened to mention that I was at Washington DC for January 6th event and what I saw was very different from what is portrayed in the MSM. That was relevant to the discussion at the time because he was portraying the entire rally as "Christian nationalism", however, the Bible study was not about the Fedsurrection.
Anyway they want evidence that the Feds were involved in the January 6th "insurrection". I could easily pull something off of Bannon's warroom and share it, but if they still don't realize the Feds involvement now then they obviously do not watch Bannon and probably will reject that, they also must not have seen Tucker.
Here is what I need help with -- just a credible source that I will not have to debate about, perhaps Durhams report if someone can summarize how it fingers the feds, or NYT, or WAPO, etc. I feel I owe them a response but figure there are people on this forum who are much more on top of the latest news on this topic.
‘Enveloped in Politicization’: FBI Whistleblowers Reveal ‘Serious Abuses,’ House Report Finds
House Judiciary Republicans on May 18 unveiled a whistleblower report (pdf) showing “serious abuse” and misallocations of resources by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
A whistleblower told Republican investigators that the FBI has become “cancerous” and has “let itself become enveloped in this politicization and weaponization,” echoing earlier whistleblower testimony that the FBI had become “rotted at its core.”
“It is clear from these disclosures, and especially in the wake of Special Counsel John Durham’s report, that the FBI has become politically weaponized,” the report said.
FBI reportedly had up to eight informants in the Proud Boys on Jan 6
Gustaf Kilander
November 15, 2022·3 min read
The FBI had up to eight informants in the Proud Boys for several months around the time of the insurrection on January 6, 2021, court documents have shown.
The presence of the informants was revealed in a number of legal filings by defence lawyers for five members of the far-right group,The New York Times reported. They’re scheduled to go to trial next month on charges of seditious conspiracy in connection to the Capitol attack.
Anyway they want evidence that the Feds were involved in the January 6th "insurrection". I could easily pull something off of Bannon's warroom and share it, but if they still don't realize the Feds involvement now then they obviously do not watch Bannon and probably will reject that, they also must not have seen Tucker.
Here is what I need help with -- just a credible source that I will not have to debate about, perhaps Durhams report if someone can summarize how it fingers the feds, or NYT, or WAPO, etc. I feel I owe them a response but figure there are people on this forum who are much more on top of the latest news on this topic.
‘Enveloped in Politicization’: FBI Whistleblowers Reveal ‘Serious Abuses,’ House Report Finds
House Judiciary Republicans on May 18 unveiled a whistleblower report (pdf) showing “serious abuse” and misallocations of resources by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
A whistleblower told Republican investigators that the FBI has become “cancerous” and has “let itself become enveloped in this politicization and weaponization,” echoing earlier whistleblower testimony that the FBI had become “rotted at its core.”
“It is clear from these disclosures, and especially in the wake of Special Counsel John Durham’s report, that the FBI has become politically weaponized,” the report said.
FBI reportedly had up to eight informants in the Proud Boys on Jan 6
Gustaf Kilander
November 15, 2022·3 min read
The FBI had up to eight informants in the Proud Boys for several months around the time of the insurrection on January 6, 2021, court documents have shown.
The presence of the informants was revealed in a number of legal filings by defence lawyers for five members of the far-right group,The New York Times reported. They’re scheduled to go to trial next month on charges of seditious conspiracy in connection to the Capitol attack.
-
2
-
1
- Show all
