Ball Earth conundrums

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Handyman62

Well-known member
Jan 10, 2021
593
263
63
Rural South Carolina
Does anyone want to go on record and state, the believe the earth flies at 67,000 mph, and spins 1,000 mph?!?!
Does it really matter how fast planet Earth pizza travels around the pizza sun? Can't we all just agree that in the grand scheme of things all that really matters is how delicious planet Earth pizza taste?;)
 

timemeddler

Active member
Jul 13, 2023
355
144
43
No one needs to "disprove" what you have said - it is not significant enough to stand as 'proof' one way or another - there are too many factors to consider (today).

We have transmitted broadcasts between the U.S. and Europe (and other places) - back when 'tower' radio was all there was in existence. Look it up.
I dare you you to repeat that at a ham fest. Tower radio, real tech term.
 

timemeddler

Active member
Jul 13, 2023
355
144
43
Sorry Gary. I got distracted by the troll. How about marine radar (taken from another thread)?

It sounds like a typical, off-the-shelf military radar has a range of about 25 nautical miles (although some have much further range). I believe 25 nautical miles translates to 46.3 km.

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-range-of-an-average-marine-radar-on-US-Navy-ships?share=1

We all know that radars only travel in straight lines. Presuming the radar is mounted 10 m above the water (I think this is conservative, as lots of boats would be shorter), and the boat it is detecting is 10 m above the water, the maximum distance the radar could detect another boat on a ball-Earth is 24.79 km.

To confirm, just enter the heights of the observer and object in the calculation page attached.

https://rechneronline.de/sehwinkel/distance-horizon.php

So, ball-Earth theory predicts a maximum radar range for the most powerful radar of 24.79 km, due to the curvature of Earth, but a standard radar (probably mounted much lower) can detect up to 46.3 km. Note also that more powerful radar can purportedly achieve much greater range.

How does this work on ball-Earth? Either radar travels in curves the same way ball-Earth curves (neither measured nor observed), or ball-Earth theory is false.
Your lack of knowledge here is hilarious, RF is not a laser and can travel farther than the visual horizon due to refraction, and by the way radar is not always line of sight, lookup over the horizon radar and the Russian woodpecker.
 

Gideon300

Well-known member
Mar 18, 2021
4,951
2,876
113
I disagree.

Have you bothered to lift a finger to look into what is presented in post #404 - to see if there is something you could learn from it?

And, if you believe you see an error - by all means, point it out... (specific fact-based observation, not generalized mud-slinging, etc.)
*sigh* Do you think sailors have never used a telescope? How far the actual horizon is away depends on the height of the observer. I've already suggested an experiment that anyone can do to show the curvature of the earth. I've already said how surveying lasers prove the curvature of the earth. No FE person has bothered to look into that that I am aware of. I'm still waiting for someone to get out their telescope and see a country a few hundred miles away. You should be able to see Cuba from the Florida coast. No doubt you have a reason not to try it.
 

Moses_Young

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2019
9,282
4,998
113
Your lack of knowledge here is hilarious,
I find it ironic that those who lack knowledge accuse those with more knowledge of lacking knowledge, but I guess this is something you won't be able to understand.

RF is not a laser and can travel farther than the visual horizon due to refraction,
This is more theory than fact. A far simpler explanation, given that there is no evidence of curvature, is that RF can travel further than the visual horizon because the horizon is flat.

and by the way radar is not always line of sight, lookup over the horizon radar and the Russian woodpecker.
If radar is not always line of sight, how on Earth can it be used as proof of a ball-Earth?
 

Moses_Young

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2019
9,282
4,998
113
Some common ball-Earth conundrums, and answers to them. To me, it's easy to see who is lying.

Why does the Earth seem motionless?
Flat Earther:
Because it is motionless.
Heliocentrist: It only seems motionless because it's spinning at a perfectly uniform speed with no acceleration or deceleration ever and the atmosphere is magically velcroed to it. Actually the Earth is spinning on it's axis at 1,000 mph, rotating around the Sun at 67,000 mph, which is orbiting the Milky Way at 500,000 mph and shooting through the known Universe at 67,000,000 mph. We don't feel even the slightest bit of this motion because all the centrifugal, gravitational, and inertial forces somehow perfectly cancel out.

Why do the Sun and Moon appear to be the same size?
Flat Earther:
Because they are the same size.
Heliocentrist: They only appear to be the same size because of an incredibly perfect parallax perspective from Earth. Actually the Sun is 1.392x10^6 km in diameter and 1.496x10^8 km from Earth. The Moon is 3,474 km in diameter and 384,403 km from the Earth. And these just happen to be the EXACT diameters and distances necessary for a viewer from Earth to falsely perceive them as being the same size.

Why do the Sun, Moon, and Stars all appear to revolve around a stationary Earth?
Flat Earther:
Because they do.
Heliocentrist: The Moon does revolve around the Earth, but the Earth actually revolves around the Sun, and all the stars only seem to revolve around the Earth because the Earth itself is spinning beneath your feet!

