Flat earth debunked.

[MrE]

An open challenge to all Flat-Earth believers...

Debunk the following video:

What specifically are you referring to?

 

[Gideon300]

It's significantly faster on the way back. Some 1.5 - 2 hours faster, sometimes. Something doesn't add up.

Absolutely it adds up. The jet stream can be up to 220 knots. Aircraft fly below it going west and in it going east.

 

[kinda]

That's not even worthy of sarcasm.

"A" for effort?!?!

Flat earthers got to be graded on a sliding scale, since there is no defined scale at the moment. It's all subjective and untestable.

 

[Gideon300]

View attachment 252451

The human eye is not a fish eye. The curvature of the earth was first observed by a ballonist in the 1930's. It's been seen countless times since.

 

[Gideon300]

Note the shill technique? They can't refute your obvious and conclusive proof that Earth is flat, so they talk all around it with nonsense, and finally distract with some random post that Flat Earthers will never create an accurate map. Not in their lifetimes, at least, because it seems they are going to take their ball-Earth fairy tale with them to the grave, even at the cost of the truth.

The next generation of people I doubt will be so hard-hearted, and there will be more and more accurate Flat Earth maps (the old ball-Earth globes and mis-proportioned ball-Earther maps will be relegated to the museums or the dustbins where they belong).

There are NO FE maps. No Flerfer has ventured out to look at the real world in order to survey it. They dare not, because they are terrified that they will be proven wrong. "Conclusive proof"? You cannot prove something that does not exist. "Hard hearted"? It's the increasingly godless present generation that promotes the FE myth.

 

[Zandar]

the gleason map is the flat earth map

 

[RaceRunner]

That's not even worthy of sarcasm.

 

[RaceRunner]

There are NO FE maps. No Flerfer has ventured out to look at the real world in order to survey it. They dare not, because they are terrified that they will be proven wrong. "Conclusive proof"? You cannot prove something that does not exist. "Hard hearted"? It's the increasingly godless present generation that promotes the FE myth.

 

[RaceRunner]

 

[RaceRunner]

The human eye is not a fish eye. The curvature of the earth was first observed by a ballonist in the 1930's. It's been seen countless times since.

 

[Zandar]

he's a shill brother

 

[RaceRunner]

he's a shill brother

The earth doesn't have any curvature.
https://www.tiktok.com/@kurtrussell__/video/7228799437252857095?lang=en

 

[GaryA]

They can't refute your obvious and conclusive proof that Earth is flat, so they talk all around it with nonsense, and finally distract with some random post that Flat Earthers will never create an accurate map. Not in their lifetimes, at least, because it seems they are going to take their ball-Earth fairy tale with them to the grave, even at the cost of the truth.

cognitive dissonance ?

 

[Dino246]

What specifically are you referring to?

The video as a whole, taken on/from the International Space Station.

 

[Magenta]

Note the shill technique? They can't refute your obvious and conclusive proof that Earth is flat, so they talk all around it with nonsense, and finally distract with some random post that Flat Earthers will never create an accurate map. Not in their lifetimes, at least, because it seems they are going to take their ball-Earth fairy tale with them to the grave, even at the cost of the truth.

I could not see the ground in that pic. Where was it?

 

[kinda]

This was shot looking at Toronto from Niagara-- 30-35 miles away.

Not possible on a curved earth-- even the tallest buildings would be below 'the curve' and horizon line. All you would need to see even more of the buildings, right to the base of them- is a better camera.

Not unless the earth is curving up, more proof for Concave Hollow Earth. Keep them coming.

The Heliocentric view is that, an inversion layer is causing this, or air temperatures is causing a mirage. That's their story and they are sticking to it.

 

[kinda]

I've flown to Perth and back from Melbourne many times. It's taken about the same time every time. it's faster on the way back because of the jet stream. Train travel in Australia is a joke. There are no high speed rail lines. For sure it takes longer than it should, but that's because of the network, not the shape of the earth.

I will take your word for it. If flat earthers were able to test the time it takes to travel across Australia by horseback, I would accept that, but not by train. Traveling by train is not scientific! lol

The big question is, why don't flat earthers trust airplanes?!?! Are they apart of the evil science empire of disinformation?

 

[Gideon300]

I will take your word for it. If flat earthers were able to test the time it takes to travel across Australia by horseback, I would accept that, but not by train. Traveling by train is not scientific! lol

The big question is, why don't flat earthers trust airplanes?!?! Are they apart of the evil science empire of disinformation?

Flerfers do not believe in gravity. Therefore planes are unable to land. Airports are controlled by NASA and everything you see is CGI. Neat trick, don't you think?

 

[Gideon300]

Not unless the earth is curving up, more proof for Concave Hollow Earth. Keep them coming.

The Heliocentric view is that, an inversion layer is causing this, or air temperatures is causing a mirage. That's their story and they are sticking to it.

Sorry to disappoint you, but I've seen the effect of an approaching ship coming over the horizon. It's "over" because that is exactly what is happening. I spent 3-1/2 years on a warship. We needed to consider over the horizon. Sometimes, life and death depend on it. Why do you think the crows nest was vital to the safety of a ship? The lookouts needed to be as high as possible to overcome the curvature of the earth. Lookouts were replaced by radar during and after WW2. The principle is identical. Super High frequencies are essential for radar accuracy. Those frequencies are narrow beam and straight, much like light. That's why high flying aircraft are used for surveilance. If the earth was flat or convex, aircraft would not be necessary.

 

[Gideon300]

View attachment 252467

Rubbish. Raindrops collect on my car. They are not flat. Water droplets are everywhere. Open your eyes. Have you heard of tides? Where do you think the water goes? In the FE fallacy, there should be no tides.