We see in china families are limited to how many children they can have.
Does it go deeper than this would like to know peoples thoughts on this.
Old information. China discovered that population restrictions are catastrophic. The population is aging. Young people can't afford to raise a family there now. Restrictions have been lifted. Russia and North Korea have no restrictions, but they have discovered the same thing. Japan has no formal policy but families are not having enough children to replace those who die. This is pretty much the story of the Western world as well. Australia has raised the age that people can access the old age pension. People are living much longer, are healthier in general and welfare is sending the country broke. Hence importing hundreds of thousands of people to a country that already has a chronic housing shortage.We see in china families are limited to how many children they can have.
Does it go deeper than this would like to know peoples thoughts on this.
You have it wrong. The elites need people. They need people to control, to earn money to buy things to make the elites rich. A robot is never going to buy anything. Factories may well churn out cheap products, but if there if there is no one to buy them, it is pointless.What do the following have in common?
Bill Gates
Eugenics
Abortion/ Infanticide
Vaccines
Pagans throwing virgins into volcanoes and ovens in the images of devil's
Atmospheric aerosolized sprays
Most hospices
World wars
Hundreds of harmful chemicals and heavy H20 added to municipal waters sourced from CCP wastes..
Communism
Veterans Hospitals
Yuval Noah Harari
Santa Claws Schwab
Daleks and made in the USA Killer Robots
EXTERMINATION
We see in china families are limited to how many children they can have.
Does it go deeper than this would like to know peoples thoughts on this.
Keep in mind what you are asking.Understood everything said so far,
My next thought would be, should there be any legitimate reason for population control.
You have it wrong. The elites need people. They need people to control, to earn money to buy things to make the elites rich. A robot is never going to buy anything. Factories may well churn out cheap products, but if there if there is no one to buy them, it is pointless.
It seems counter intuitive, but one of the reasons the Union won the Civil War is that it had a better economy. And part of the reason for that was the end of slavery. Workers were paid, which means taxes and a stronger economy. Slavery was in theory the cheapest labour, but slaves also contributed nothing to the economy but their labour. Slaves also cost money to feed and house, even if that was rudimentary.
I was wondering what a legitimate reason could be if population control was done in a way that didn't involve anything drastic was my first thought,Keep in mind what you are asking.
The establishment globalists, who are run by the principalities and powers, rephrase the languages to sanitize their agendas.
"Population control" means mass murder.
To restate your question after going through the goober translator, "Is there any legitimate reason that the powers should murder large populations?"
Chairman Mao gave plenty of reasons as he slaughtered according to CCP estimates 80-100+ million souls.
What do you think?
interestingly enough there has been on average 53 million deaths world wide each year through out the 2000s. I wonder why it's a regular number each yearInteresting facts
There were 67 million people who died in 2022. Combined with the fact that 134 million babies were born in 2022, the world population increased by 67 million people in 2022 (134 million births – 67 million deaths = 67 million more people; a net increase of 0.84%).
sorry I logged in with the wrong one, I did ask Robocop to close it 3 days agoYou are not supposed to have two active accounts going at the same time.
You should request of the mod to have Fundaamental deleted.
Which would kind of be shame, because then we could not
search your post history, being that you would be a guest.
maybe the mods haven't deleted it because they dont believe in pollution controlYou are not supposed to have two active accounts going at the same time.
You should request of the mod to have Fundaamental deleted.
Which would kind of be shame, because then we could not
search your post history, being that you would be a guest.
Thank you for raising this question.I was wondering what a legitimate reason could be if population control was done in a way that didn't involve anything drastic was my first thought,
I thought of maybe one like the lack of natural resources possible would be a valid reason for a none drastic population control,
But I thought if there was such a reason could it go much deeper in a drastic way
Have you asked him to?maybe the mods haven't deleted it because they dont believe inpollutionpopulation control![]()