Why do we never see the rotation of the Moon?
Flat Earther:
Because it doesn't rotate.
Globalist: Both the Moon and the Earth are actually rotating but they are doing so in such a way that from our perspective it seems that neither are. The Earth is spinning East to West at 1,000 mph while orbiting the Sun at 67,000 mph. The Moon is spinning West to East at 10.3 mph while orbiting the Earth at 2,288 mph. These motions/speeds perfectly cancel out so that the Moon always only shows us one side.

Why do the stars appear to be fixed along a celestial hemisphere?
Flat Earther: Because they are.
Heliocentrist: The stars only appear to be fixed along a celestial hemisphere because they are so incredibly far away. Even after hundreds of millions of miles of our (supposed) orbit around the Sun, the stars appear in the exact same positions at the exact same meridian times because they are many "light-years" away. A light-year is approximately 6 TRILLION miles away and that is why they falsely seem fixed from our faulty perspective.
 

Gideon300

Well-known member
Mar 18, 2021
4,951
2,876
113
I find it ironic that those who lack knowledge accuse those with more knowledge of lacking knowledge, but I guess this is something you won't be able to understand.

This is more theory than fact. A far simpler explanation, given that there is no evidence of curvature, is that RF can travel further than the visual horizon because the horizon is flat.

If radar is not always line of sight, how on Earth can it be used as proof of a ball-Earth?
Radar is line of sight at higher frequencies. At lower frequencies, it has a ground wave. Australia has developed a radar that can detect objects up to 1900 miles away. It does this by bouncing signals off the ionosphere. The reason that it can't just monitor contacts directly is that it has to account for the curvature of the earth. It took decades to develop and nearly a billion dollars to build. If there was any other technique that was practicable, that for sure would have been used instead.

Youtuber Hypohysterical History has an in depth video on this amazing system. Of course, it debunks FE so you won't look it up.
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,142
3,988
113
mywebsite.us
*sigh* Do you think sailors have never used a telescope? How far the actual horizon is away depends on the height of the observer. I've already suggested an experiment that anyone can do to show the curvature of the earth. I've already said how surveying lasers prove the curvature of the earth. No FE person has bothered to look into that that I am aware of. I'm still waiting for someone to get out their telescope and see a country a few hundred miles away. You should be able to see Cuba from the Florida coast. No doubt you have a reason not to try it.
What is this - an avoidance tactic?

What does any of this have to do with what is presented in post #404?
 

timemeddler

Active member
Jul 13, 2023
355
144
43
I find it ironic that those who lack knowledge accuse those with more knowledge of lacking knowledge, but I guess this is something you won't be able to understand.

This is more theory than fact. A far simpler explanation, given that there is no evidence of curvature, is that RF can travel further than the visual horizon because the horizon is flat.

If radar is not always line of sight, how on Earth can it be used as proof of a ball-Earth?
I've taken tests you haven't the reason over the horizon radar works is because it doesn't use vhf it typically uses hf. Hf radio can do a thousand or so miles by skipping off the upper f2 layer, hf/uhf can't. whats your explanation, you don't have one because you know nothing about the subject. Your making stuff up. I can talk to people several states over with 5 watts at 28.5 mhz, whereas at 146.52 with five times the power and an antenna with 3db of gain more than the other I can reach maybe 30 miles. Explain that with actual science, I could use another laugh. hint it has to do with maximum and minimum usable frequency and the f2 layer. Then also explain why the skip zone in between receives nothing.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,783
13,414
113
One can believe that the Earth is spherical while not necessarily holding to certain views of its movement in relation to the rest of the galaxy. You're only confusing the issues by assuming that everyone who believes anything that you reject must believe everything that you reject.
Okay @Moses_Young, you posted a "Disagree" on this.

With what, specifically, do you disagree?
 

Moses_Young

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2019
9,282
4,998
113
You're only confusing the issues by assuming that everyone who believes anything that you reject must believe everything that you reject.
Gary is not the one confusing the issues. He is quite clear and explicit. If anyone is confusing the issues, you are.
 

Moses_Young

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2019
9,282
4,998
113
I've taken tests you haven't the reason over the horizon radar works is because it doesn't use vhf it typically uses hf. Hf radio can do a thousand or so miles by skipping off the upper f2 layer, hf/uhf can't. whats your explanation, you don't have one because you know nothing about the subject. Your making stuff up. I can talk to people several states over with 5 watts at 28.5 mhz, whereas at 146.52 with five times the power and an antenna with 3db of gain more than the other I can reach maybe 30 miles. Explain that with actual science, I could use another laugh. hint it has to do with maximum and minimum usable frequency and the f2 layer. Then also explain why the skip zone in between receives nothing.
You know some Flat Earthers (myself included), believe there is a firmament, right?
 

Moses_Young

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2019
9,282
4,998
113
Radar is line of sight at higher frequencies. At lower frequencies, it has a ground wave. Australia has developed a radar that can detect objects up to 1900 miles away. It does this by bouncing signals off the ionosphere. The reason that it can't just monitor contacts directly is that it has to account for the curvature of the earth. It took decades to develop and nearly a billion dollars to build. If there was any other technique that was practicable, that for sure would have been used instead.

