Haha? What's so funny? The "good news" of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations and then shall the end come indeed. That still doesn't change what I explained to you in post #23.
I never said that was not good news.
Both Jesus and Paul preached the real gospel yet prior to the cross the full content of the gospel that Paul preached was still a
mystery.
Ephesians 3:1 - For this reason I, Paul, the prisoner of Christ Jesus for you Gentiles— 2 if indeed you have heard of the
dispensation of the grace of God which was given to me for you, 3 how that
by revelation He made known to me the mystery (as I have briefly written already, 4 by which, when you read, you may understand my knowledge in the
mystery of Christ), 5
which in other ages was not made known to the sons of men, as it has now been revealed by the Spirit to His holy apostles and prophets: 6
that the Gentiles should be fellow heirs, of the same body, and partakers of His promise in Christ through the gospel, 7 of which
I became a minister according to the gift of the grace of God given to me by the effective working of His power. 8 To me, who am less than the least of all the saints, this grace was given, that I should
preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ, 9 and to make all see what the
fellowship of the mystery is,
which from the beginning of the ages has been hidden in God who created all things through Jesus Christ.
Do you understand what a mystery is? Can you show me before the cross where the 12 disciples were preaching about the death, burial and resurrection of Christ and that the Gentiles should be fellow heirs, of the same body, and partakers of His promise in Christ through the gospel? I'll be waiting.
All of it is good news yet not everything was revealed all at once.
I never said that something was better than this. It's not about better or different gospels. It's about progressive revelation.
Yes, we read about the good news forth to sinners for salvation in His eternal kingdom in the four gospel accounts, but what about the rest? Should we just ignore Ephesians 3:1-9 and pretend that prior to the cross, the 12 disciples were preaching this mystery? Again, Peter had no clue that Jesus Christ would be crucified, buried and resurrected, yet he did believe that Jesus was the Messiah. This is obvious when, only moments later,
Peter rebukes Jesus Christ for saying he will be killed, and be raised again the third day" (Matthew 16:21). In verse 22,
"..Peter took him and began to rebuke him, saying, “Far be it from You, Lord; this shall not happen to You!”
After Jesus' crucifixion, instead of anxiously waiting his resurrection,
the apostles were still ignorant, disheartened at the death of their redeemer, and did not even at first believe the testimony of his resurrection. (Mark 16:14, Luke 24:19-24) It was not until
after his resurrection that Jesus appeared to the apostles and opened their understanding. (Luke 24:44-47)
Once again, it's not about multiple gospels, yet through
progressive revelation, there is a more distinctive element to the content of the gospel which Paul received from Christ and is called
"the mystery of the gospel." (see Ephesians 6:19 and compare with Colossians 1:26-27; 4:3) This new revelation is that the
Gentiles are fellow heirs and fellow members of the body, and fellow partakers of the promise. (Ephesians 3:6) Such equality, Jew and Gentile united together in one body was
previously unknown. The distinctive message of the church is that Jew and Gentile alike may believe the gospel and be united together into one body. (Ephesians 1:13; 1 Corinthians 12:13)
I'll be waiting for you to show me where
before the cross the 12 disciples preached about the death, burial and resurrection of Christ, along with this same
mystery that Paul preached in Ephesians 3:1-9.
Amen!
I never said there was a second gospel. I said through progressive revelation there is a more distinctive element to the content of the gospel which Paul received from Christ and is called
"the mystery of the gospel." (see Ephesians 6:19 and compare with Colossians 1:26-27; 4:3) This new revelation is that the
Gentiles are fellow heirs and fellow members of the body, and fellow partakers of the promise. (Ephesians 3:6) Such equality, Jew and Gentile united together in one body was
previously unknown.
I challenge you to show me
BEFORE THE CROSS where the 12 disciples preached about the death, burial and resurrection of Christ and also where the 12 disciples preached the further content of the mystery of the gospel, that the Gentiles should be fellow heirs, of the same body, and partakers of His promise in Christ through the gospel. What's heresy is a "different" gospel that promotes salvation by works. (Galatians 1:6-9) Do you even understand the purpose of Peter's vision in Acts 10:9-16?
It sounds to me like you don't understand what a mystery is or progressive revelation and you also lean towards salvation by works.
You seem determined to judge and condemn me and you don't seem to understand that I am NOT claiming there's a different gospel.