Youtuber Hypohysterical History has an in depth video on this amazing system. Of course, it debunks FE so you won't look it up.
You were the one claiming radar proves ball-Earth. And now you are claiming that it can detect objects 1900 miles away? Does it prove ball-Earth or doesn't it? :p I wish you would make up your mind.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,783
13,414
113
Gary is not the one confusing the issues. He is quite clear and explicit. If anyone is confusing the issues, you are.
It's clear that you just gave a knee-jerk reaction without reading either Gary's post or mine in its entirety.
 

timemeddler

Active member
Jul 13, 2023
355
144
43
You know some Flat Earthers (myself included), believe there is a firmament, right?
what is a firmament and what does it have to do with the ionosphere and the skip zone in between two stations?
 

timemeddler

Active member
Jul 13, 2023
355
144
43
Radar is line of sight at higher frequencies. At lower frequencies, it has a ground wave. Australia has developed a radar that can detect objects up to 1900 miles away. It does this by bouncing signals off the ionosphere. The reason that it can't just monitor contacts directly is that it has to account for the curvature of the earth. It took decades to develop and nearly a billion dollars to build. If there was any other technique that was practicable, that for sure would have been used instead.

Youtuber Hypohysterical History has an in depth video on this amazing system. Of course, it debunks FE so you won't look it up.
whith hf radio you have a skip zone which is the between the radio horizon caused by the curvature of the earth and the point where the reflected signal off the ionosphere comes down,this area is will not receive any signal. this is a readily observable phenomenon and will vary a with takeoff angle of the transmission and the specific frequency range being employed.
 

Gideon300

Well-known member
Mar 18, 2021
4,951
2,876
113
whith hf radio you have a skip zone which is the between the radio horizon caused by the curvature of the earth and the point where the reflected signal off the ionosphere comes down,this area is will not receive any signal. this is a readily observable phenomenon and will vary a with takeoff angle of the transmission and the specific frequency range being employed.
Yes, I was radio comms tech in the Navy with Electronic Warfare specialisation. I know both radar and radio, not as well as some but enough to know the problems caused by the curvature of the earth. I do not envy modern mariners. Sea skimming missiles come over the the horizon and give the defending vessel seconds to respond.
 

Gideon300

Well-known member
Mar 18, 2021
4,951
2,876
113
Does anyone want to go on record and state, the believe the earth flies at 67,000 mph, and spins 1,000 mph?!?!
Why is that so hard to accept? It is fact. The reason we don't fly off the surface of the earth is the same reason that you are not splattered all over the inside of an aircraft at 1,000 mph. You are moving at the same speed.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,783
13,414
113
Some common ball-Earth conundrums, and answers to them. To me, it's easy to see who is lying.

Why does the Earth seem motionless?
Flat Earther:
Because it is motionless.
Heliocentrist: It only seems motionless because it's spinning at a perfectly uniform speed with no acceleration or deceleration ever and the atmosphere is magically velcroed to it. Actually the Earth is spinning on it's axis at 1,000 mph, rotating around the Sun at 67,000 mph, which is orbiting the Milky Way at 500,000 mph and shooting through the known Universe at 67,000,000 mph. We don't feel even the slightest bit of this motion because all the centrifugal, gravitational, and inertial forces somehow perfectly cancel out.

Why do the Sun and Moon appear to be the same size?
Flat Earther:
Because they are the same size.
Heliocentrist: They only appear to be the same size because of an incredibly perfect parallax perspective from Earth. Actually the Sun is 1.392x10^6 km in diameter and 1.496x10^8 km from Earth. The Moon is 3,474 km in diameter and 384,403 km from the Earth. And these just happen to be the EXACT diameters and distances necessary for a viewer from Earth to falsely perceive them as being the same size.

Why do the Sun, Moon, and Stars all appear to revolve around a stationary Earth?
Flat Earther:
Because they do.
Heliocentrist: The Moon does revolve around the Earth, but the Earth actually revolves around the Sun, and all the stars only seem to revolve around the Earth because the Earth itself is spinning beneath your feet!

Why do we never see the rotation of the Moon?
Flat Earther:
Because it doesn't rotate.
Globalist: Both the Moon and the Earth are actually rotating but they are doing so in such a way that from our perspective it seems that neither are. The Earth is spinning East to West at 1,000 mph while orbiting the Sun at 67,000 mph. The Moon is spinning West to East at 10.3 mph while orbiting the Earth at 2,288 mph. These motions/speeds perfectly cancel out so that the Moon always only shows us one side.

Why do the stars appear to be fixed along a celestial hemisphere?
Flat Earther: Because they are.
Heliocentrist: The stars only appear to be fixed along a celestial hemisphere because they are so incredibly far away. Even after hundreds of millions of miles of our (supposed) orbit around the Sun, the stars appear in the exact same positions at the exact same meridian times because they are many "light-years" away. A light-year is approximately 6 TRILLION miles away and that is why they falsely seem fixed from our faulty perspective.
Once again you betray your profound ignorance of basic physics and geometry. Did you even graduate from high school?